Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 June 8

June 8 edit

Template:MBTA Green Line full edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:39, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Never-used template. Far too complex for any useful placement in an article. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:56, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mission spreading Hindustani classical music edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:39, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, seems not very useful TheImaCow (talk) 21:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Move log edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:38, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, seems not very useful TheImaCow (talk) 21:12, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. I created this for a request at WP:RFPP (in which I found the template not useful after all before I submitted it), thought it might be useful for other pages as well, but the transclusions count appears to say otherwise. WT79 (Speak to me | account info) 08:45, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mountain West Conference border color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:21, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, seems not very useful TheImaCow (talk) 19:00, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mainpage date to come edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 June 15. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 17:45, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ISO 639-5/table-row edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) TheTVExpert (talk) 14:00, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Twelve-year-old template created by editor who has not edited in ten years. No links, no transclusions, no documentation. It looks like it should have been deleted as a result of this deletion discussion, with only the parent template kept as a redirect. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lausanne Métro s-line templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:58, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

s-line data modules

{{s-line}} templates for the Lausanne Métro. Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Lausanne Métro. All transclusions replaced. There are four dependent s-line data modules that should also be deleted. Mackensen (talk) 01:41, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).