Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 April 21

< April 20	April 22 >

April 21

Template:Notts County L.F.C. squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:43, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Notts County L.F.C. squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Club no longer exists Telfordbuck (talk) 18:06, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete, defunct = no current squad. Frietjes (talk) 12:48, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2TeamBracket-Tennis3NoSeeds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:57, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2TeamBracket-Tennis3NoSeeds (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

now redundant to {{2TeamBracket-Tennis3|seeds=no}} Frietjes (talk) 19:46, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:16TeamBracket-Compact-Tennis7-NoSeeds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:16TeamBracket-Compact-Tennis7-NoSeeds (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

now redundant to {{16TeamBracket-Compact-Tennis7|seeds=no}} Frietjes (talk) 17:35, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unnecessary now. Mohsen1248 (talk) 19:01, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:16TeamBracket-Compact-Tennis5-NoSeeds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per author approval Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:55, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:16TeamBracket-Compact-Tennis5-NoSeeds (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

now redundant to {{16TeamBracket-Compact-Tennis5|seeds=no}} Frietjes (talk) 17:32, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unnecessary now. Mohsen1248 (talk) 19:01, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:8TeamBracket-Tennis5-NoSeeds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per author approval Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:8TeamBracket-Tennis5-NoSeeds (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

now redundant to {{8TeamBracket-Tennis5|seeds=no}} Frietjes (talk) 17:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unnecessary now. Mohsen1248 (talk) 19:01, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:4TeamBracket-Tennis5-NoSeeds-with 3rd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per author approval Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:52, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:4TeamBracket-Tennis5-NoSeeds-with 3rd (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

now redundant to {{4TeamBracket-Tennis5|seeds=no}} Frietjes (talk) 17:27, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unnecessary now. Mohsen1248 (talk) 19:01, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support as original uploader, except to point out the replacement is actually {{4TeamBracket-Tennis5-with 3rd|seeds=no}}--Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 22:22, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keith Edkins, yes, thank you. although, one amazing thing about LUA is that {{4TeamBracket-Tennis5|seeds=no}} will also show a third place match if you include the teams for the match. so, most of the 'with 3rd' templates are redundant as well, but I decided to tackle these in batches. if you have time, could you (or anyone else watching) comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis#Tennis bracket templates? Frietjes (talk) 12:47, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Shooting Stars

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:44, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Shooting Stars (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough links to provide useful navigation. Rob Sinden (talk) 15:53, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NENAN. Why even bother with one link? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:01, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:46, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Neopaganism-sidebar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Neopaganism (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Neopaganism-sidebar with Template:Neopaganism.
Reasons: 1. they are the same template, with the same content, being different only in structure and location; 2. the sidebar template that I have proposed to merge is used in a smaller number of pages than the other; and ultimately, 3. the sidebar template is cumbersome. 82.48.45.216 (talk) 13:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support. In my opinion, navbars are infinitely more useful and less cumbersome than sidebars, which can be at best unsightly and at worst disruptive to a good page flow and appearance. — Huntster (t @ c) 15:39, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support: be rid of the sidebar, merge it into the bottom bar. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:32, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2018–19 Eredivisie table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:08, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2018–19 Eredivisie table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Too soon per policy: see WP:CRYSTAL. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:37, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2021–22 Eredivisie table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:10, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2021–22 Eredivisie table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Too soon per policy: see WP:CRYSTAL. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:36, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).