Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 May 25

< May 24	May 26 >

May 25 edit

Template:WikiProject Texas A&M edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. The template is unused and there are no strong objections to deletion. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:41, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Texas A&M (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Recommend deletion of this template. The associated WikiProject is inactive, there are no articles associated with this template, the function of this template has been replaced by Template:WikiProject United States. Additionally the articles are associated to WikiProject Texas as well. Kumioko (talk) 23:25, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure if it should be deleted or it should be a redirect to the new template. Oldag07 (talk) 00:37, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Its already redirected to the new one using a wrapper template. Kumioko (talk) 03:11, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I see that. I am not sure about the benefit of completely deleting the page, as compared to leaving it the way it is just for historical reference. I certainly am not stuck on this position, and I can be convinced if you give me a reason why it would be better to completely delete the page rather then leaving it the way it is. Oldag07 (talk) 13:26, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well to be honest I just don't see this project being active on its own. Even if it breaks away from WPUS at some point I would probably fall under WikiProject Texas. So the need to have a separate template for the project is minimal. Kumioko (talk) 01:56, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel that strongly about deleting it, by all means delete it. I think there is some use keeping the page the way it is, just for the improbable, but possible event that someone might need to look at the template's history sometime in the future. Oldag07 (talk) 05:22, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject CKY edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleted per WP:CSD#G8 by Explicit (talk · contribs). (non-admin closure) Jenks24 (talk) 07:54, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject CKY (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is no longer used and the associated WikiProject has been deleted. Kumioko (talk) 23:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FWT edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, these appear to be single use templates with no documentation, now replaced by simple text color templates. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 23:39, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FWT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:FWTE (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

because everyone knows that FWT = bold blue and FWTE = bold green. Frietjes (talk) 23:10, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are there more of these? Are they encouraged elsewhere? Or is the use of the infobox at Fort Worth Intermodal Transportation Center as a train schedule a one-off? Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 07:09, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FurtherReadingContent edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:49, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FurtherReadingContent (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

no need for a template (or an icon) here. Frietjes (talk) 23:09, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ftd edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:00, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ftd (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

almost unused and redundant to {{icon}}. Frietjes (talk) 23:07, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FP-star edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:57, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FP-star (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

almost entirely unused and redundant to {{icon}}. Frietjes (talk) 23:00, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Forced new line substitute edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:45, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Forced new line substitute (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

old, unused formatting template. Frietjes (talk) 22:50, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Football assistant manager list entry edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:54, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Football assistant manager list entry (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

old and unused. Frietjes (talk) 22:47, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 20:02, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FMP2end edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:48, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FMP2end (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant to Wikipedia:Featured Music Project/end. Frietjes (talk) 22:45, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fitchburg Route edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:53, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fitchburg Route (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

old and unused. Frietjes (talk) 22:38, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FAC-link edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:52, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FAC-link (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

does not appear to be actively in use (only used in an inactive project). Frietjes (talk) 22:12, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Experimental-note-1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:39, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Experimental-note-1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

old ref/note experiment. Frietjes (talk) 22:05, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:IC edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:39, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:IC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:EXTB (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

easier to just generate the links without a template. Frietjes (talk) 22:03, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Philippine Supreme Court composition row edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:37, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Philippine Supreme Court composition row (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Philippine Supreme Court composition court lifespan (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Start Philippine Supreme Court composition (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:End Philippine Supreme Court composition (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

now replaced by a more standard {{navbox}} system. Frietjes (talk) 21:05, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:El Maestro edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:37, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:El Maestro (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

old, anonymous user signature template. Frietjes (talk) 20:02, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ein edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:33, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ein (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

replaced by {{edit}}. Frietjes (talk) 20:01, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:EEmap edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:32, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:EEmap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused EL template. Frietjes (talk) 19:55, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ECHL map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:32, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ECHL map (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

we don't need a template for this. Frietjes (talk) 19:53, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:E-Sports Squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:29, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:E-Sports Squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:E-Sports squad player (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:E-Sports Squad mid (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:E-Sports Squad shift (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:E-Sports Squad end (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

single use template. Frietjes (talk) 19:48, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dnote edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:26, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dnote (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

failed experiment, superseded by other citation methods. Frietjes (talk) 19:25, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete unused ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 13:13, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DNBaux edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:25, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DNBaux (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 19:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DNBauxJohnKirk edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:25, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DNBauxJohnKirk (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

single use template. Frietjes (talk) 19:13, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Djurgårdens Hockey edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:21, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Djurgårdens Hockey (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 19:13, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And it is unused because it is useless. Delete. Reso lute 03:00, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DNB lkpl edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:15, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DNB lkpl (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:EB1911 Link (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant to a simple wikilink, probably related to DNB. Frietjes (talk) 19:11, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DEchar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:14, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DEchar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 19:02, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:DBZ Saga NavC2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:13, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DBZ Saga NavC2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

obsolete. Frietjes (talk) 19:02, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Chennai-expressway-routemap edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:55, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chennai-expressway-routemap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unnecessary.Frietjes (talk) 17:29, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:BritFlag1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as redundant to {{ListFlag}} Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:55, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BritFlag1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:BritFlag2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant to {{flagicon image}} with size=100px. Frietjes (talk) 16:59, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It might be redundant to {{ListFlag}}, but both are a heck of a lot easier to use than flagicon image and take up less space. ListFlag and BritFlag1 (which are identical) are all set up and impossible to get wrong. Flagicon image is flexible but you have to know what you are doing to use it and most ordinary users are not going to want to have to learn all the technicalities before being able to create or edit a flag list.

(BritFlag2 is redundant; that was only created to deflect a troublesome editor who has long since gone away.)

Howard Alexander (talk) 19:04, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

even better, redundant to {{ListFlag}}. thank you. Frietjes (talk) 19:17, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Box If edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:55, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Box If (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

obsolete. Frietjes (talk) 16:51, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Book version edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:54, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Book version (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

doesn't save much in terms of typing (see also film version). Frietjes (talk) 16:49, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't save anything in terms of typing. If you use the pipe trick, then this will always be longer to type than just linking the thing directly. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:56, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Blahg-day edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was userfy Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:54, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Blahg-day (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Blahg-head (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Blahg-section (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused outside of userspace. suggest moving to userspace. Frietjes (talk) 16:46, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:BHE Stepped Piston Engine edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:54, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BHE Stepped Piston Engine (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unnecessary external link template. Frietjes (talk) 16:35, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:BC date edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:53, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:BC date (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

easier to just type BC after the date. Frietjes (talk) 16:28, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AtariAge edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted by author. 28bytes (talk) 00:39, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AtariAge (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant to AtariAge. Frietjes (talk) 16:09, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Clothingcats edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was substitute and delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:53, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Clothingcats (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

used for basically one day to add a note to talk pages. suggest substituting it and then deleting it. Frietjes (talk) 15:46, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Quaid-e-Azam Trophy edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:53, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Quaid-e-Azam Trophy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox with only one blue link and 58 red links. SocietyBox initially tagged it for speedy deletion as CSD T3 with a rationale "all red links except two" but it is not a duplication/hardcoded instance of any other template. jfd34 (talk) 15:09, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not enough working links. Frietjes (talk) 21:03, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Antrim Under 21 Football Team edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:52, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Antrim Under 21 Football Team (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only one bluelink, doesn't navigate anything. Also not too sure that an under 21 championship is that notable anyway. WP:NENAN. Jenks24 (talk) 11:19, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete, not enough working links. Frietjes (talk) 21:03, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Awake (TV series) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:40, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Awake (TV series) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Do we really need a template for a show that has articles on only two episodes and has since been cancelled? Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:47, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Template for program that was never even close to getting a second season. No justifying it. Nate • (chatter) 17:08, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The templates I create usually have more in them and are for more notable shows. This template was created AFTER the show was canceled and the creator should've known better. The only way to improve the template is by adding the writers of the series, but I stand by my previous statements. It's category is pointless as well. — WylieCoyote (talk) 23:05, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The template contains 4 articles related, and more can possibly be added to it, the current articles are seen on the updated version, there are now 4, not 2 articles. Tate Brandley Stockwell 20:54, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Enough links to justify a template and category. --Another Believer _(Talk) 16:48, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I expect the episode articles to be compressed to a "List of...episodes" article soon enough because of the program's short run, as the episode articles are solely sourced to recaps, thus cutting half the template's links. Then you get rid of the production companies and another unrelated link I have removed (NBC doesn't do Must See TV anymore and I don't understand why that one hasn't been locked up now that the branding is purely historical), and you have just the show article and producer...way not enough for a template. Nate • (chatter) 05:44, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I'm going to jump in here and say that this has enough links to justify staying. Besides, User:TBrandley has been working on promoting several of the articles to GA. The argument that the show won't have a second season therefore is not notable is silly, because not having a second season does not mean that there is no need for a template.--Gen. Quon (talk) 02:21, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:48, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. --Boycool † (talk) 01:14, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: There are now seven articles related directly to the show, two of which are GA. Navigating between them would be so much easier with this template. Just because it was cancelled doesn't mean we can't have navigation between articles. Kevinbrogers (talk) 18:46, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PMCID edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 05:39, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PMCID (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused & Template:PMC is actually used. AManWithNoPlan (talk) 00:35, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete Unused. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 13:41, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.