Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 March 3

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< March 2 March 4 >

March 3 edit

Template:Toyopet timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:16, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused timeline. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:54, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. We have very little content on this Toyota variant. Nigej (talk) 06:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hlist-reset edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:29, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused after removal from a handful of templates today (Template:Governors of California and Template:Governors of Zambales) where it clearly didn't work as advertised. At a higher level, few/no people are going to go around setting attributes on explicit HTML either. Regardless, if this is necessary, it should have a TemplateStyles version rather than an inline style version. Izno (talk) 01:17, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Eastern Intercollegiate Conference men's basketball team seasons edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:16, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This navbox is for a conference that existed for only eight seasons in the 1930s, and all of these schools are more well known for their participation in other conferences. The article at Eastern Intercollegiate Conference covers the topic well, and the target articles within this navbox do not highlight the EIC years in any special way. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:57, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IndyGo Purple Line edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:17, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This unsourced route diagram is for a bus rapid transit line that does not yet exist and has no article. See IndyGo (where the Red Line is mentioned, but not the Purple Line) and Category:Bus rapid transit in Indiana. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete As noted we don't have any con9tent at the moment. Also I'm very doubtful that we need route-maps for buses. Nigej (talk) 06:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Merge being discussed edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:12, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete This recent template duplicates the function of a much more capable existing template, {{Mergenote}}, which if set as {{Mergenote|wp=y}} is used for the purpose that this template is supposed to be used for. This template can only handle two pages and cannot specify discussion locations, while {{mergenote}} can handle many more merge candidates, and specify discussion locations. (After substitution and deletion, redirect to {{mergenote}} as a useful descriptive name for the older template) -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 02:28, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Party shading/Anti-Masonic/Hold edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:16, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused United States political party shading templates. Gonnym (talk) 05:49, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:R from upcoming event edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:06, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused redirect template that uses a deleted category. Gonnym (talk) 05:53, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WelshBiographyOnline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Dictionary of Welsh Biography. ✗plicit 12:16, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused external link template. Gonnym (talk) 06:09, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Use of https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:LinkSearch shows there is ample scope for it to be applied. Charles Matthews (talk) 06:20, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't link to what you meant to. But more importantly, 12 years is a long time for a template to be unused. Gonnym (talk) 06:40, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Be that as it may. Use of the pattern http://yba.llgc.org.uk/ in the tool, and a bit of research, is illuminating. It seems that Wiki Medic 2.5, in 2019, and in article space, probably converted http://yba.llgc.org.uk/en/ URLs into biography.wales URLs, avoiding a redirection. http://yba.llgc.org.uk/cy/ URLs still exist in article space. Those presumably should be changed, to the English-language versions. The importance of templating these references includes being able to change the formatter URL in one place. I have no idea whether the original template was ever used. Redirect seems appropriate. Charles Matthews (talk) 06:49, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Xlate-fr-en edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:06, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused translation template. Gonnym (talk) 06:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Year nav range edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:07, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused year box. Template:Year nav is the one used. Gonnym (talk) 06:12, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Unused and doesn't serve a very clear purpose. Nigej (talk) 06:49, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wiki Loves Pride template edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:07, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused but also unnecessary to mark a template as created during an event. Gonnym (talk) 06:22, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Star Trek regulars edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template and unnecessary notification. This is not a template disambiguation situation. Gonnym (talk) 06:29, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Positionskarte ISO 3166-2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map template. Gonnym (talk) 06:39, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Month year events in countryname category header edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and uncompleted template (see Template:Month year events in countryname category header/outer core). Move to creator's sandbox if they want it, otherwise delete. Gonnym (talk) 06:44, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Religion edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:17, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

'Single use meta-template'; all it's doing is slowing down processing when the template using it could trivially be using {{sidebar}} directly. Izno (talk) 07:31, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Australian Collaboration Notice edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:05, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive collaboration since 2012. Remove usages and delete. Gonnym (talk) 09:55, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused S-line MVV templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:06, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded. Nigej (talk) 11:16, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It would seem that @Mackensen has orphaned the MVV family. If these are not needed anymore, then delete all. Gonnym (talk) 13:49, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, delete all. These were for bus lines in the Munich area; their deprecation was discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains#Succession templates for bus lines. No replacement. Mackensen (talk) 13:53, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment These templates were deleted 6+ hours ago but this discussion is still open. Liz Read! Talk! 07:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:WikiProject Geographical coordinates/dim: edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Coord-doc-dim. Izno (talk) 18:57, 10 March 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Propose merging Wikipedia:WikiProject Geographical coordinates/dim: with Template:Coord-doc-dim.
This template is practically orphaned and abandoned, it seems to me appropriate to merge or delete it. Moreover it is in the namespace template, so it can also be used by ns0; it makes sense to use it only in the guidelines. The merge would take place between two different namespaces (Wikipedia: and Template:). I couldn't figure out how to correctly link the following template in the request, therefore I list it manually: here corrected -- ZandDev (msg) 13:47, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused S-line MVG templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:07, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused S-line MVG templates for bus lines in the Munich area. Nigej (talk) 14:40, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Local Government act 2013 amendment 2019 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:54, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not the sort of thing that should be a template; this is transcluded in one place and should be substituted there and deleted (and honestly should be put in a better reference format than a bare URL). Elli (talk | contribs) 17:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AMD Radeon 600 mobile edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:54, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An unused duplicate of {{AMD Radeon RX 600}}. Nigej (talk) 17:58, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Algeria opentask/Count edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:55, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relates to an inactive WikiProject. Unused and the number seem quite meaningless. Nigej (talk) 18:08, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ancestors of Elizabeth II edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:55, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused genealogy of the queen covered at Elizabeth II#Ancestry. Nigej (talk) 18:11, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_March_3&oldid=1076414936"