Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 September 28

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< September 27
September 29 >

September 28 edit

Template:Conferences edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, this article creation template was used once by the author on their sandbox. The template isn't about conferences in general, but is focused on one topic – Future Directions Forum – that Wikipedia doesn't have an article on. —⁠andrybak (talk) 23:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for your concern on our template. This template was supported by a Rapid Grant from the Wikimedia Foundation. I am currently reaching out to other people who worked on the grant to provide more context for why this template is important. I apologize also for reaching out so late! Magnolia321 (talk) Magnolia321 (talk) 23:14, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Pharmacokinetic metrics edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 October 7. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:25, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:RM-IFL edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:29, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very old (2005) IP talk page template used on just one page. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment is the information still accurate? Because WHOIS says it is a Microsoft Datacenter, and not whatever this was in 2005. -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 10:37, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Areaprogress edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:45, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Two uses, neither of which are producing meaningful progress bars. Remove entirely and delete. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:40, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: clear consensus for deletion, but unclear consensus as to what should happen with the transclusions. WikiCleanerMan and SWinxy: you both !voted to subst per nom, but nom recommended removal instead of substitution. Would you please clarify your respective !votes?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlastertalk 18:50, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comennt Didn't see that it wasn't a subst nomination. It should be removed from current usages and deleted per the nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Closeme edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:29, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links. We have Wikipedia:Closure requests for the apparent use of this template. Some version of this template could notify or categorize a page, which might be useful, but this is not it. The creation of such a template could be proposed at the talk page for closure requests. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: Ironically, I was about to use this template but couldn't remember the discussion. Anyways, I've seen this template substed before. This template is for listings at RfCr. Concur it needs a massive revamp though. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE 19:41, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There's no point in a fancy template for this. Pure text or {{initiated}} suffices. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:16, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 10:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Still unused and undocumented (no apparent substitions either, if my regex is working). Without some sort of tracking code, it is difficult to see how this template would be useful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:16, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I had thought about using this as a lightweight middle ground between a "someone should close this" comment and a whole trek to WP:CR, but didn't use it at the discussion I was in because I figured it would be pointy to use a known no-transclusion template while it was at TfD. I agree that this template runs contra the majority ethos of the site, where we make detailed todo list reports and keep track of everything. Folly Mox (talk) 03:27, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Chess champions 8 edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant to {{8TeamBracket-2Elim}}. – Pbrks (t • c) 03:32, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Check category edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:33, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No significant uses, presumably redundant to other templates like {{recategorize}}. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dangerverse edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 October 7. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_September_28&oldid=1179257601"