Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Users for Deletion

Users for Explosion (UfX) is a place where Wikipedians decide what should be done with users which aren't covered by other specialized explosion discussion areas. Items sent here are usually discussed for one day; then they are either exploded by an system administrator, kept, trouted, dunked in a mop bucket, renamed, tagged as a sockpuppet of Oshwah, based on community consensus as evident from the discussion, consistent with policy, and with careful judgment of the rough consensus if required.

Purpose edit

Users for explosion may be used:

  • for problematic users;
  • for non-problematic users; or
  • for malfunctioning users.

Requests to unexplode users exploded after discussion here, and debate whether discussions here have been properly closed, both take place at Wikipedia:Explosion review, in accordance with Wikipedia's unexplosion policy. Due to technical limitations, namely medical science's inability to resurrect the dead, users which have gained consensus for unexplosion are added to a list, pending unexplosion at a time when resurrection is technically feasible.

Before nominating a user for explosion edit

Before nominating a user for explosion, please consider these alternatives:

Active discussions edit

2024 edit

ARandomPage edit

ARandomPage (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – (View UfD)​

Delete. Page has been inactive for a year. This is obviously because they've been planning to delete Wikipedia's Main Page. We must stop Page before they delete our Main Page! ARandomPage, the named space (talk • contribs) 13:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete and replace with 🗿 (April Fools!). —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 00:00, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Epicgenius edit

User:Epicgenius (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Epicgenius is an amazing editor with many edits. In particular, his contributions to New York City-related articles are tremendously invaluable. However, he persistently refuses to run for adminship, and as such, is starting to constitute a NETNEGATIVE for Wikipedia. As such, I propose that he be deleted. He may be undeleted in order to participate in his RFA. [April Fools!] —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 00:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

delete. also support indeffing Mr. Genius as WP:NOTHERE... this has gone on too long ... sawyer * he/they * talk 00:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Give him a moyai statue – Epicgenius (talk) 02:13, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:U5. Who writes their user page in third person besides self-promoters? LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 02:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete – Almost looks like a NOTWEBHOST violation but not blatantly so not a candidate for U5. However, I didn't expect for the subject to be an admin sice he's a perfect young man that brought GAs and FAs. However, let's indef him until he explicitly says to run for adminship.[April Fools!] Toadette (April Fools Day!) 05:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep because nobody else voted keep, and how could we possibly delete an epic genius
『π』BalaM314〘talk〙 15:13, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I mean c'mon, even I'm an admin now - sort of - so there is no excuse! 57.140.16.57 (talk) 16:35, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rename the user to Moyai on Train Wheels and make him wear a spiderman suit and climb the Reichstag Empire State Building!!!! ~Δ (delta • t • c) 17:38, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


Recent discussions edit

2023 edit

ARandomPage edit

ARandomPage (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – (View UfD)​

Delete. User is partially responsible (it's a weird story) for deleting the Main Page of Uncyclopedia. We should take preventative measures to prevent them from deleting Wikipedia's Main Page as well. ARandomPage, the named space (talk • contribs) 03:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the boy who stuffed beans in his nose 💜  melecie  talk - 09:22, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as accomplice. Don't worry, I'll be more active, I promise! JJPMaster 13:25, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome Aasim edit

Awesome Aasim (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – (View UfD)​

I am legally prohibited from disclosing why I'm doing this, but this editor also made a page called "Pro player de fifa" on Uncyclopedia that got deleted like two years ago, so that's my new reason. JJPMaster 00:25, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Redacted) per nom and (Redacted) 💜  melecie  talk - 09:20, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AmandaNP edit

AmandaNP (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – (View UfD)​

Delete. At 22:38 on March 31, user was heard to say that things were "too damn quiet" in wiki-land, thereby precipitating what will probably become an entire day of shenanigans. Someone with so many hats and years of experience should know better than to have created April 1. DMacks (talk) 04:25, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to AmandaP 💜  melecie  talk - 06:35, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Most mathematicians and computer scientists believe that P ≠ NP though. JJPMaster 16:26, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Can Amanda even be verified in polynomial time?? DMacks (talk) 18:21, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to ANI for an excessive over-trouting. -- Amanda (she/her) 13:49, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jimbo Wales edit

Jimbo Wales (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – (View UfD)​

Explode. per exploding whales Opal|zukor(discuss) 06:35, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Biodegrade per biodegradation.  – CityUrbanism 🗩 🖉 08:24, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Wales, Redirect to Whale, cue Duck Test by seeing what they sound like, then explode. That'd be an exploding wailing whale named Wales at Wales. 💜  melecie  talk - 14:34, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Whale Jimbo Wales:

 


Smash!

You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.

Mori Calliope fan talk 17:25, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Melecie edit

Melecie (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – (View UfD)​

User fails the Pokémon test, being the Japanese name of a clearly non-notable Pokémon. 💜  melecie  talk - 09:13, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PrincessPandaWiki edit

PrincessPandaWiki (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – (View UfD)​

Per WP:MONARCH, I am merely a descendent of a monarch who does not quality for notability.[April Fools!] ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 15:12, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Xingqiu Viator edit

Xingqiu Viator (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – (View UfD)​

Xingqiu is best at using Hydro to his advantage to protect his teammates. Therefore, I think by nominating Xingqiu for deletion he would be able to protect himself with his Hydro swords. Let's try. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 15:23, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2022 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was a whale of a UfD. (non-admin closure) MainPeanut (talk) 00:34, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jimbo Wales edit

Jimbo Wales (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – (View UfD)​

It's unoriginal and stupid, but someone had to. MainPeanut (talk) 13:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Leatherbear edit

Leatherbear (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – (View UfD)​

User claims to be based in a nonexistent city, so very likely this user doesn't actually exist. B2TF (talk) 06:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. By this logic, we might as well delete anyone based in Ohio as well. –ToxiBoi! (public) 17:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2021 edit

Panini! edit

Panini! (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – (View UfD)​

Practices canibalism. (Proof) --Diriector_Doc├─────┤TalkContribs 17:26, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • At first I thought you caught me eating my friend, but it was just coincidence. Phew! Panini📚 17:29, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cyberpower678 edit

Cyberpower678 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – (View UfD)​

No such user [April Fools!] Hhkohh (talk) 15:58, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TenPoundHammer edit

TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – (View UfD)​

I took the bait. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 12:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Cleary has not heard of the Streisand effect. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 12:55, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Example edit

Example (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – (View UfD)​

Clearly useless user without any edits. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 07:01, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete - page even says that it's not a real user!!! 141.92.129.41 (talk) 09:11, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strongest Possible Neutral - I have no opinion. 2A03:F80:32:194:71:227:81:1 (talk) 16:02, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: get that... th-th-thing... away from me! just... burn it to the s-s-s-stake, AAARGH! —beetricks ~ 💬 · ✉️ 21:08, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Number 57 edit

Number 57 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – (View UfD)​

Obvious vandalism and no real edits throughout his years of slaving away to the wikipedia gods. ~ Idan (username is Zvikorn) (talk) 08:25, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sentence to death because 57 ate nine. Panini📚 10:41, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the reasoning is simple here. 5+7=12. Twelve has 6 letters. 6+6+6=666. 666 is the devil. Therefore, this user is the devil and we must delete it. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 13:35, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I don't like maths. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 13:36, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nerd 85.153.236.206 (talk) 14:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

127.0.0.1 edit

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – (View UfD)​

Obvious sock of whoever is reading this. Yes, you. As they are not allowed to be blocked via policy, they must be deleted. HotdogPi 11:38, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Delete - Finally, a way to delete my account! ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 11:47, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Mind blown. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 13:35, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jimbo Wales edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the UfD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was overthrow. JJPMaster 19:55, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jimbo Wales (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – (View UfD)​

Delete this user, as they are a vandal and a real idiot. ChekhovsGunman (talk) 12:40, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Zvikorn edit

Zvikorn (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – (View UfD)​

He is impersonating Example! REDMAN 2019 (talk) 13:41, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ohmygosh he must be destroyed. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 14:16, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There are three impostors. O.N.R was the first one and Zvikorn is definitely the other one as shown above. And you look pretty sus trying to defend him... REDMAN 2019 (talk) 14:26, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong, there are two impostors. O.N.R. was ejected and it showed One impostor remaining. It’s also pretty sus for you to switch between indent styles, which is illegal per MOS:INDENTMIX. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 14:29, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Then doesn't that confirm Zvikorn's guilt? REDMAN 2019 (talk) 14:40, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@REDMAN 2019: You should at least wiki link this to Wikipedia:Users for Deletion. Idan (username is Zvikorn) (talk) 15:27, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Have done so. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 15:28, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

JJPMaster edit

JJPMaster (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – (View UfD)

Self-nom; prefers Wikipedia:Editor for deletion. JJPMaster 16:01, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See also edit

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Users_for_Deletion&oldid=1216689980"