Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 January 15

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< January 14 January 16 >

January 15 edit

Template:Japan Squad 2014 FIFA World Cup edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:09, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused fork of the squad in the squads article Frietjes (talk) 20:28, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ivorian parliamentary election, 2016 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:09, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused duplicates the results in the article Frietjes (talk) 20:27, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IskanderMakhmudovIndustries edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:09, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unused; would be better as a list article if this is accurate and needed Frietjes (talk) 20:25, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FC Edmonton squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:28, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the team is defunct Joeykai (talk) 17:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No need for a defunct team. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - there is no 'current' squad, so no need for such a template. GiantSnowman 10:54, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Alberta Floorball League edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:29, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

only used in one article Frietjes (talk) 16:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I do not see main article. No need to exist. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:46, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Palmares start edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Div col. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:33, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose redirecting Template:Palmares start to Template:Div col.
The Palmares start template is a feature-poor wrapper for Template:Div col that uses a deprecated parameter (number of columns) as its only input. It should be redirected to Div col so that people can use that template's additional features, like the colwidth parameter. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:52, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Yeproc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:34, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The only connection most of these bands/acts have with each other is this record label. Not a reason for a navbox such as this on all those individual artist's pages. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 20:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template should not be deleted because it makes sense for a smallish record label to have a template for easy navigation of its artists and the the other bands that share the same label on the artist's pages.Also see above.User talk:RythianMage 22:26, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can't people do that easily from Yep Roc Records? What reason would there to be for someone to link to The Soft Boys from Billy Bragg? --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The Main point of Navigation boxes is to make navigating easier, we could all just go to the original pages for all templates and waste time, but these provide people with easy related info that is easily accessible and saves time. 00:10 30 December 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RythianMage (talk • contribs)
They're great when they connect related articles, but two bands who happen to be signed to the same label may only have that in common. We shouldn't be cluttering up articles with these. Look how bad Of Montreal looks with 4 templates linking to other articles unrelated to the band itself. By the way, there is consensus that such use of record label navboxes should be deleted. See

Very well I still protest but seeing as it can cause clutter overuse should be avoided and i guess the only reasonable way is just to delete these types of templates instead of having to go on a case by case basis. 2:10, 30 December 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RythianMage (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:35, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 12:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bnr edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:34, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Acts like the 10,000 Maniacs and Elvis Costello have been associated with numerous labels throughout their careers. You wouldn't want navboxes such as this one created and placed in those articles for each of those labels to link to otherwise unrelated artists. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:16, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template should not be deleted because it makes sense for a smallish record label to have a template for easy navigation of its artists and the the other bands that share the same label on the artist's pages, also many record label artists share similar genres and styles which make more case for its relevancy.User talk:RythianMage 22:26, 29 December 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RythianMage (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:35, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 12:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mississippi State Bulldogs women's basketball coach navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep. Withdrawn by nominator, userfying to User:Jweiss11/Template:Mississippi State Bulldogs women's basketball coach navbox. (non-admin closure) Corky 16:00, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:EXISTING... only two active links. Corky 01:15, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2018_January_15&oldid=955580395"