Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 December 19

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< December 18 December 20 >

December 19 edit

Template:Single cat backlog inner edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 December 27. ✗plicit 11:17, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bcdb edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:BCDB title. Izno (talk) 05:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Bcdb with Template:BCDB title.
Template:Bcdb appears to be a less advanced version of Template:BCDB title. Serving the same purpose, both templates are presently in use. Propose Bcdb be absorbed into BCDB title. — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 20:13, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • merge: this will result in more uniform article sources. ---- Mirokado (talk) 23:14, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge. Clearly these are duplicate templates.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  07:24, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:13, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2018 Commonwealth Games badminton templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:07, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

all merged into Template:2018 Commonwealth Games badminton Frietjes (talk) 16:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2014 Commonwealth Games men's field hockey templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:08, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

all merged into Template:2014 Commonwealth Games men's field hockey Frietjes (talk) 16:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2014 Commonwealth Games women's field hockey templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:08, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

all merged into Template:2014 Commonwealth Games women's field hockey Frietjes (talk) 16:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2014 Commonwealth Games netball templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:08, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

all merged into Template:2014 Commonwealth Games netball Frietjes (talk) 16:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2014 Commonwealth Games badminton templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:07, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

all merged into Template:2014 Commonwealth Games badminton Frietjes (talk) 16:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2018 Commonwealth Games netball templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:08, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

all merged into Template:2018 Commonwealth Games netball Frietjes (talk) 16:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Jewish leader edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:57, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox Jewish leader with Template:Infobox religious biography.
there is no advantage to using "infobox Jewish leader" and is used for the same purpose as Infobox religious biography. איתן קרסנטי (talk) 14:14, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • comment: I see this is a wrapper with about 15 additional parameters. I am not sure if any of these map onto any existing paramter in {{Infobox religious biography}}. a sandbox demo of a merged template would be instructive. Frietjes (talk) 16:16, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:12, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. If there are fifteen additional parameters, a merger sounds technically problematic. The template already has about 70 parameters, and adding 15 more will make it harder to use. 123.51.107.94 (talk) 04:32, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep pending demonstration of how this merge would work. The nominated template is transcluded in about 900 articles, so it is clearly useful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:23, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sweden squad 1981 Bandy World Championship edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed, as all the players' links are redlinks. Not enough blue links to justify a template. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:10, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FoP-US edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:05, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No need for this template. Template:FoP-USonly has now its own content that is more aligned to its purpose – for photos of buildings from no-FOP countries that cannot be hosted at Wikimedia Commons. For "Template:FoP-US", it has no forseeable use since "Template:FoP-USonly" has its own content and no longer uses this template. For photos of U.S. buildings, these can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons instead of locally hosting photos here (unless tagged with "keep local" templates, but files with "keep local" do not really need "Template:FoP-US" because it is very impractical).

This template was once kept at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 May 22#Template:FoP-USonly, over a different reason. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:23, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - The use of this template on enwp for an image does not affect the licensing. So the my question would be is there are use for it in managing files for transfer to Commons? When I checked, there are no transclusions of this template in file space. Have all files that had this template been transferred to Commons which is why there are none now? There is a corresponding FoP-US template on Commons. -- Whpq (talk) 19:33, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Whpq: it used to be part of {{FoP-USonly}}, until I modified the latter's content in accordance with my third suggestion at Template talk:FoP-USonly#Suggested revised wording. That explains it being no longer used at any extant files, since FoP-USonly has its own content now. For files need checking, there is {{Copy to Commons}} that can be used to verify files before transfer to Commons. It can be used to tag photos of U.S. buildings which are always acceptable at Commons. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:30, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - with no impact to licensing and no utility in assisting transfers to Commons, there is no need for this template. -- Whpq (talk) 03:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. It serves to tell users that the copyright in a building is irrelevant to pictures of the building. It's a useful reminder that they shouldn't be worried about building pictures' copyright status, unless there's an unrelated issue. 123.51.107.94 (talk) 04:29, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @123.51.107.94: in my knowledge the job of hosting U.S. buildings falls on WikiCommons. Enwiki is supposed to only host copyrighted buildings of no-FOP countries (the reformed {{FoP-USonly}} handles that). But for copyrighted U.S. buildings, these can be hosted on or transferred to WikiCommons instead, since U.S. has Commons-acceptable architectural FOP anyway. That is also in compliance with WP:NOTREPOSITORY ("keep local" files are handled by {{Keep local}}). The template {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} groups files needed for license verification, and photos that are too suspicious for transfer are best sent to WP:FFD forum. Therefore, I do not see any future use of {{FoP-US}} here on enwiki. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:18, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_December_19&oldid=1129849058"