Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 November 5

November 5 edit

Template:2016 NPSL Northeast - Atlantic standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete per this and multiple prior discussions. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:27, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY Frietjes (talk) 23:20, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:50, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:NLG edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was move to Module:Sandbox/Jeblad/NLG Primefac (talk) 04:05, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Although I'm not very familiar with the topic of this module, it is unused, and it appears to be a meta-module with no other module on-wiki containing code to call it. Given that, and that there have been no edits to it since 2016, it seems unlikely to accrue use. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • comment It is about generating text in natural language, it is a test, and it is unfinished. This version is copied to another repo. Note that modules that is only tested in the console will never be linked, and that the current configuration of modules makes it pretty darn difficult to test anything without adding it to the module namespace. Jeblad (talk) 20:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to sandbox Author has expressed interest in it so it shouldn't be deleted, but moved to the sandbox. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 12:44, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
If I wanted it to be moved to the sandbox I would have said so. Jeblad (talk) 00:58, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NAMESPACEID edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:09, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deprecated template, no longer used in the editnotice system after Special:Diff/915704304. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:08, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:LnkPr edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:09, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:19, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Soft delete Doubt it will ever be useful, but it should be open for refunds. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 12:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:JulianDay edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:10, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, broken (any attempt to call the module would produce a Lua error because fun is not defined). * Pppery * it has begun... 00:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Soft delete not functional, allow refunds though. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 21:19, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Thai Boys' Love Series edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 07:11, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We don't use navboxes to group unrelated films and TV programs just by subject/genre. Paul_012 (talk) 00:44, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Humans (TV series) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 November 15. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 08:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).