Open main menu

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 September 1

September 1Edit

Template:Public holidays in the United StatesEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 September 15. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:04, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject PatnaEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:WikiProject India. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Propose merging Template:WikiProject Patna with Template:WikiProject India.
WikiProject Patna is listed as a subgroup of WikiProject India and doesn't really seem to be active anyway. There is no real need for this subgroup to have a separate banner when it can be handled as a parameter in the main banner. Necessary changes have been made at {{WikiProject India/sandbox}} with examples at Template:WikiProject India/testcases. All functionality of the existing banner will be retained while avoiding unnecessary duplication on talk pages. PC78 (talk) 11:49, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

  • PC78, theoretically yes, as the parameters are already present in the India template, I feel this can well fit into it, and we can avoid duplication. --Titodutta (talk) 17:16, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
    The parameters are not already present in the India template. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:21, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
    Perhaps he was looking at the sandox? PC78 (talk) 22:29, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Suport merge - No brainer. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:51, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • support - Well thought through, and tested in sandbox - seems pointless as is. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 20:39, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Support Put Patna as taskforce of WikiProject India.--Biografer (talk) 00:53, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Comment The parent project listed is Wikipedia:WikiProject Bihar. Wouldn't it be better to merge it to the parent?--Auric talk 21:34, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Support -- CptViraj (📧) 08:52, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Support merge - perhaps more specifically for the sub-project of WikiProject India which deals with the state of Bihar since that is where Patna is located but I am not sure if there is a template specific for it. Inter&anthro (talk) 15:17, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Support merge as proposed. Miniapolis 20:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Support merge as proposed. -- Magioladitis (talk) 19:21, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rowing at the 2020 Summer Olympics – List of Qualified NOCsEdit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:47, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

The template is only used in one location. I have merged the content of the template into the article it was being used in Rowing at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Qualification. This renders this template unnecessary, which is why I am nominating it for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Sportsfan 1234: First and foremost, you wanted the template containing the list of qualifies NOCs in canoeing and rowing to be deleted, and then leave the other sports remain. Why do you have to do that? It seems unfair and inconsistent. Think smarter please. Raymarcbadz (talk) 02:18, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Think smarter and review policy WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 13:40, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Excuse me. You wanted the templates to be deleted in rowing and canoeing. How about the other sports such as sailing, shooting, table tennis, cycling, equestrian, diving, and gymnastics? They are placed in their respective templates and have not been DELETED. Raymarcbadz (talk) 17:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
support deletion - if it's only used on one page (and will only be used on one page), it could easily be transcluded. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 20:41, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
delete has been merged Rowing at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Qualification#Summary, so no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 14:38, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).