Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2008 November 2

< Wikipedia:Files for deletion
(Redirected from Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2008 November 2)
< November 1 November 3 >

November 2 edit

Image:Vistanetwork.jpg edit

Image:Vistanetwork.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Simxp (notify | contribs).
  • Non-free image fails NFCC. Fails NFCC#1, easily replaceable (or not even needed) and NFCC#8, adds nothing relevant to the articles it's in. -Nard 01:14, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Teambatistachart.jpg edit

Image:Teambatistachart.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jenevip (notify | contribs).
  • Copyright probably wasn't owned by uploader. PhilKnight (talk) 02:34, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gary-saved.jpg edit

Image:Gary-saved.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rdwest2005 (notify | contribs).

Image:Rfc-money-order.jpg edit

Image:Rfc-money-order.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rdwest2005 (notify | contribs).

Image:Rhcp.PNG edit

Image:Rhcp.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xihix (notify | contribs).

Image:Rhesus 04.jpg edit

Image:Rhesus 04.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bazzlad (notify | contribs).

Image:Rick Springfield 10 06 07.jpg edit

Image:Rick Springfield 10 06 07.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Annede54 (notify | contribs).

Image:Rick Springfield001.JPG edit

Image:Rick Springfield001.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mcjunkmail (notify | contribs).

Image:Rickprofile2007.JPG edit

Image:Rickprofile2007.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Reactionary89 (notify | contribs).

Image:Ridingalan.jpg edit

Image:Ridingalan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lolitapixiechick (notify | contribs).
  • Unused image. Not sure of what - CD cover? Summary says "I own the copyright for this image as I took the picture and am in the band". Comment on image says "Get on yer bike and ride..." Soundvisions1 (talk) 04:35, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Riter2.jpg edit

Image:Riter2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Graciegirl49 (notify | contribs).

Image:River raid certificate 2.jpg edit

Image:River raid certificate 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pcusumano78 (notify | contribs).

Image:Rkj pic1 002.jpg edit

Image:Rkj pic1 002.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gerunimo (notify | contribs).

Image:Robert Carmine.jpg edit

Image:Robert Carmine.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mar1211 (notify | contribs).

Image:Robin-1-at-Boys-home.gif edit

Image:Robin-1-at-Boys-home.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by FoodForthePoor (notify | contribs).

Image:Robo.jpg edit

Image:Robo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pramenath (notify | contribs).

Image:RoddyWoomble.jpg edit

Image:RoddyWoomble.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Egg Creations (notify | contribs).

Image:Roguecampaignposter.jpg edit

Image:Roguecampaignposter.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ghengiscohen (notify | contribs).

Image:Roll On Columbia.png edit

Image:Roll On Columbia.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Peteforsyth (notify | contribs).

Image:Roly e3 august 2006.jpg edit

Image:Roly e3 august 2006.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Roly e3 (notify | contribs).

Image:Romeo.JPG edit

Image:Romeo.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by B-Rich (notify | contribs).

Image:Rosanna.JPG edit

Image:Rosanna.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Streetangel22 (notify | contribs).

Image:Rosapietroiusti.jpg edit

Image:Rosapietroiusti.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fundraiser96 (notify | contribs).
  • Unused image. Most likely orphaned. Summary says Alice Christov Moore, acquaintance Soundvisions1 (talk) 05:57, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Logo Calderon Administration.png edit

Image:Logo Calderon Administration.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by EOZyo (notify | contribs).
  • Not the official seal of the Federal government, just a temporary logo that adds nothing to the President's biography Esteban Zissou (talk) 10:00, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The official seal is the National coat of arms, this is the Institutional image of this Presidency (not a "temporary logo") and it goes in all the paperwork of the Executive Power and its dependencies, which use a customized logo based upon this model. Besides this, the story of how the Institutional image was "restored" to the full coat of arms ("slashed" during the Fox administration) was an important event in Mexican politics, making the image revelant to the article.
  • Keep Government seals are public domain under Mexican law. I am going to move this to Commons with correct licensing. -Nard 19:47, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:020 17A marcoaponte.jpg edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Keep. This found an obvious use in the imageless Marco Aponte. Please check more closely before declaring images to be of no encyclopedic value. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:43, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:020 17A marcoaponte.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Carlo de lima (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:05-12-MX Tetzco Esplanada.jpg edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: - Keep - has a home now (seems Illmari is correct) - Peripitus (Talk) 07:37, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:05-12-MX Tetzco Esplanada.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nq04 (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:05-12-MX Tetz Baño Rey.jpg edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: - Keep - has a home now (seems Illmari is correct) - Peripitus (Talk) 07:37, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:05-12-MX Tetz Baño Rey.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nq04 (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:06 Han With Fish.JPG edit

Image:06 Han With Fish.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kborland (notify | contribs).

Image:-23GroupMercuryCover3.JPG edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: - Commons'd to Image:GroupMercuryCover3.JPG - Peripitus (Talk) 07:40, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:-23GroupMercuryCover3.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DianeLytwyn (notify | contribs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:HAJMUT.jpg edit

Image:HAJMUT.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Brooks1138 (notify | contribs).
  • orphaned image, sole contribtuion of user, unencyclopedic personal photo Jordan 1972 (talk) 17:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DSCF2849.jpg edit

Image:DSCF2849.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Deejaydom (notify | contribs).
  • orphaned image, absent uploader, only contributionis to this image and the resume text added Jordan 1972 (talk) 17:14, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Stonewalldb.gif edit

Image:Stonewalldb.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sdedeo (notify | contribs).
  • Single panels of a comic can be fair use, but not entire strips. PhilKnight (talk) 17:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep this strip won a Pulitzer, it's very much fair use. -Nard 20:48, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the .gif; keep the new upload (a .png file of a single panel from the comic in question.) This seems in better keeping with fair use. (n.b., I'm the original uploader.) Sdedeo (tips) 20:54, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Db701026.gif edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: - Keep - Strip appears commented on in the article and no real deletion reason offered - Peripitus (Talk) 07:43, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Db701026.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JohnDBuell (notify | contribs).
  • Single panels of a comic can be fair use, but not entire strips. PhilKnight (talk) 17:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The very first strip, does indeed qualify as fair use. -Nard 20:49, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:CharlesBlunt.jpg edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete Fails WP:NFCC1. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:37, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CharlesBlunt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Timeshift9 (notify | contribs).
  • Copyrighted headshot of a living Australian. (I've tried to nominate this pic before but the nomination got incomplete.) Damiens.rf 17:48, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Good claim for fair use already on image. Rebecca (talk) 06:56, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Really? What do you think about this claim of irreplaceability: "A pictureaustralia.org and images.Google search reveal no other photo of Blunt whatsoever, there are no copyleft alternatives of such a photo"[2]
    And the rationale goes on with some blatant lies, like that "the photo and its historical significance are the object of discussion in the article" and some other non-senses, like saying that the person featured on the photo "is no longer in the public domain" and that the image (a headshot) shows a "major event in significant person's life"
    Rebecca, as an admin, make Wikipedia a favor and try to keep some distance from non-free content policy issues. --Damiens.rf 12:33, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Keep It looks already appropriately tagged prior to nomination and seems bordering on disruption, seeing that nominator has had history of bad faith edits. --Arnzy (talk · contribs) 07:32, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - meets NFCC criteria and appropriately tagged for fair use. It is NOT used on the subject's biography page which would be in breach of NFCC criteria; it is used on a separate page to do with a party the person was involved in. Also bordering on disruption to renominate this. JRG (talk) 12:26, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Why is it replaceable the subject's biography but no on "a separate page to do with a party the person was involved in."? --Damiens.rf 00:55, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • This is faulty reasoning. Just because it is not on his article does not mean it passes NFCC. Either way (talk) 01:30, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong delete does not meet NFCC. There is absolutely no reason for this image to be used in that article. He is mentioned once, in the party leaders list. In no way does the article make critical commentary about the subject of the image that warrants this photo. Additionally, he is a living figure and, as such, a free image is feasible to obtain. Either way (talk) 01:30, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is not feasible to obtain. You cannot think like an American and consider it is easy to get. Blunt is not in public life anymore. JRG (talk) 02:18, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
According to the article, Charles Blunt, he is still working so I presume he leaves his house pretty frequently and attends public events as part of those jobs. either way (talk) 02:22, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I gotta agree with Damiens and either way. on the failure of NFCC -- He is not a reculuse, the image in no way has historical significance, and just because an image does not currently exist does not mean it is appropriate to use a non-free image. Many people on WP believe no image is better then a non-free one.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 02:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per .--Jordan 1972's comments. Fails NFCC #1. "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose." While there may be no images available, one could be created. --AussieLegend (talk) 05:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, while an image of Blunt now could presumably be acquired, it would not be appropriate to have a modern image of Blunt on the page of his political party (National_Party_of_Australia), given that his appearance is presumably rather different, and for the reasons enunciated in the Fair Use rationale. NFCC therefore does not apply as any image that we could create of Blunt would not serve the same encyclopædic purpose as this image. Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:20, 5 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]
    • What purpose did it serve to the article? As I noted, all it was was a picture of him that had the caption of his name and when he served. The article also had his name in a list. There was no critical commentary gained through the usage of this image. either way (talk) 02:03, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Detour sign.JPG edit

Image:Detour sign.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Angrygamer (notify | contribs).

Image:Aasisvinayak.jpg edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete It's of decent quality, so I was considering keeping it per Lifebaka. However, the licensing is extremely suspect and I'm guessing it's a copyvio. No use keeping an unused image that's a potential legal liability, especially when we have about a million photos of moustaches already. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Aasisvinayak.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Karthika.kerala (notify | contribs).
  • This image of a guy with a mustache became orphaned since his bio was deleted. Damiens.rf 20:02, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The GFDL tag on it looks kosher. If it is, send it to Commons. No point deleting a perfectly good free image. Cheers. lifebaka++ 16:22, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • What use would be that on commons? Moustache has enough pictures already. --Damiens.rf 16:34, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Hungarian derivative table.png edit

Image:Hungarian derivative table.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cserlajos (notify | contribs).
  • Not used. Damiens.rf 20:18, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please keep - non-use is not a reason for deletion. Put it on Commons if it isn't used, don't ust delete it; there are no copyright problems here. JRG (talk) 00:47, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • To quote the guidelines for IFD: "State the reasons why the image should be deleted. Some common reasons are...Orphan - The image is not used on any pages in Wikipedia."
    • If someone is volunteering to upload it to Commons, I add to the wish list that an SVG version should be made and the source for the information should be provided. --Damiens.rf 00:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as orphaned and unlikely to be used. either way (talk) 02:33, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:YorkshireFlag2008.gif edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: - Keep - a true and accurate (as this appears to be) rendition of a public domain work is subsequently public domain. It has been variously expounded that, no matter how skillfull, slavishly copying something that is PD does not add a layer of copyright over the top. The sites (c) notice DOES apply to text on the page however - Peripitus (Talk) 07:49, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:YorkshireFlag2008.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Howard Alexander (notify | contribs).
  • Copyright violation[3], also a free svg version is available on commons anyway. S Acaster (talk) 23:23, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: I can't find any explanation on their site regarding the licensing of their images. Can you enlighten me how this image is a copyvio? ~~ [ジャム][talk] 23:48, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep: Original voter has not come back and answered my query, therefore I see no reason why the image should be deleted. ~~ [ジャム][talk] 08:22, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The image of the flag is straight from the Flag Institute's "UK Flags Register". A condition of registration is that the flag design be freely available and subject to no copyright claim. I suspect that the one on Commons is the older version, not the official, registered flag.
Howard Alexander (talk) 22:38, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as above how can it be subject to copyright? To quote from the Flag Institutes site - Criteria for inclusion in the Flag Registry - The design must be in the public domain, ie. not subject to copyright. Keith D (talk) 21:51, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: The design is not copyright, but the specific image file is copyright because Howard Alexander simply clicked "right click save" on an file which is owned by the Flag Institute website. There is nowhere that says on the website that the specific file hosted on the website is public domain, infact there is a "©2008 The Flag Institute" at the bottom. S Acaster (talk) 14:06, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Image:Bwbuscard_small.jpg edit

Image:Bwbuscard_small.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Brian.a.wilson (notify | contribs).
  • Used on a speedy deletion nominated user page (as spam). Image is a scan of a business card so questions regarding license as well. Jordan 1972 (talk) 23:45, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Leti01.jpg edit

Image:Leti01.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dianceht (notify | contribs).
  • image used on a speedy deletion nominated user page as spam; no proof that the uploader can license the image under GFDL Jordan 1972 (talk) 23:55, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Leti02.jpg edit

Image:Leti02.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dianceht (notify | contribs).
  • image used on a speedy deletion nominated user page as spam; no proof that the uploader can license the image under GFDL Jordan 1972 (talk) 23:56, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nariz.jpg edit

Image:Nariz.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dianceht (notify | contribs).
  • image used on a speedy deletion nominated user page as spam; no proof that the uploader can license the image under GFDL Jordan 1972 (talk) 23:56, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2008_November_2&oldid=1039767045"