Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 February 2

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< February 1 February 3 >

February 2 edit

Template:Telford Tigers edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Duplicate nomination. See Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 January 29#Template:Telford Tigers. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 22:24, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with just one link. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:58, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:29, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. One of many British ice hockey templates. Even the 1 season that was created is simply two league tables. Nigej (talk) 09:48, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @WilliamJE, Tom (LT), and Nigej: This template is already nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 January 29#Template:Telford Tigers. Yosemiter (talk) 19:36, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Septa edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:11, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lightly-used wrapper for {{SEPTA stations}}, which is deprecated in favor of Module:Adjacent stations/SEPTA. Five articles or templates used it before I replaced it with the generic {{station link}}, which calls the LUA module. In addition, the template's name is ambiguous with the completely different {{SEPTA}} navigation template. Mackensen (talk) 17:16, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This template is a shortcut for {{SEPTA stations}} so it can be used in the main body of articles when linking to a station instead of having links redirect. This way also allows for possible future name changes. See how {{Cdots}} is used as a shortcut for {{CDOT stations}} on links to station articles on the Hartford Line article, for example. Thus, I believe this template should not be deleted, as it has more uses than just for s-line templates. –Daybeers (talk) 01:00, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Daybeers: Yes, and {{station link}} does the same thing. It's also a main body template and nothing to do with s-line. See also my comments on Template talk:Amtk. {{stl|SEPTA|foo}} and {{septa|foo}} accomplish the same thing, except station link uses the new data module and doesn't require separate maintenance. Mackensen (talk) 13:30, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

New Hope Branch templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:19, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

S-line templates for managing succession along the Reading's New Hope Branch, including the current heritage service. Functionality now in Module:Adjacent stations/New Hope and Ivyland Railroad and Module:Adjacent stations/Reading Company. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 16:02, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

SEPTA style templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:19, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Set of templates for varying the display of headers on {{Infobox station}} for various SEPTA stations. That functionality is now unified in Module:Adjacent stations/SEPTA. All transclusions updated. Mackensen (talk) 05:12, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bibliography of 18th- and 19th-century naval history edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:16, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, but I'm not sure if deletion is the way to go with this one, but it should definitely leave the "Template:" namespace. Maybe move without leaving a redirect into the "Wikipedia:" namespace? Steel1943 (talk) 01:50, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Transcription into Chinese edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:16, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete, including adding the content enclosed in the <noinclude> tags into the article Transcription into Chinese characters. Steel1943 (talk) 01:46, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fine if it goes into the main article as suggested. Onceinawhile (talk) 14:26, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • If the template gets substed and deleted, then we'll end up in the undesireable situation in which a substantial chunk of the content of one article is without attribution (see WP:CWW for the familiar reasoning). The template's history has to be preserved somewhere. I don't have a preference about where that should be, but if it's desired for that to be kept out of the template namespace, then the template could be turned into a redirect to the main article and moved to the article namespace (at a title that would make for a suitable redirect: maybe Table of transcriptions into Chinese?). – Uanfala (talk) 20:38, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Uanfala: Good point per how much edit history that template has. I totally support such an option. Steel1943 (talk) 21:30, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete or as per Uanfala for reasons of preserving template history --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:29, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Table of Crotalinae genera edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:21, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 01:37, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Serio Oriento-Okcidento edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:24, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 01:34, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete Only 1 transclusion but used some 50 times there. Converts a list of parameters into a row of a table. Seems overly complex for the rather simple purpose. Nigej (talk) 17:00, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Spectral efficiency comparison table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:25, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 01:31, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete per nom --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:29, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete per nom Pointless. Just substitutes text in one article. Nigej (talk) 17:02, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lithuanian parliamentary election, 2000 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:24, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused, and superseded by chart at 2000 Lithuanian parliamentary election#Results. Steel1943 (talk) 01:25, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Indonesian legislative election, 2009 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:24, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 01:09, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Macedonian presidential election, 2009 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:23, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 01:08, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Romanian legislative election, 2008 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:26, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 00:50, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Maltese legislative election, 2008 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:23, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 00:44, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Russian presidential election, 2008 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:23, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 00:43, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Vascular plant phylogeny edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:23, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One article-space transclusion. Substitute and delete. Steel1943 (talk) 00:40, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete per nom --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:29, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete per nom Nigej (talk) 17:07, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Seems like a lot of clutter to include in the article namespace, and substing would make it harder to use the template on other pages in the future. If it will be subst'd, then of course its references will need carefully incorporating into the article text. Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 11:38, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Pages in the "Template:" namespace are intended to be used in multiple instances and/or pages via transclusions and/or substitutions. This template seems exclusive to the page it is transcluded on and doesn't seem like it could be used efficiently in any other pages or articles. In addition, other similar pages, such as Euphyllophyte, have the related information coded on the page rather than in a template. Steel1943 (talk) 19:50, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Haors in Bangladesh edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:23, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NENAN, considering that this template contains only 2 non-red links. Steel1943 (talk) 00:37, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Can't say no. (put a smiley here, big one, a bit apologetic) Sorry for the trouble. I created it to be used on all the haor articles, and I inteneded to create those haor articles en mass. But I quickly found that information on individual haors are not easy to come by. So the project languished in inaction. My bad, though I still harbour the illusion of recreating it someday when the articles are ready. Please, delete. Aditya(talk • contribs) 01:02, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. No use currently. Nigej (talk) 14:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Can always be recreated as the haors articles are expanded. Thanks also to Aditya Kabir for your work and good intentions. --Tom (LT) (talk) 05:39, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:International rankings of Finland edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:22, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused in the article namespace. Steel1943 (talk) 00:32, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete not suitable for template namespace and as an article should be deleted as we are WP:NOT an almanac. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:25, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Pretty much the same thing is used separately at International rankings of Finland. I can't imagine much use for the same template elsewhere. --Pudeo (talk) 11:56, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Seems to have been superceded. Nigej (talk) 17:05, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_February_2&oldid=882689576"