Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 June 18

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< June 17 June 19 >

June 18 edit

Template:Pro-Chancellors of Liverpool John Moores University edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:19, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

only 2 links, unnecessary and does not aid navigation Aloneinthewild (talk) 21:23, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:America East Conference men's soccer coach navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 25. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:19, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Plph edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:11, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deprecated template from 2007. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:20, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I don't see any reason why this shouldn't be kept deprecated. That's the point of deprecation: it produces an error message if an editor attempts to use the template, and it gives a pointer to the template that they should use instead. – Uanfala 19:53, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:28, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Masculinism sidebar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Masculism sidebar. Feel free to merge anything important Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:11, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to Template:Masculism sidebar -- apparently self-consciously so, given the "related template" note at the top and display of the sidebar on many articles, just above/below the other. Part of a long list of dubious edits in this area that could use additional attention. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:42, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep It has a different design and has more topics than the other template. This sidebar is part of the Portal:Masculinism. It is better designed and has more topics on it, is more up to date. So if a template should be deleted, it should be the other template. Or it should be merged.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rævhuld (talk • contribs) 18:55, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete. If you think of improvements for an existing template, you should not do it by creating another template. The problem with that primarily is someone might use it, then there are two templates serving the same function, being updated, diverging and causing confusion. So make any improvements in the template sandbox, then propose your changes on the template talk page. Though frankly this is not better designed, it looks far worse with an unnecessarily garish design that should never be used in a template, and is very unlikely to be merged.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 20:14, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge: In principle we should change all references (in this template and others, and in the Portal name) from Masculinism to Masculism (which I marginally prefer because it's shorter) or vice versa, while ensuring that no links get lost in the process. I also prefer the gentler soft blue look of the masculism sidebar, but that's a minor point. The Masculism article already mentions Masculinism as an alternative name, and that seems adequate. Tlhslobus (talk) 20:22, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Activision Blizzard edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:10, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox with no transclusions at this time. This was an attempt to merge {{Blizzard Entertainment}} and {{Activision}}. The author proceeded to transclude it in many articles. ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10] and more.) The merger was contested by Masem and ferret. (Is it relevant that both are admins?) Codename Lisa (talk) 06:23, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I had a reasonable discussion with both users, and we've all unanimously agreed to remove the template in the basis that the correlation between Activison and Blizzard Entertainment is minimal at best, and that the generalisation of categories works to the template's disadvantage. There was no ill will throughout the discussion process. I propose to Delete. Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 10:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and Iftekharahmed96's own message. The short of it is, while both companies are owned by the same holding company, they operate and are known independently of each other. They are not generally discussed together or viewed as a single topic area. -- ferret (talk) 13:10, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WGA strike edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 25. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:10, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SocialismOpenTask edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:10, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Security alert edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:10, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, probably not a problem Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Section blanking edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:09, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, we have other templates that say the same thing Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:58, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as it's a subst-only template that gets used [11]. – Uanfala 09:17, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Search subpages edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:09, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused variant of {{Archive banner}} Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:58, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Seattle Mist roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:08, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, almost all redlinks Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:57, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SW edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:08, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, we have other warning templates now that say this better Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SOTD empty edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:08, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, Sound of the Day is defunct Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:53, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SNL Cast Timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:08, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and outdated Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:53, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SDLR edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:08, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, all redlinks Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:53, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SCOTMregular edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:07, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, project is defunct Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:52, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rosenbauer Vehicles edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:07, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, fails WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:49, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Roads of Jakarta edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 25. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:53, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:River City Raiders roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, contains no links Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:47, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Revolution topics edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 25. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Restricted address section intro edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:09, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, seems overly specific Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:44, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I created it back in 2010, am not currently sure what happened (whether its text was incorporated into something else which was widely used, whether it was widely used itself or not, or what). I moved it to my user space just now and request deletion of the redirect left behind. --doncram 05:18, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Religion in India edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, hardcodes article content and outdated refs Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:42, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Refbb edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirected to {{BBREF}}. Frietjes (talk) 15:50, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, goes against our citaiton style Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:40, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • What do you mean by "goes against our citation style"? – Uanfala 09:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • It doesn't go against our citation style. It cooperates with it, since WP legal style favors use of Bluebook style. This is the same issue TenPoundHammer raised for an equivalent template the other day. This template is necessary. Ten pound, why don't you do something useful like researching and writing articles, instead of bothering people with trivia like this? I strongly oppose the DELETE proposal and this line of activity, and if continued it will interfere with the writing of legal articles on court decisions. PraeceptorIP (talk) 22:06, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{Refbb}} A template such as this belongs before the footnotes for a legal article. You should consult the people who write legal articles in WP. And perhaps you should stick to areas of WP in which you have knowledge and experience. Please check your spelling, too, because citaiuton is not a word in English. PraeceptorIP (talk) 22:06, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Radium series edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:52, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused hardcoding Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RXNO edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:51, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused citation Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:33, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RWBY Chibi characters edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:51, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template, seems to be fancruft Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:32, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Provmap all edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:51, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:12, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Provincial museums of Canada edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 25. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:51, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Protection msg edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:51, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused protection message from 2006 Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:11, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Proposed deletion notify-NPF edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:51, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, redundant to {{Proposed deletion notify}} Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:10, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Per docs, that template is used in the PageCuration toolbar (New Pages Feed). It is always subst'd. Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 03:03, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I used it all the time at PageCuration. scope_creep (talk) 11:01, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep it is used with Page Curation. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:44, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Prodblp-request edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template, blanked for no reason Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:04, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ponchielli operas edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar, fails WP:NENAN anyway Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Political Parties invite edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused invite template for defunct project Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:41, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Poetry Project Collaboration edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused collab template from 2009 Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:40, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Piirissaare Parish edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, all redlinks Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:23, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PUF-npd edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused warning from 2008 Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:21, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, as PUF has been retired. Stifle (talk) 11:44, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PLCOTWC edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, collaboration of the week for Poland is long defunct Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:18, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PIIRreview edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject specific Peer Review template, unused and untouched Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:15, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Oldies Radio Stations in Delaware edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only links one article Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:08, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:OFFICE talk edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 25. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Numchange edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused warning from 2006 Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Notvio edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. WP:NOT is so broad scope that this template explains nothing. There are far better templates out there Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:35, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nospeculation edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused from 2006 Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:15, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Norwegian quick links edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused from 2007 Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:14, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Non-free-lists editnotice edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, overly specific Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:03, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete This was one of mine and created for a particular issue some time back, can go now. Black Kite (talk) 10:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Non-free-lists edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:35, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, overly specific Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:02, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Neutral user talk edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Humorous, but unused Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:47, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nationalliga Team edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, we have much better team infoboxes now Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:27, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, old, unused, and redundant infobox. Frietjes (talk) 17:33, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NYCS-bull-small edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and deprecated Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:21, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NS Heritage Series edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, all redlinks Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:19, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Without corresponding articles to add context to it, it is nothing but patent nonsense. Or, wait... maybe, it is just fancruft, a list of stuff that only interests those who know exactly what it is. Wait! If they know exactly what it is, are they still interested in it? Of course, it is our WP:NAVBOX that says navboxes must have no red links. —Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 06:35, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Actually, the NAVBOX page does not say that navboxes cannot have red links. It says that red and blue should only be used as link colors and that red and blue should not be used as background or other text colors. That being said, however, the information presented in this template is listed in Norfolk Southern Railway#Heritage fleet and it seems unlikely right now that any of the individual locomotives listed therein would, at some future date, become notable enough to surpass the WP:GNG. It is for the notability of the subject matter that I would agree with the delete discussion. If the individual locomotives become notable, we can add articles at that time. Slambo (Speak) 11:13, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The template links individual locomotives owned by Norfolk Southern painted in the schemes of "fallen flag" (defunct) railroads acquired by Norfolk Southern. It's unlikely we'd ever have individual articles about any of these topics. Mackensen (talk) 20:29, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NRR edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:48, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, hardcoded text. No need to have a template for this. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NPWgranted edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:48, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Corresponding project is defunct Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:07, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NISSUI edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:48, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, contains only one link Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. It is some sort of table but what is it? Sure, I can tell that the table is in the navbox style. Still, what is it? —Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 06:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2017_June_18&oldid=1073610226"