Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Coordinators/2017/2

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors‎ | Coordinators

Overview edit

The project coordinators are responsible for maintaining the procedural and administrative aspects of the project. They are the designated points of contact for procedural issues and are responsible for ensuring that the project as a whole is properly informed of them.

To provide some examples of coordinator duties: the coordinators manage the proposal and creation of new task forces; ensure that project announcement and task lists are kept up-to-date; initiate drafting of guidelines needed by the project; organize the category system; oversee the recruitment of new members, including the use of project notices and other advertising methods; create and maintain collaborative projects if any; maintain the project page and the various guidelines in it in a clean and easy-to-use state; wear the juice; monitor technical policies and ensure that project templates satisfy them; and assist in organizing and promoting any Backlog Elimination Drives.

They are also expected to generally assist project members with any questions or concerns.

The coordinator positions do not entail any executive power.

Positions edit

  • Lead Coordinator (one open position): will have overall responsibility for procedural and administrative matters within the project.
  • Coordinator (2–4 open positions): will assist the Lead Coordinator by focusing on specific areas within the project that require special attention. These areas will be selected based on need and interest among the coordinators.

Election process edit

  • The election process will run for two weeks from June 16, 00:01 UTC until June 30, 23:59 UTC.
  • Any member of the project may nominate themselves for either position by creating a new section under Nominations below and copying the sample form below. Nominees only interested in one position should indicate this when adding their names. Candidates need not make extensive statements if they do not wish to do so.
  • The elections will be conducted using simple approval voting. Any member of the project may support a nominee for either position. If the nominee is running for both positions and you wish to support them for only one, please make a note to that effect as part of your vote.
  • Both project members and interested outside parties are encouraged to ask questions of the nominees or to make general comments.

Incumbents edit

Name Position Standing for re-election?
Miniapolis (talk · contribs) Lead Coordinator Yes (as Coordinator)
Corinne (talk · contribs) Coordinator Yes
Jonesey95 (talk · contribs) Coordinator Yes (as Coordinator or Lead)
Tdslk (talk · contribs) Coordinator Yes

Sample nomination edit

Editor's Username edit

Example (talk · contribs) • Interested in Coordinator position only.

Brief statement here

Support edit

Comments and questions edit

Nominations edit

Voting is open.

Jonesey95 edit

Jonesey95 (talk · contribs)

I am willing to serve as Coordinator or Lead Coordinator again. I have served as Coordinator or Lead Coordinator since January 2014. I primarily focus on keeping the drives and blitzes running regularly, and on the periodic administrative tasks. I also try to ensure that questions are answered on our various talk pages. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:47, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support edit

  1. Thanks for returning as lead coordinator (and for throwing together the blitz :-)). Miniapolis 17:42, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Thanks for your willingness to serve again as lead coordinator.  – Corinne (talk) 20:17, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Thanks for all of the hard work you do! Tdslk (talk) 17:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. We wouldn't be here without you. Keira1996 22:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Much thanks for everything you do. – Reidgreg (talk) 12:46, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Thanks for your help and general watchfulness. Dhtwiki (talk) 16:42, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments and questions edit

Questions are welcome at any time during the nomination or voting period.

  1. What is your strategy to reduce the long-standing backlog and also to improve the effectiveness of copy editing? --Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:45, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The backlog at the end of May 2017 was lower than it has ever been, at 1,388 pages spread over 11 months, down from 2,022 pages spread over 18 months two years earlier. Given that over 300 new articles are tagged every month, that is a remarkable achievement. My strategy is to keep doing what we are doing; it is clearly working. If you have ideas about how to recruit and retain additional skilled copy editors – I think it is counter-productive to simply recruit more copy editors of low skill – I am all ears.
As for the effectiveness of copy-editing, I depend on editors to provide copy editing with competence, and when editors do not do so to the satisfaction of other editors, I expect those dissatisfied editors to bring it up with the copy editor or with the Guild. People have done so in the past, and we have worked through those situations effectively, I believe.
All of that said, I think we do should get newsletters out more often as a retention tool. I think that one of our coordinators had that as a personal goal for this term, but I do not remember the details. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:18, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tdslk edit

Tdslk (talk · contribs)

I am interested in serving as a Coordinator, a role I have held for the past year, mainly focusing on drives and blitzes.

Support edit

  1. Thanks for returning, and I look forward to working with you again. Miniapolis 17:43, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Thanks for your willingness to continue as a coordinator.  – Corinne (talk) 20:18, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Long standing member and coordinator, and I've actually been blindsided by their question answer. Wow. Keira1996 02:23, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Thanks; interesting to refocus as the backlog shrinks. – Reidgreg (talk) 12:46, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Thank you for returning. I've appreciated your use of the Thank function recently. Dhtwiki (talk) 16:42, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support. Thank you. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:01, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments and questions edit

  1. What is your strategy to reduce the long-standing backlog and also to improve the effectiveness of copy editing? --Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:46, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming you are referring to the backlog of articles tagged for copy editing, I actually have mixed feelings about it. On the one hand, I get inordinately excited to see down-pointing green arrows during each day of a drive. On the other hand, I know that should the backlog ever miraculously hit zero, that would not mean that Wikipedia is fully copy edited and we can all retire. As was pointed out elsewhere recently, there is a massive backlog of "cleanup" tags that overlap more than a bit with our mission, and then there are all of the articles that desperately need copy editing but haven't been tagged. I think ideally there would always be a moderate (say sub-500) number of tagged articles, and these would be whichever articles are most in need of our work out of the entire Wikipedia, which I guess ties in to your question of effectiveness. The more closely the list of tagged articles matches the true list of articles most in need of copy editing, the more efficient our work will be. Along those lines, I've done some amount of reaching out to editors who frequently tag pretty good articles, and also removing tags from, e.g., articles that are tagged for deletion or copyright issues, where our work might be wasted. I haven't done either of these in a systematic way, but I would be excited to discuss how to best do that with the Guild. Tdslk (talk) 23:09, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Miniapolis edit

Miniapolis (talk · contribs) • Interested in Coordinator position only.

Since wikiprojects can't run themselves, I'm willing to return as coordinator but am disappointed in the lack of interest on the part of several active copyeditors in helping with the GOCE's administrative side (although I'm grateful for the help with archiving completed requests). I'm glad that Tdslk is also returning, and Jonesey does a great job as lead coordinator even when they're not :-).

Support edit

  1. One of the best copy editors that I've ever come across. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:43, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Agreed.  – Corinne (talk) 20:20, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Thank you for stepping up again! Tdslk (talk) 17:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Agreed with the above. Helpful to newbies, great c/er and a good temperament to boot. Keira1996 22:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Thanks for all your help. – Reidgreg (talk) 12:46, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. You've shown considerable reasonableness and tact in dealing with some sticky issues. Thanks. Dhtwiki (talk) 16:42, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support. Of course. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:01, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments and questions edit

Keira1996 edit

Keira1996 (talk · contribs) • Interested in Coordinator position only.

I served as coordinator for the second half of 2015 (under the username KieranTribe, which has now been changed), though due to real life issues had to leave partway through. I'm happy to lend some assistance to the administrative side of the guild once again: especially fiddling with numbers, and maintaining the GOCE pages.

Support edit

  1. Welcome back, and thanks for your help! Miniapolis 17:45, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Welcome back! Thanks for running for coordinator!  – Corinne (talk) 20:22, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. I'm glad to see you back! Tdslk (talk) 17:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Thanks for coming back. – Reidgreg (talk) 12:46, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Thank you for returning. Dhtwiki (talk) 16:42, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support. Thank you for coming back. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:01, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments and questions edit

  1. What is your strategy to reduce the long-standing backlog and also to improve the effectiveness of copy editing? --Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:45, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I wholeheartedly believe that the current method of reducing the backlog is successful. Just look at the figures. Don't fix what's not broken, frankly. That said, the best way to increase the amount of articles that undergo a c/e is to recruit more new members. To do that, I have a few ideas that I may propose for discussion: changing of the newsletter to once monthly, for exposure, and placing for talk page notices. The second part of your question asks how I would improve the effectiveness of copy editing. I don't believe there is much room for improvement with our older members, but it needs to be easier for new members to get into copy editing. The question is, what issues are new copy editors facing? The main one, in my experience, is lack of understanding of Wikipedia format. Imagine trying to copy edit your first article through the source editor! Even the visual editor is still difficult to c/e successfully in, for a new member. I plan to create a basic guide for copy editing (akin to WP:C/E) through the visual editor, with a checklist of important things to look for in a c/e, and useful illustrations. I hope this would increase our newcomer retention and thus support reduction of our various backlogs. Keira1996 00:47, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Corinne edit

Corinne (talk · contribs) • Interested in Coordinator position.

It is my pleasure to nominate Corinne for re-election. Corinne's work on the Requests page has been diligent and consistent. We are lucky to have this conscientious editor. (This one-day-late nomination was approved by consensus of the current Coordinators.) – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:02, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support edit

  1. Thanks for returning, Corinne. Miniapolis 17:46, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Much needed --Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:43, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  3. You are always helpful! Tdslk (talk) 17:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  4. While I've had little interaction with Corinne personally, they've been a productive presence in the guild, and useful to have upon the coordinator team. Keira1996 22:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Thanks for coming back. – Reidgreg (talk) 12:46, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  6. You are a tremendous asset not just for GOCE operations, but for GOCE growth -- you were so level-headed in the exchanges we had (me being a brand new clueless editor) where many well known Wikipedians would have pulled rank and disregarded what I was saying. You didn't, you listened, and you helped. Then you went back to producing excellent copy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasphetamine (talk • contribs) 18:52, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Thank you for being willing to serve. Dhtwiki (talk) 16:42, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support as nominator. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:01, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments and questions edit

Current time is 02:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Coordinators/2017/2&oldid=788733667"