Wikipedia:Version 0.5 Set Nominations/Centuries

Centuries edit

Century articles tell what happened in a century, so people probably would want to read them. They are all lists. Eyu100 17:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems lopsided to have these and not earlier stuff. Maybe instead either milleniums or
Maurreen 16:04, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I like these, but can also see Maurreen's point. Could we have broader eras up to/including the 9th century, then every century after that? I think these century lists are pretty nice timelines. By all means add in the others too - aren't some of the Core topics along these lines? Walkerma 05:41, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am adding everything up to 100 BC and adding all the articles Maureen suggested. Eyu100 18:08, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If these have been added, why don't they appear at Wikipedia:Version 0.5? Maurreen 18:07, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that we should include all listed here. NCurse   work 15:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I support including all of these. They don't appear in V0.5 yet because "adding" referred to the above listing only, I presume they'll be added if the consensus supports that. Walkerma 15:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have tagged all the century articles. I'll finish adding the rest tomorrow. Walkerma 04:46, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]