Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 8

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< February 7 February 9 >

February 8 edit

Template:Democratic Floor Leaders edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. {{U.S. State Senate floor leaders}} and {{U.S. State House floor leaders}}, each of which have between 100 and 200 transclusions, appear to be preferred. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Surplus to the two noted. Nigej (talk) 09:21, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Elvis Presley tracks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. A better version of this article content exists at the article, Elvis Presley (album). – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Adds nothing useful. Nigej (talk) 07:30, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pennsylvania State Athletic Conference football venue navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:32, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. The more comprehensive {{Pennsylvania college football venues}} appears to be preferred. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:10, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The PSAC has 17 teams in Pennsylvania and 1 in West Virginia, so the template noted seems best. Don't think we need both. Nigej (talk) 07:14, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Polling table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:32, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation. This set of templates appears to be an abandoned experiment from mid-2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RTA acc big edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:33, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links, documentation, or categories. It is possible that this template could be useful, but it is three years old and unmodified since its creation. It is likely that the need for this pretty simple image call is being met in other ways. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:23, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2022 Commonwealth Games cricket convenience templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per the style used at eg Ice hockey at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Men's team rosters#Canada/Canada at the 2022 Winter Olympics#Ice hockey and noted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 7#2006 Commonwealth Games netball convenience templates. I have converted the articles for the upcoming Cricket at the 2022 Commonwealth Games (and Australia at the 2022 Commonwealth Games etc) to use this "section" style and the listed templates are no longer required. Nigej (talk) 07:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2022 Commonwealth Games netball convenience templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per the style used at eg Ice hockey at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Men's team rosters#Canada/Canada at the 2022 Winter Olympics#Ice hockey and noted above. I have converted the articles for the upcoming Netball at the 2022 Commonwealth Games (and Australia at the 2022 Commonwealth Games etc) to use this style and the listed templates are no longer required. Nigej (talk) 09:15, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Same reasons as those given in the 2006 netball convenience template discussion. Edvid (talk) 15:22, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete same reason as for the cricket ones above, and all the other ones discussed previously. 10:14, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Module map Arica-Parinacota edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:39, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map. Maps are now created in the module space. See Module:Location map. Gonnym (talk) 09:22, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Israeli Basketball National League Cup edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no main article. I have added the one unique link in this navbox to {{Israeli Basketball National League}}, which has plenty of room to accommodate an extra row for this tournament if it becomes a regular occurrence. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Unnecessary when there's a perfectly good template already. Nigej (talk) 17:46, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canada COTW edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Templates relating to the current Canadian collaboration of the week, the last one being in 2006. No prospect of reuse.Nigej (talk) 19:08, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. There haven't been used for years and won't come back. Gonnym (talk) 21:26, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Latest stable software release/GNU Screen edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. The relevant article has been modified to use Wikidata, as is the trend with these software release templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:09, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Latest stable software release/Quod Libet (software) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. The relevant article has been modified to use Wikidata, as is the trend with these software release templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:10, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Catholic religious institutes sidebar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar surplus to the well used {{Catholic religious institutes}} navbox. Nigej (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cryptid simians edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. {{Cryptozoology}} covers the area. Nigej (talk) 19:36, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Current Japanese Minor Go title holders edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. Supposedly current but not been updated for over 5 years. Nigej (talk) 19:41, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Oceania culture templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete all but Samoa and Tokelau. There is concern about these two templates, so I will relist those two for further discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:41, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Part of set of these sidebars, these 10 being unused. There are no transclusions and the only links are from the other sidebars. Really no point in creating these since there isn't enough content to talk about a "series" of articles. {{Culture of Oceania}} covers the area. Nigej (talk) 20:22, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete all Except Samoa and Tokelau. These two have enough articles for sidebars and are not majority redirects to the main article sections. Six articles in the Tokelau and eight articles in the Samoa sidebars. Nigej, thoughts? Unless these two fall under the rest and maybe the topic navbox is enough in terms of navigating to these articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Maybe you're right. There's actually quite a lot articles at Category:Tokelauan culture, it's just that the creator didn't add them to the sidebar and didn't add the sidebar to any articles. Nigej (talk) 14:34, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The same is true in terms of articles for the respective Oceania countries and territories categories under the Culture category. Perhaps these need to include those articles instead of outright deletion. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Campaignbox Peasants' War (1798) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and the only link is to the parent article. Nigej (talk) 20:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Campaignbox Last war of the Roman Republic edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and just two links. Nigej (talk) 20:57, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Boeing 7x7 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused later version of {{Boeing 7x7 timeline}}. No idea why someone would create this. Nigej (talk) 22:04, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu elections edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks OK but actually just links to different sections of the same article: Dadra and Nagar Haveli (Lok Sabha constituency). Nigej (talk) 22:20, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_February_8&oldid=1072386763"