Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 161

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 155 ← Archive 159 Archive 160 Archive 161 Archive 162 Archive 163 → Archive 165

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kannankarankudi Sree Dharma Sastha Temple

I, Shiri85, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Shiri85 (talk) 09:44, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done I'm sorry, but substantial parts of the article were apparently copyright violations from various official sources. The only part that wasn't copyvio was the opening to the article, which is as follows:
Sree Dharma Sastha Temple'Sree Dharma Sastha Temple'Sree Dharma Sastha Temple'Sree Dharma Sastha Temple'Sree Dharma Sastha Temple'Sree Dharma Sastha Temple'Sree Dharma Sastha Temple is a 500 years old Hindu temple situated in Kannankarankudi, Thirumayam, Pudukkottai District, Tamil Nadu,India. It is one of many temple built for Sree Dharma Sastha in India. Many sub-deities presence in this temple and among them are Palaiadi Vinayagar, Agora Veerabathrar, Moolamalaiandi, Panniveerapar Swamy, Bhairava, and Peraiyur - Naganada Swami. There was no Kumbabisheham held from 1954 until 1996. On 1st September 1996 Kumbabisheham was held followed by 4th December 2008 after a gap of 12 years.
I would otherwise have no problem restoring it, but the copyvio is so massive that there's really not much we can do here. The only thing I can recommend is that if you are an official spokesperson for the temple, that you ask the temple to file a ticket through WP:ORTS that gives Wikipedia permission to use the material. I do have to caution you that in most cases the copyrighted text is usually too promotional to use in a neutral Wikipedia article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:30, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Jacky Newcomb

this person is a public figure and the information was true and acurate -109.158.62.188 (talk) 12:27, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

  Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacky Newcomb, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Joe Decker (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 13:54, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andrew Listermann

Unable to get the page to go live and then click the "Save page" button below -Kilville (talk) 19:55, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

  Not done The page is far too promotional, basically trying to say how great that person is. I would suggest that you use WP:AFC process instead if you are willing not to promote the person. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:30, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Um, @Graeme Bartlett:, it is at AFC, and the section heading indicates that the AFC draft is what @Kilville: requested for restoration:
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andrew Listermann · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
I observe that it has already been G13-deleted twice. Normally we'd decline requests after multiple G13 deletions without a followup from the requester, however in this case it seems the requester is the second author of the draft, who created it from scratch it after the first one was deleted. It's basically still a first-time delete (for that author). Therefore:
  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:08, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Patras wireless metropolitan network

The page was deleted under speedy deletion (A7). The page is not to promote an organization but rather to provide information and geographical and historical facts about "Patras wireless metropolitan network", which is one of the many networks listed in List of wireless community networks by region -Pwmn (talk) 16:10, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

A7 is about notability, not promotion. Even so, the article appeared to exist for publicity purposes.
  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user FisherQueen (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:40, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Leadership Directories, Inc.

I, Asaf Soof, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Asaf Soof (talk) 15:19, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:42, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

A massive Street Technology, Sports and Entrainment event that will create jobs for 5,000 Youths

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Richmondbash (talk) 21:57, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

  Please repair your request - we cannot process malformed requests. Please use the code {{subst:refund|pageName|reasoning}} (replacing pagename with the name of the page you wish to have restored and reasoning with the reason for your request). ~Amatulić (talk) 22:14, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Village At Leesburg

I, TDG-EZ, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TDG-EZ (talk) 20:20, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:38, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Polandball

Page is still protected, even though the article has been restored to mainspace today at DRV.  The request is to remove protection. -Unscintillating (talk) 19:04, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Um, you do know that's what WP:RFPP is for, no? And why do you want to remove protection? The DRV case restored the article for the purpose of listing at AFD. Your statement on the talk page that you intend to move the article to Draft space is counter to that decision. I'm open to this but I need a better reason than I'm seeing so far. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:20, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
(1) I've never seen RFPP used for removing page protection.  Your question implies that I am willfully circumventing WP:RFPP, which is WP:ABF.  (2) The DRV closing states, "I assume this will quickly be brought to AfD, and that's fine."  So charging me of trying to do something counter to that decision is WP:ABF #2, when what I am trying to do is consistent with the closing, and is to allow the editors who want to improve this article time to work without also contending with an unnecessary process, meanwhile keeping an article that needs improvement out of mainspace, which are all win-win effects.  (3) A bold move is normal editing, and should be able to be reverted by any editor who objects.  So your objections are that I would do normal editing.  (4) Your preliminary decision was that this was the wrong forum, and now you are engaged in procedures that prevent me from doing anything other than wait for your decision.  (5) The last time you delayed in making a decision here, it took you most of a month to decide whether or not there was a non-controversial decision.  I patiently allowed you to go through your process, but it was never clear why you had so much difficulty in making a decision.  Unscintillating (talk) 21:08, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Wow. Talk about assuming bad faith, which I did not do. I merely asked questions.
WP:RFPP has a section on requesting reductions in protection. It's there although most folks use that page to request increases in move or edit protection.
You might try asking the closing admin of his intentions, which would be better than either of us trying to interpret them. Our interpretations are clearly opposed. I'm basing mine on whole decision including the final sentence, not the single sentence you quoted. If he has no objection to moving it to Draft, then neither do I. But I believe it's completely unnecessary to take a nice article like that out of the searchable main space.
I have no objection to anyone doing normal editing. You have not provided enlightenment as to why this cannot be done in the main space article. What is preventing you from improving it, if that's what you want to do? The page is not protected. Go for it. If anyone takes it to AFD (which I doubt), there's still ample time to make improvements. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:19, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
At this point your arguments are broken down, and you choose rhetorical devices that, whether or not by design, create enough delay that if there is anyone working on an AfD, that that AfD will get preference over my proposed improvement.  The administrator of record is Sandstein, and I had to make the decision as to whether to make the request there, or (incorrectly instead of RFPP presumably) to come here.  The absence of a decision here is not a reason for me to go forum shopping.  Unscintillating (talk) 22:04, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
You should be experienced enough here by now to know that administrators don't override decisions that might be regarded as controversial without first involving the admin who made the decision. You have not notified Sandstein that you desire his protection lifted so that you can unilaterally remove a perfectly good article from main article space without any consensus from those who are already working hard to improve it in main space. That seems pretty controversial to me.
There is no absence of a decision here. Your request is   Declined. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:34, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for making a decision.  I was not aware of any controversy when I came here.  At least three editors specifically argued for the unsalting of draftspace at the DRV.  There is no logical basis to keep draftspace salted after mainspace is unsalted, and seems to be the kind of complexity that happens so rarely that it was overlooked by the DRV closer.  A WP:BOLD edit is one of the ways of determining consensus on Wikipedia.  The premise that I attempted to move a good article to draftspace against the will of the editors involved is without a foundation, and I will assume that the comment was a result of haste rather than intent.  Again, thank you for making a decision.  I have pinged Sandstein at Talk:Polandball.  Unscintillating (talk) 20:13, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
I did not intend to imply that you tried to do something against consensus. Perhaps I should have used the word "discussion" instead — that is, I saw no discussion with respect to moving an actively-edited article to draft space. If I missed that, I apologize. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
In the sequence in WP:BRD, a bold edit precedes the discussion.  Draftspace is a place for the active editing of articles.  Had another editor immediately moved the article back to articlespace, I would not have had an objection.  Thanks again for the decision and fixing the protection.  Unscintillating (talk) 02:57, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

User:Ducky3926

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ducky3926 (talk) 05:07, 13 November 2014 (UTC) I learned my lesson plz don't deleat page I will use it for talks thx

  •   Not done and will not be done I'm sorry, but I can't see where you've learned your lesson at all. Your page was deleted and you quickly set about trying to re-introduce the same elements to your userpage again. Not only that, but I fail to see where you've made any helpful edits to Wikipedia in general. At best you're using Wikipedia as a webhost and at worst you're just here for general mischief. I'm sorry, but it really doesn't look like you're here to contribute to Wikipedia at all. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:56, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DN Capital

I, Charleskrz, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Charleskrz (talk) 15:19, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

(This request was placed at the location of the deleted page and submitted to AfC. Rankersbo (talk) 07:07, 13 November 2014 (UTC))
  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:19, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks A Lot, Milton Jones!

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Pozzitive (talk) 11:34, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

I have only just seen the deletion because of the fgact that it was the same text as our website. I should have attended to this before, apologies, but my assistant didn't mention to me at the time.

To allow the text to go on the page, i have now submiited a Copyright permission email thus:

I hereby affirm that I, David Tyler, Company Director of Pozzitive Television Ltd, producers of the BBC Radio 4 show "Thanks A Lot, Milton Jones!" and owners of the website www.pozzitive.co.uk am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the text:

(copyvio removed)

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the free license: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. David Tyler

I hope this resolves the issue. Thanks in advance. david

  Not done, nothing to do. The page is not deleted, nor is it being proposed for deletion. Whatever copyright issue existed, has been removed.
Furthermore, we cannot rely on the word of some random Wikipedia account claiming to be the owner of the copyright. You need to send your declaration of consent (see WP:CONSENT) to the Wikimedia Foundation from an address that verifiably belongs to you, and if you have no such address, you must prove you control the copyrighted material by placing a specific statement on the website where the material is found. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:16, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shifu Ramon Careaga

I, ShifuC, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ShifuC (talk) 18:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

I had not logged on in time, but was not notified in any other manner. That was why I missed the deadline. I am not finished with this article. Most Universiteis don't publish diplomas etc... online, so it is difficult to cite the education section.

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:49, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

User:ShifuC/Shifu Ramon Careaga

Article was being sourced, was not yet completed; it was not that it was abandoned, it is that Universities rarely post degrees online. Personally it doesn't seem reasonable to expect a citation for degrees, I have not seen that for other persons, the rest of the article was cited very dutifully. It took time to create this article the right way, please restore it so that it may be completed. As I did not receive notice until today this seems hardly the right way to handle the matter. -ShifuC (talk) 18:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. This was deleted because it got moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shifu Ramon Careaga, which has been restored per your request immediately above. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:49, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Thanks A Lot, Milton Jones!

I, Pozzitive, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pozzitive (talk) 11:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. It already exists in main space. See below. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Frosae Wine Sorbae

The Frosae Wine Sorbae page is not being used as an advertisement. It was modeled after other frozen dessert companies page and therefore is the same as for example Ben and Jerry's page. It was also supported by outside articles. If there is a difference, can I please understand the difference. Thank you! -Chrissip (talk) 14:29, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

  Not done, but feel free to ask the administrator who deleted it, DGG.
It doesn't matter what it was modeled after. Each article stands or falls on its own merits regardless of what else already exists. The purpose was for publicity, which was obvious from the text, with subjective product descriptions like "rich, robust", "light, fruity", unnecessary detail more appropriate to a product brochure, etc. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:44, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Your article was essentially an advertisement, and not bad as an advertisement; since it seems to be distributed in my area,if I see it I might even try it, but after all, that's exactly the purpose of an advertisement. It even included the legal disclaimer statement that is required by law to be placed on alcoholic product advertisements; it included mention of the display of the product at local parties, it referred to the product and its various forms using adjectives of praise, it was sourced almost entirely to your own web site and to unreliable local sources known for publishing mainly or entirely press releases. Even the one true source used mentioned it only as a local-give away among a long list of other promotions. It was concluded with a statement. that the company hoped to expand to regional distribution. Even if written in a promotion-free version, it would have no chance of being accepted, because of the lack of reliable sources for notability. If you ever become sufficiently well known to have references from good sources, it might be possible to write an article. At that time, please take my comments for suggestions about how to go about it. By the way, I personally consider the tone of the Ben and Jerry's article could use some improvements, but many editors have worked on it over many years, not a single person with an apparent conflict of interest. DGG ( talk ) 00:53, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MD Buyline

I, Healthcare.technologist, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Healthcare.technologist (talk) 19:12, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:12, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Jennifer Strickland

I see no reason for this page to be deleted. I have worked hard on this page and was still working on it when it was deleted. I wish we could have handled this in a better manner other than deleting my page before I even had a chance to fix whatever problems there were. please restore, thank you. -588userd (talk) 21:02, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

I have to ask, what is your association with the subjects you've been writing about? Are you aware that if you have an association, you must disclose it publicly? You agreed to that when you created an account here.
  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user NawlinWiki (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:16, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Jeffrey Einhorn

This is not advertising, the individual in question is a prominent, well-known attorney who represents multiple famed defendants. More explanation on that may be provided if necessary -M159AMG (talk) 21:08, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. It was deleted twice on the same day, the first time in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 for failing to assert a credible claim of significance, and the second time in accordance with WP:CSD#G11 for being promotional. As such, it is ineligible for restoration by request on this page. Take it up with the deleting administrator, NawlinWiki, and if he declines to restore it, you may take your case to Wikipedia:Deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:19, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Anita Fuentes

This page is about a real person and the significance of what she does. -588userd (talk) 20:41, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Being a real person, or doing something that doesn't garner significant coverage in reliable independent sources, are not reasons to keep an article.
  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user NawlinWiki (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:14, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
@588userd: You already have a version of this at Draft:Anita Fuentes (2). Please continue working on it there. If it is not accepted to main article space, then you can't expect it to survive (which it didn't).
Also, please answer the question in the section immediately below regarding your association with these subjects. If you have an association, you should be using Wikipedia:Articles for creation in any case. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:32, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

User:Dan Koehl/sandbox

I, Dan Koehl, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dan Koehl (talk) 01:02, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

  Done, page restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:26, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Thank you! Dan Koehl (talk) 04:13, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Chakvi Mandeer

Hi Chakvi Mandeer is not about a resl person . It is Yaar(village) in India. So please fo not delete it my friend -IVillager (talk) 22:57, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

It isn't deleted... yet. Something like that has no business in main article space though. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:24, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Tyler Gulyas

For the reason of general amusement, and non-formal biography writing rights, along with the consent of the biography's target Mr.(rich homie)Gulyas. -QuanHomieRich (talk) 01:19, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

  Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. We do not require or need permission from the subject for a Wikipedia article, and such permission does not trump Wikipedia's policies, especially WP:Notability and WP:Biographies of living persons. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:29, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
  •   Not done and will not be done I'm sorry, but Wikipedia is not a place to upload comedic pages about someone. Like Jeremy said, the person would have to pass notability guidelines to merit a page. Consent doesn't play into articles unless the person wants to have their page removed and they're only on the edges of being notable. I'll go ahead and give you fair warning: if this is all you're going to do on Wikipedia, create funny pages, then you run a serious risk of being blocked, either temporarily or permanently. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:10, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Rick McDaniel (2)

I, Mattigan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mattigan (talk) 16:24, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:54, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

The Forty Rules of Love: A Novel of Rumi

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Umairbukhari1 (talk) 17:04, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

  Declined. This was a book review, essentially a blatant advertisement, not an encyclopedia article. It would need to be rewritten entirely from scratch to be acceptable. If you are somehow associated with this book, please use Wikipedia:Articles for creation to submit your article for review. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:57, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

S._Ravi_(producer)

Genuine — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muktharavi (talk • contribs) 18:42, 14 November 2014‎

  Declined. That isn't an encyclopedia article. It isn't even coherent. Please work on drafts in your sandbox. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:01, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Marty Watt in Valencia, Spain 2012.jpg

Permission for this picture has been received in OTRS. Please restore temporarily to enable ticket verification as it seems that nobody with enwiki admin rights intends to handle the ticket. -Ankry (talk) 10:56, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

@Ankry:   Done. Cheers--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CASRAI

I, Pigsonthewing, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I want to see if there's anything I an salvage and merge into Consortia Advancing Standards in Research Administration Information. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:13, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

@Pigsonthewing: Hey Andy. It was a blatant copyvio. If you want to see the content just head on over to here, here and here. It had no other content at all, not even any salvageable coding you could use to save time like an infobox. (I really think we need to round up all the AfC reviewers and remind them to check, I mean this screamed copyvio ["We provide..."] and it went through three different AfC reviews and declines and no one noticed.)--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:26, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
OK, thanks. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:52, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James Arthur Cumming East

I, Cosmic-antidust, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cosmic-antidust (talk) 11:45, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

I was not aware that sandbox does not save drafts and this was not intended to be a finished encyclopaedia entry. I have not saved the information that I wrote into sandbox elsewhere. Please, I really would like it retrieved. As soon as it is retrieved, I will copy contents to my own documents, remove from the sandbox and then delete the article until it is ready to post. Many thanks -Cosmic-antidust (talk) 11:49, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:21, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

J. Merridew

Please don't delete this page, instead could you improve it for me? -Procrastinator16 (talk) 22:35, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

ASUSTOR

I would like to retrieve the deleted material for further improvements. -Vincentatast (talk) 06:26, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done Not only was this deleted via WP:A7 (which we typically do not restore on RfU, but the extent of the content was "ASUSTOR is a manufacturer of Network-attached storage equipment。" There's really not anything to restore. I'd probably recommend working on a copy in your sandbox or at AfC, as opposed to creating it in the mainspace. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:53, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Philips_Lumileds_Lighting_Company

This is a major company in the field they are in and their LEDs were used in the retrofit lamp that received the very first $10,000,000.00 US Department of Energy awarded L-Prize. If necessary, page deletion or content modification should be decided by experts in the LED Lighting Industry who is also familiar with Wikipedia and it's purpose. -Volkan Yuksel (talk) 19:06, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

  Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G11. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. Even if experts in the field had decided this (we don't require such because it would lock an article down as a result), I very heavily doubt they would have gone with wording which serves no purpose other than promotion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:17, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
  Done Deletion was bad, so I restored it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:39, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

ricinine

Two researchers remember reading this article on wikipedia concerning a single molecule but now it seems to be missing. We can find the article in German but we would like to find it in English. The article sited a research that seemed somewhat questionable in a sense that the results could be real but conclusions and reasoning might be based on too narrow perspective. It is now in our interests to track down this research and restoration of this wikipedia article might help us. Thank you. -128.214.173.250 (talk) 13:36, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

  Not done. There is a mention in Ricinine nitrilase, but we have never had an article Ricinine. The German one is de:Ricinin, but we have never had an article at Ricinin, either. Can you make any guess at what the title of the article you read might have been? JohnCD (talk) 16:46, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Mickey_sheen

I, GypsySpirit, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. GypsySpirit (talk) 14:01, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

@GypsySpirit:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:00, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Project Lead The Way

I, PLTWjennifer, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. PLTWjennifer (talk) 14:24, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:32, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

arihant holidays

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Rameshrealmadrid (talk) 15:06, 17 November 2014 (UTC) I am really confused why admin is removing my article. I didn't use any links to advertise or promote the particular company. You can see the details on Nepalese tourism board regarding this oragnization. thank you

  Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G11. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. External links aren't the only way to promote; the article's content in and of itself may be non-neutral or otherwise slanted to make the company look good. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:13, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
Agreed. You'd have to re-write it from scratch. Unquestionably promotional, looking more like a company brochure than an encyclopedia article.
Furthermore, you appear to have a connection with the subject. Please start over at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. This request is therefore   Declined. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:34, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/United States Police and Fire Championships

I, CheliM, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CheliM (talk) 20:33, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

  •   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:41, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

File:RisingSun2012.jpg

Permission received via. OTRS (Ticket:2014081110016931. Please ping me if undeleted. ---Mdann52talk to me! 13:02, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

  Done @Mdann52: Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:18, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Draft:The Painted Lily

I, Iapplew1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I know it is not fit your criteria just yet but I am hoping to at least retrieve the draft content. Iapplew1 (talk) 14:58, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

@Iapplew1:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. For advice, read Wikipedia:Your first article and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction. JohnCD (talk) 17:33, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Munpack (Unix)

This redirect pointed to an article that was apparently inappropriately deleted. A bot ended up deleting this redirect after the target article was deleted. Now that the target article is restored, I would like to request for this redirect to be restored as well. Thanks in advance. -dying (talk) 21:49, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

  Done, no problem, but you could have saved a lot of time by simply recreating the redirect yourself. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:53, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stephen Beckett Productions

Dirprodsb (talk) 02:17, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:17, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Erigga

Thanks for this opportunity, permit to say the deleted article is a biography of a living Nigeria recording artist. "Save page" button below -DDluv09 14:11, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

@DDluv09: Yes, a non-notable living recording artist. See WP:BAND for the criteria that a musician must meet before meriting an article here. Therefore...
  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Materialscientist (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:46, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

We Love, Therefore We Share 平等分享行動

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Sapphirekam (talk) 14:51, 19 November 2014 (UTC) My article - We Love, Therefore We Share平等分享行動 has been speedily deleted. The reason given for deletion is that, the article is about an organization or company, and no explanation is given why the topic is significant. I am writing to defend against the article, and request for undeletion.

Instead of an organization or company, ‘We love, Therefore we share’ is a campaign organized since 2012, aims to help the needy in the society. What makes it different from other similar social caring campaigns is that apart from spreading the value of sharing, it aims to change the mainstream distorted value in Hong Kong by actions. In Hong Kong, there are full of property hegemony and monopoly of large-scale chain store. The campaign in accordance to this, promotes the idea of supporting small shops. All the materials purchased must be bought in small shops so that the money can be distributed to the small shops, which are facing challenges. People who join the campaign will also buy the unsold canned food intentionally, to deliver a message to people that we should not judge things and people based on their appearance.

Apart from the meaningful message spread by the campaign, the scale of it should also be considered. There are a lot of people all around joining this campaign, and the campaign itself has arousing public and media attention. It was a successful activity, which are still ongoing till nowadays since 2012. The originators are pleased to see the participants taking action by themselves afterwards. The happening situation is often described as “uncontrollable”, as more and more citizens are self-organizing campaigns in about 12 districts already.

  Declined. Unfortunately, none of what you wrote above constitutes an assertion of significance. And none of it suggests that the campaign is notable by Wikipedia's definition: See WP:Golden rule for an overview. You might try making your case to the deleting administrator that WP:CSD#A7 does not apply to campaigns, but a good argument can be made that a campaign is an organization.
Even so, your article was not deleted due to notability. It was deleted as unambiguous promotion in accordance with WP:CSD#G11. You can try appealing to the deleting administrator User:Bbb23.
However, you still have the draft version Draft:We Love, Therefore We Share 平等分享行動, which has not been deleted. Work on improving it and submit it to Wikipedia:Articles for creation, which is the only realistic venue for someone with a WP:Conflict of interest such as yourself. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:55, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Yves Bole

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Marybangbang (talk) 14:08, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

@Marybangbang:   Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Amatulic (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.. See WP:MUSICBIO for the notability standard for musical performers. JohnCD (talk) 22:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Seishi Juku Karate

I, 74.67.220.218, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 74.67.220.218 (talk) 12:34, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Question: I can't find any deleted page by that name, either in Article or Draft or AfC space. Please give the exact title of the page you mean. Capitalisation is significant. If you had a notice about it, copy and paste it here from that notice. Alternatively, tell us the username of the account that created it, so we can look in their deleted contributions. JohnCD (talk) 22:22, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Gledden

I didn't delete it - but would like it back please. -Tennisbuff12345 (talk) 12:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

@Tennisbuff12345:   Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:25, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Full Moon (MATTE event)

This page was deleted because it was associated with "Matte Projects", a page which since then has been undeleted as neither page follows Wikipedia's criteria for deletion -OliverZD (talk) 16:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

  Not done, nothing to do. The page is not deleted. It is currently a redirect to MATTE Projects, and the full history of contributions under the redirect is still available.
@OliverZD: Please refrain from making any edits to either article yourself, in accordance with Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guidelines.
Also, when you created an account here, you agreed to disclose your conflict of interest publicly, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. Please add this disclosure to your user page. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:43, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dimasoup

I, DmitryKsWikis, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DmitryKsWikis (Dmitry K.) (talk) 07:25, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

@DmitryKsWikis:   Not done. The subject for a Wikipedia article needs to have Wikipedia:Notability, which means references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Unless you assure me that you can provide such references I will not restore this, because if it is just about a sort of soup you invented and put on Youtube it has no chance of making an acceptable article. See Wikipedia is not for things made up one day for more explanation. JohnCD (talk) 22:50, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

nexB

I, Pierrelapointe, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pierrelapointe (talk) 18:54, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:57, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Georgia King

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ivan E Clarin 11:02, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi I,m Ivan E Clarin requsting for undelete page of Georgia King page problem i edit the page of the article image i fix the problem issue Thank You.Ivan E Clarin 11:02, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

@Ivan E Clarin: the article has not been deleted, and is not proposed for deletion. What is your problem? JohnCD (talk) 13:17, 19 November 2014 (UTC)


No problem it,s ok. ?question do delete all image I uploaded or not.Ivan E Clarin 13:43, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

@Ivan E Clarin: It is not clear what you want. Typing your question in your own language into http://translate.google.com and translating to English may help.
Are you referring to your uploads, listed at Special:ListFiles/Ivan_E_Clarin?
If so, all of them will be deleted automatically on 25 or 26 November 2014. To prevent them from being deleted, you need to disclose on 0each file: where did they come from? Who is the source? Who is the photographer? Who owns the copyright? By what license are you permitted to distribute these photos? If you are not the photographer or copyright owner, then the copyright owner needs to provide the Wikimedia Foundation with permission to use those images. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:36, 19 November 2014 (UTC)


Its ok do it but I will do my best to help you that verify that a consumer resource.Ivan E Clarin 02:08, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

How did microsoft become the successful company that it is today?

I was uneducated on the copyrights/website and didn't realize that I the page was posted as an offical page, meaning I thought it was still in my sandbox. Furthermore, I'm requesting to have the content of my page back so I can edit it and repost it without violating any rules and regulations, or copyrights. This is a page i'm creating for a school project. I apologize for the inconvenience and going against the rules, it wont happen again. -Jscha034 (talk) 02:42, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

  •   Not done, @Jscha034: I'm sorry, but even if we ignore the whole issues with copyright we still have a bigger issue: this page is wholly redundant to the pre-existing article on Microsoft. (This is actually the main reason that the article was restored, not copyright issues.) Even if we restored it, the article would still end up getting deleted because it doesn't expand on the article we already have. I'm not opposed to sending you a copy via e-mail, but in the end this page would still have to be deleted either way. A much better alternative would be for you to go to the article on Microsoft and ask how you can help further expand the article (while explaining your topic) or for you to create a "fake" Wikipedia page on a site like Wikia for the project. If your teacher has not already made a project page for the course or asked questions at WP:EDUN, I'd highly, HIGHLY recommend that he or she does this. Offhand I can't see any page at the institutions list for Old Dominion University (as you gave your ODU e-mail address on another editor's talkpage), so I would highly recommend that he set one up, since it seems like they haven't done this. We do try to work with students, but we're not a place for people to create pages for grades when those pages would not be considered in any way sustainable after the class is over. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:21, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Robert Daniel Ryan ( Artist )

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Johncurtispaz (talk) 02:28, 20 November 2014 (UTC) asserted importance in comics and cartoon and graphic art and social media

  Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user TomStar81 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:52, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • @Johncurtispaz: It also appears to have been very close WP:COPYVIO from this page. Please understand that we cannot accept copyvio and that while you can submit a ticket to WP:ORTS giving us permission (I assume that you were asked to create a page by Ryan), the material was also fairly promotional in tone. Even if you give the content up as fair use, it would still need to be re-written. Other than that, I can't see where the guy is really all that notable. He exists and runs a business, but offhand I can't see where that business or his work has received any coverage in independent and reliable sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:57, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

User:Seishijuku/sandbox

I, 74.67.220.218, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 74.67.220.218 (talk) 06:51, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:57, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/J. Gerald Hebert

I, Geg42, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Geg42 (talk) 03:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:58, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Debian project leaders

Although these articles were rightly deleted because the individuals lack notability, the role of the Debian project leader is notable and a list of Debian project leaders would be an improvement. I am sure that those deleted articles have salvageable content that would help an editor to work on this list. -84.127.115.190 (talk) 05:53, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

  Done. I have restored the salient content from the deleted articles to list of Debian project leaders. ~Amatulić (talk) 07:24, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Draft:International Tourism Partnership

I, Franh123, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Franh123 (talk) 17:02, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, could I have access to the page I was creating? I could do with seeing it to review the feedback and determine if I am going to edit it. I put a lot of work in and would like to get that back, regardless of whether you are going to publish or not - thanks!

  Not done given the strongly-worded decline of this submission. The article contains too much evidence of conflict of interest, including copyright violations. It is basically an advertisement.
Are you User:ITP123 who created that article? ~Amatulić (talk) 17:25, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_161&oldid=1083424700"