||Not judging by article sources but what is available outside the article
||Based on what indicated in the draft article
||NPP - sources will only be included by interested editor to support the content claimed which would take years or no sources are added at all
NPP - reviewer can moved article to draft page under WP:NPPDRAFT if no source or only dependent/not relaible sources presented in the article
AfC - editor who input the info responsible to provide source - inline with WP:PROVEIT or WP:BURDEN verifiability guidelines
||user right min requirement -
||at least 90 days, and have made at least 500 not-deleted edits to mainspace.
no behavioral blocks or 3RR violations for a span of 6 months
experience with moving pages
|at least 90 days, and have made at least 500 not-deleted edits to mainspace.
requires experience with deletion
|both given by admin
1.accept upon credible claim of significance even without sources if sources could be found by reviewer - place the responsibility reviewers to look for sources on behalf of the creator
2.accept and tag NPOV
3.No communication or advise by reviewer
4.Only one reviewer but if found unsoundly accepted, other reviewer can unreview the page
5.Page would be indexed by after 3 months in NPP even the page has not been reviewed
6.Reviews do the tagging (unreferenced/stub/improve cat)
7.Review AfC approved article unless the AfC reviewer hold both AfC and NPP user rights
8.Design for autoconfirmed user. Any PAID editors' article need to move to "Draft" space (AfC review) irregardless how many edits or page created by the PAID editors in the past.
9. NPP discussion page - mostly among reviewers
|1.accepted if independent, reliable sources present in the article - place responsibility on creator to provide sources so they would comply to Wikipedia content policy
2.decline if NPOV (accordance with WP:Content policy)
3.Automated recline message and reveiwer's comment on draft page to creator on how to improve/what is need
4.Multiple reviewers could review a page if the page is previously decline
5.Could be G13 for stale drafts after 6 months or postponing G13
6.Reviewers do the tagging (cat, Wikiproject, article class assessment)
7.No need to review NPP page.
8.Design for new user who is not familiar with Wikipedia, but autoconfirmed editor would move drat to main at will where AfC review will be replaced by NPP review.
9. AfC help desk for creator seeking help