Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 February 2

< February 1	February 3 >

February 2 edit

Template:Notre Dame Fighting Irish captains navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Notre Dame Fighting Irish captains navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NAVBOX #4. Pretty bad case of WP:NAVBOXCREEP. At a recent TfD on a copy of this template multiple editors concluded that both Notre Dame Captains navboxes should be deleted. Best, GPL93 (talk) 21:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. We don't need yet another class of navboxes to be transcluded onto bio articles. Jweiss11 (talk) 22:06, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I notice that we now have an article List of Notre Dame Fighting Irish football captains. However I'm still of the view that we can do without this template, per above. Nigej (talk) 18:08, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 01:45, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. Definite navbox clutter here. Ejgreen77 (talk) 06:00, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:I Burn edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:I Burn (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant. Template contains two songs, and both are already included in the Template:(G)I-dle navbox... if the articles are already in the navbox then there is no need to include Template:Extra track listing as well, as stated in the documentation for that template. Richard3120 (talk) 15:51, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Certainly doesn't seem needed for only two tracks which are listed in the {{(G)I-dle}} navbox. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:59, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a template which should not be used. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 17:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Special elections navboxes edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete -FASTILY 02:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Special Elections to the 111th United States Congress (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Special Elections to the 112th United States Congress (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Special Elections during the 113th United States Congress (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The templates are unused and all the pages that are mentioned in those templates are already in the 2009–2014 United States elections navboxes already, therefore making these three templates unnecessary. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 05:00, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Unused and seemingly a style of template no longer used. Nigej (talk) 14:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom – Muboshgu (talk) 18:47, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 17:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).