Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/London Anti-Street Harassment Campaign. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Chevymontecarlo 08:32, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/London Anti-Street Harassment Campaign. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Chevymontecarlo 18:52, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation edit

 

London Anti-Street Harassment campaign, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

  • The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
  • Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
  • If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Chevymontecarlo 19:14, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

August 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Cranford, London has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Triona (talk) 13:53, 6 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

August 2011 edit

 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cognizant Technology Solutions, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

August 2012 edit

  Hello, I'm Basement12. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to 2022 Winter Olympics, because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Basement12 (T.C) 20:51, 13 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2012 edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Chris Kane (footballer) , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:37, 6 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

October 2012 edit

  Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Costa Coffee, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:09, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

December 2012 edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pistachio, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 15:41, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Drighlington. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. PamD 18:03, 8 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Connor Wickham . It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Materialscientist (talk) 09:11, 11 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

February 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Avoided. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Medikonduru, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Avoided (talk) 11:26, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Medikonduru with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Avoided (talk) 11:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Justin Lee Collins. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 13:41, 15 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 13:41, 15 February 2013 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello, 141.92.129.41, and welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for registering an account.
I hope you like the place and decide to stay.


    Introduction

 5   The five pillars of Wikipedia
    How to edit a page
    Help
    Tips

    How to write a great article
    Manual of Style
    Be Bold
    Assume Good faith
    Get adopted

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or get instant online help at IRC.
You can also place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will come shortly to answer your questions.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:55, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia! Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hurlford did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:55, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

April 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Excirial. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Law Courts, Brisbane that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:00, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm ChrisHodgesUK. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Peter Lawwell, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ChrisHodgesUK (talk) 09:59, 18 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, I'm Kubigula. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Olivadi, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Kubigula (talk) 15:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

May 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Fluffernutter. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Bradley Stoke, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:36, 23 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Tentinator. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Howard Brown (Halifax Bank) because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  Tentinator  10:55, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2013 edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Alfonso Ribeiro ‎ , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:01, 5 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Peaches Geldof, you may be blocked from editing. Gilliam (talk) 11:39, 5 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is your last warning. The next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Bigotry, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 13:18, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Acroterion (talk) 18:38, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. BadSynergy (talk) 20:14, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Graham Dodds concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Graham Dodds, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:34, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

September 2013 edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Krzysztof Kozik. Thank you. George8211 conversations / new message 18:55, 29 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2013 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ghazal. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Ezaid Fabber (talk) 22:09, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to University of Wolverhampton may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * [[Terence Beckett]] (former director-general, [[Confederation of British Industry|CBI]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:55, 15 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

December 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Norman Blackwell, Baron Blackwell, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk 16:21, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

January 2014 edit

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Nigersaurus ‎ , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:21, 18 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:34, 19 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Balornock. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Velella  Velella Talk   10:34, 19 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

February 2014 edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Dougweller (talk) 13:33, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sangama, Srirangapatna may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{[[Category:Rivers of Karnataka]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:39, 21 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Vin09. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of mandals and villages in Guntur district, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 10:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Palak (disambiguation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *[[Palak, Iran], places in Iran

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:54, 7 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Amortias. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Amortias (T)(C) 20:39, 11 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Dougweller (talk) 13:44, 12 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Dirkbb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to John Veale have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dirkbb (talk) 16:17, 22 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Tony Adams. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 14:01, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Joe McNerney. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Luk talk 12:32, 29 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

January 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Gilliam. An edit that you recently made to Jonathan (name) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! – Gilliam (talk) 11:00, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
  To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Doug Weller talk 11:24, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply