Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 July 31

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< July 30
August 1 >

July 31 edit

Template:Synonym, Authority, Year edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:47, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Intended use appears to be redundant to Template:Taxon list and related templates. Only one transclusion, on List of sharks, which could be substituted. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 22:13, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Attached KML/A Line (Blue) (Los Angeles Metro) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:52, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as the one used is Template:Attached KML/A Line (Los Angeles Metro). Gonnym (talk) 18:04, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Supra footnote edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to userspace, with no prejudice against moving back to the Template space if/when it is ready for use. Primefac (talk) 09:27, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Appears to be an abandoned experiment from March 2023. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:54, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • No, just a project to overhaul the Bluebook citation templates, which I set aside while thinking about a last-mile implementation question (unrelated to this template) and haven't looped back to. I'll get back to this soon. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 07:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Keep: Tamzin[cetacean needed] As long as it's someones on going project/work. We must allow it. --BeLucky (talk) 07:42, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Userify if Tamzin wants to continue work on it at their own pace. Gonnym (talk) 05:34, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 17:57, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Volleyball at the 2015 Pan American Games templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

following the convention for Olympic and Paralympic roster templates, these have been merged with the parent competition article and other transcluding articles have been updated to use WP:LST, so they are now all unused. Frietjes (talk) 14:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2015 Pan American Games volleyball team roster templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

following the convention for Olympic and Paralympic roster templates, these have been merged with the parent roster articles and other transcluding articles have been updated to use WP:LST, so they are now all unused. Frietjes (talk) 14:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nationality edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:08, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This... sidebar?... mistakenly got transcluded when someone mistyped {{{nationality}}}, but it is now unused and probably exists elsewhere as a proper sidebar and/or table (or inside an existing infobox). I guess my point is that it's a nice enough table but clearly not what folks are looking for. Primefac (talk) 12:53, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ghost Trick edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:11, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

With Sissel and Missile both having been merged into the character list, which I agree with due to their lack of reception regardless of how much I personally like the characters, there are too few pages to justify having a navbox for Ghost Trick - there is only one game, a character list and the game's author (and Ace Attorney for some reason, despite the series being unrelated). ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:43, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: I agree. Not enough articles to justify its existence, and every page it links to is included multiple times in the Ghost Trick article itself. Including Ace Attorney. — hoopder® 23:13, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Hoopder's comment. (I'm sure that Ace Attorney is there because Shu Takumi, who had multiple major roles in the development of Ghost Trick created the AA series, but the GT->ST->AA connection is already a whole sentence in the lead, so the template's unneeded.)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1993 Canadian federal election edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:12, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seems this was finished seeing as the creator's edit history shows edits for the 2019 election. Gonnym (talk) 07:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Peruvian political crisis short edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 09:31, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary sidebar created by a sockpuppet. There is already a navbox for this which has the same amount of links and we don't need more for the same subject. This is overkill. The navbox does need to be cleaned up as it is too large. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:07, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment: @WikiCleanerMan: It appears that the user was trying to mimic the Crisis in Venezuela sidebar and navbox? Despite some cleanup issues, the Peru and Venezuela templates don't seem too dissimilar. WMrapids (talk) 03:41, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WMrapids, sure, but let's not leave a sock creation hanging around. And all these links can easily go on the navbox. There is no need for a sidebar like this. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:34, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Despite some clean up and being from a sock, this is similar to existing sidebars and can be helpful for navigating the topic without having readers go to the bottom of the page.--WMrapids (talk) 16:17, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I also opt for keeping this since easy access to the general political crisis in Peru is sought and needed, especially by non-Peruvians and/or non-Latin-Americans. Also it is not so much of an identical repetition of the bottom links, and has better and easier visability and accessibility which must be appreciated for the above-mentioned users.Katafore (talk) 21:31, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 21:17, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, the navbox provides better navigation without taking up room that could be used by other right-floating content (like images and infoboxes). Frietjes (talk) 19:58, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (I will not see your reply if you don't mention me) 02:29, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: Seems to provide useful information and it's more quickly accessible than the bottom box. — Red XIV (talk) 07:38, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Logie Award for Most Outstanding Drama Series on Australian Television edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Logie Award for Most Outstanding Drama Series. Primefac (talk) 09:33, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Logie Award for Most Outstanding Drama Series on Australian Television with Template:Logie Award for Most Outstanding Drama Series.
As these are duplicate navbox templates which were mistakenly created for same award; the older navbox template should be merged into the newer template. Happily888 (talk) 01:36, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The one with "on Australian Television" in the title. This navbox features every winner since 1991. Whereas the same list from 1991 to 2016 is on the Logie Award for Most Outstanding Drama Series which has a more up-to-date list until 2019. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:10, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    The "on Australian Television" one should be history merged into the other navbox first, as it has had significant edit history and was created significantly earlier. Happily888 (talk) 06:28, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Either way, not opposed to it. It can go ahead this way as well. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:30, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_July_31&oldid=1169313710"