Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Human rights/Archive 12

Archive 5 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12

GAR notice

Brown v. Board of Education has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 03:10, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:2020–2023 United States racial unrest#Requested move 3 January 2023

 

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:2020–2023 United States racial unrest#Requested move 3 January 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. echidnaLives - talk - edits 10:42, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Amhara genocide requested move

Talk:Amhara genocide#Requested move 13 January 2023 may be of interest to people on this WikiProject. Boud (talk) 10:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Discussion notice at WP:MINING

There is a discussion at WP:MINING that may interest members of this project. Larataguera (talk) 15:20, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Helms Amendment to the Foreign Assistance Act

  You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Helms Amendment to the Foreign Assistance Act. Wes sideman (talk) 13:45, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:42, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

FAR for William Wilberforce

User:Buidhe has nominated William Wilberforce for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Working. § Lingzhi (talk) 06:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Deletion Discussion.

A biography rated by this project is being considered for deletion. The article is Maryann Krieglstein. The deletion discussion is found here. Full discloser of my own COI: I am her son. Dkriegls (talk to me!) 00:40, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

"Sex-based rights" listed at Redirects for discussion

  The redirect Sex-based rights has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 8 § Sex-based rights until a consensus is reached. Mathglot (talk) 17:14, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

RFC at Talk:Boulton and Park#RFC: Limerick's appropriateness

There is a current RFC on a page that is a part of this Wikiproject. The RFC summary is as follows:

This article about two Victorian crossdressers currently ends with a limerick in which an animal being sodomized asks the perpetrator if he had mistaken the animal for the two article subjects. There are two questions for consideration: (1) Should this limerick end the article, as it currently does? and (2) Should the text of the limerick be included?

Any participation would be greatly appreciated. Thanks so much, --Jerome Frank Disciple 14:26, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Pushbacks in Greece#Requested move 5 July 2023

 

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Pushbacks in Greece#Requested move 5 July 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 18:53, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

 

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Allegations of genocide of Ukrainians in the Russian invasion of Ukraine/Archive 1#Requested move 4 August 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 08:50, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello Everyone/Proposed Edits

Hello everyone. My name is Goose0919 and I am a student at Rice University in the course Poverty Justice and Human Capabilities. I plan on revising and expanding on the current Wikipedia article Child marriage in the United States. I hope to expand and shed light onto this important topic. If you have any feedback or advice/tips please feel free to let me know!

Here is my sandbox with more information and resources. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Goose0919/Child_marriage_in_the_United_States

Goose0919 (talk) 04:25, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Goose0919

Adding a sentence

{{Please see Wikipedia:Teahouse#Adding_a_sentence_to_the_Rape_in_Islamic_law_article}} I was redirected to ask here from the Teahouse. To the, "Self defence" section of the Rape in Islamic law article, I want to add, "However, nowadays, a person who kills a rapist or potential rapist in self defence can be tried and convicted for murder.[1][2][3]" but will it pass muster? Can someone suggest some better text I can add to summarise those sources, so that they are acceptable?-

References

  1. ^ "An entire life sentenced to death". OHCHR. 10 October 2018. Retrieved 12 July 2023.
  2. ^ "Judged for more than her crime" (PDF). deathpenaltyworldwide.org. September 2018. Retrieved 28 December 2022.
  3. ^ "Indonesia protests at execution of maid in Saudi Arabia". BBC News. 15 April 2015. Retrieved 28 December 2022.

1Firang (talk) 05:35, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

This conversation is active at Rape in Islamic law. Anyone from this project who is interested can join the discussion there. Bluerasberry (talk) 15:06, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed edits to existing article

Hi everyone, I am a student at Rice University who is planning on editing the Homelessness in the United States by state article. For more information, you can see details about my plan on my user page and sandbox. I've added this article in the Human Rights WikiTopic as a mid importance article. Please let me know if anyone has any feedback.

Pouchwarm (talk) 03:46, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

I see your "outline of proposed changes" and have some feedback.
What you are doing, and what happens on Wikipedia, is a sort of "literature review". This means that you can report information that you find in reliable sources, and that you cannot report what you do not find in those sources.
Wikipedia has standards for WP:Reliable sources. Some of the sources you have listed in your draft bibliography do not meet that standard.
Instead of planning what information you will write, consider going to the library with no agenda and simply finding the best sources of information you can find on the topic. I suspect that you will not find reliable sources that match your expectations.
After finding the best sources you can possibly find, then read those sources and report in Wikipedia whatever they say. Plan your changes around whatever is in the sources, and especially if you see issues raised in multiple sources, even if it is not the information that you imagined before doing the research. Bluerasberry (talk) 15:23, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

In Need of Advice

Hi! I am a student who will be creating a new article covering "Human Trafficking in Houston". I hope to bring awareness/educational information and a municipal perspective to a global issue. Houston is a major spot for trafficking activity and I believe it is important to create a new entry covering the city's part in Human Trafficking. I am happy to hear any advice or feedback, so feel free to visit my user page. Ctrlxem (talk) 05:37, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

@Ctrlxem: Normally I would recommend against making such a specific article for a city, but I know something about this issue in Houston, this is a case where there are lots of sources.
You already checked out Human_trafficking_in_Texas#Houston and said on your talk page that you have more information to share than can fit in a subsection on the state article. That is a good reason to establish a new article if you have the sources, and I know you can get them.
Follow the general Wikipedia editing advice of starting in the library and finding the best sources before outlining your plan. Doing library research upfront before planning your article is a strategy that often works well. Bluerasberry (talk) 15:26, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your help!!! I will be continuing with my plan of creating the article (of course with your advice in mind). Once I have a draft of my article in my sandbox, would you mind checking it out?
Again, thank you for the response! Ctrlxem (talk) 14:43, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
@Ctrlxem: Yes ping me when you have something.
@Bluerasberry: I have made a brief summary about what content it will contain, so feel free to check my sandbox linked in my user page! I still am working on gathering citations and specifying the page numbers, and am aware that some links might be broken. Please let me know what you think, thanks!

Hi Everyone

Hello! I am a student at Rice University writing a new article titled "Human Trafficking of North Korean Women in China." I believe this issue is important in the human rights realm, so I have added the WikiProject to the parent article. (Evelyn4712 (talk) 04:12, 1 October 2023 (UTC))

Look to this sandbox for more information. The neighborhood really has a lot of history that should be included and displayed for the world to see. The article will be about Comuna 13 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alecprofit Alecprofit (talk) 03:16, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

@Evelyn4712: Do what you feel is best. Everyone has different results and ideas.
I will suggest that you consider instead developing either Human trafficking in North Korea or Human trafficking in China, which are already established with other context, have traffic, and have major gaps in their development. A likely route that readers would take to find "Human Trafficking of North Korean Women in China" is through one of those, so your proposed article would interconnect with those anyway.
Before you decide to establish that new article, make sure you have found good reasons to do so rather than just developing and updating what already exists. There are lots of good reasons to make the article you describe; drawbacks include that new articles take significantly more work and every intersection, intersectional articles, "only North Koreans", "being trafficked to only China", and "only women", get much less traffic than the broader concepts. Bluerasberry (talk) 15:17, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
@Bluerasberry: Thank you so much for your advice! I asked my professor about integrating my work into one of the existing articles like Human trafficking in North Korea or Human trafficking in China but she said she thought this information important enough to stand on its own. I will talk to her about your suggestions (as I do agree with them) and I will get back to you on what I end up doing! As for the article traffic, my professor has encouraged me to link my article to others and link other articles in mine, so I am not too worried about it. I also think awareness about this topic is slowly growing globally, so the attention my article gets should grow with it. Thanks again! (Evelyn4712 (talk) 18:24, 10 October 2023 (UTC))
@Evelyn4712: Yes, I agree that it is an important topic which can stand on its own. Good luck developing it and I will support you whatever you decide. If you want comment when you have something to share then ping me. Thanks. Bluerasberry (talk) 18:38, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
@Bluerasberry: I just updated my sandbox to offer a summary of my article! Let me know what you think. Thank you! (Evelyn4712 (talk) 03:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC))

Merging articles about Afro-pessimism

There are 2 articles related to Afro-pessimism right now:

Other philosophies and theories don't have parentheses with location that a theory may comment on and it doesn't make sense to include it in these in my understanding. Afro-pessimism speaks widely to conditions affecting Black people, and subsections of a merged article could describe different regional contexts and meanings of the term. We should not have 2 separate articles, a merge of these articles should be a priority with these pages. Thoughts from experts? Hexatekin (talk) 04:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Israeli permit regime in the West Bank

 

An editor has requested that Israeli permit regime in the West Bank be moved to another page, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. GnocchiFan (talk) 20:31, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Deportation of undocumented Afghans from Pakistan#Requested move 5 November 2023

 

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Deportation of undocumented Afghans from Pakistan#Requested move 5 November 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —Alalch E. 23:59, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Mass detentions in the 2023 Israel–Hamas war

There are pretty extraordinary developments underway right now pertaining to the Mass detentions in the 2023 Israel–Hamas war - flagging this here given the pertinence to this WikiProject. Iskandar323 (talk) 08:32, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Not My Life Featured article review

I have nominated Not My Life for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:41, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

FAC of Education

Hello, I wanted to let you know that I have nominated the article Education for featured article status. So far, there has not been much response from reviewers and I was wondering whether some of the editors here are inclined to review it. The nomination page can be found at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Education/archive1. If you have the time, I would appreciate your comments. For a short FAQ on the reviewing process, see Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2008-04-07/Dispatches. Phlsph7 (talk) 09:33, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Jamie Kalven FAC

I have nominated Jamie Kalven, an American journalist based in Chicago, for Featured Article status. Your feedback is welcome at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Jamie Kalven/archive1. Cheers! Edge3 (talk) 02:56, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

Hamdan v. Rumsfeld has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:55, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Bangladesh genocide has an RfC

 

Bangladesh genocide, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Malerisch (talk) 03:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

 

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Killing of Alon Shamriz, Yotam Haim, and Samer Talalka#Requested move 18 December 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. — mw (talk) (contribs) 20:49, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for McCarthyism

McCarthyism has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:06, 26 December 2023 (UTC)