JRG

User:JRG

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia 
Dear editors,

JRG has decided to retire from Wikipedia. There is one primary reason for this, but I thought I would share some comments on Wikipedia in the hope that some things can be done to improve the encyclopedia. I am sorry if these are generalisations (because there are exceptions to every rule here and I have been editing with some great editors who deserve a lot of credit - and there are lots of good editors) but this is how I feel at the moment:

I am primarily retiring because I am sick of disruptive editors running around destroying the good work that others have done. There seems to be a persistent stream of them - the first couple are thankfully gone but the current one has been left to run free. As an example, some editors spent hours helping Australian political and legal articles by adding images under old guidelines, only for that work to be destroyed by one editor in particular by disruptive IfD nominations for reasons which aren't even valid reasons for deletion. This user persisted in edit warring, and whenever confronted he merely blamed others for his misfortune. The editors was also allowed to persist in abusing other users and getting away with incivility. When I reverted (among other disruptive edits) abuse levelled at another user I was reported. That was the last straw. I cannot participate in a website where this sort of behaviour is tolerated.

Some other comments:

• Subjectivity - I am also disappointed with the subjectivity of deletion debates. There are too many people who expect a Google search to come up with all answers to notability for an article and expect that if so many google sources can't be found that it is sufficient to delete an article. In many cases it is books and library research that would reveal otherwise. (Note I am not talking about obvious cases here or hoax articles). The entire process needs to be overhauled and more editors need to start doing some research on the notability of articles rather than relying on one's own subjective judgment.
• Lack of cooperation - I feel that editors are less cooperative about improving less-notable articles than they used to be. This is disappointing.
• Ownership of articles - there are too many articles "controlled" by one editor that deter other users from editing on particular pages.
• Image policy - Wikipedia's image policy is too harsh to take into account Australian conditions. American users simply do not understand the difficulty of obtaining photos of Australian political figures compared to how easy it is to get one over there. The policies, and overseas editors, need to take into account the regional differences.

I have enjoyed contributing to particular pages but I would prefer a lengthy break from Wikipedia. I will still contribute some photos at Commons and may reregister to add them here. Thank you to those who at least have made this an enjoyable time here and good luck contributing to the Australian encyclopedia. JRG (talk) 02:23, 4 November 2008 (UTC).

Rail lines

The common name is 'Main North' and 'North Coast' lines. MrHarper (talk) 01:25, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

• Sounds a good compromise. MrHarper (talk) 02:17, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Pity

Pity you feel you have to leave. I've had trouble with some editors too, the kind who act as if they own articles and are always deleting other people's contributions. You can choose to avoid them but it's not right that they can drive other editors away from particular articles. The system doesn't always help much. I was being stalked by one particular person, but no-one was interested because it didn't fit the definition of Wikistalking, even though that editor was very destructive, and still is.

Hope you can sort it out.

Sardaka (talk) 13:04, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Reconsider?

I am really sad to read this - although I understand the reasons, in particular on the image policies which border the ridiculous sometimes. Hope you reconsider. - Mafia Expert (talk) 18:05, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

CR Draft timetable

I've never been a fan of putting timetable-like information on these pages, not only is it not very encyclopaedic but is so subject to change that whenever a new timetable comes out, someone needs to be prepared to go through 300-odd station pages and change the information. MrHarper (talk) 21:32, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

You and yourself

I asked for an outside contribution here. You may be interested. --Damiens.rf 14:01, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Why?

...have you told all and sundry that you have retired when it is quite obvious that you haven't? Just an innocent question.Endarrt (talk) 21:44, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bayview Park link

Template:Bayview Park link has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Nightridemap.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nightridemap.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:27, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ruchir Punjabi

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ruchir Punjabi , has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruchir Punjabi (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Codf1977 (talk) 11:37, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Overland line link

Template:Overland line link has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:29, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Judge alt

Template:Infobox Judge alt has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WOSlinker (talk) 16:15, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there JRG, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:JRG/Flags of micronations.

• See a log of files removed today here.
• Shut off the bot here.
• Report errors here.
• If you have any questions, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:RonChristieplan.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RonChristieplan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:44, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:MLR station

Template:MLR station has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sw2nd (talk) 21:22, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Sydney closed station

Template:Infobox Sydney closed station has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sw2nd (talk) 04:13, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sydneyclosedstationnav

Template:Sydneyclosedstationnav has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sw2nd (talk) 04:13, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of North Warnervale railway station

The article North Warnervale railway station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

an unreferenced proposal for something which may never exist

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusoe8181 (talk) 05:00, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Main Southern railway line, New South Wales

I would welcome your input on Proposed changes to Main Southern railway line, New South Wales and its associated route diagram template which you created or substantially expanded. Dbromage [Talk] 08:06, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:NSW TrainLink Station alt

Template:NSW TrainLink Station alt has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sw2nd (talk) 15:28, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Sydney Trains station

Template:Infobox Sydney Trains station has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sw2nd (talk) 15:29, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Metrotranslogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Metrotranslogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 12:44, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of New South Wales railway station codes

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of New South Wales railway station codes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mqst north (talk) 04:41, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of New South Wales railway station codes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of New South Wales railway station codes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of New South Wales railway station codes (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AussieLegend (✉) 15:14, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Start Sydney Ferries box

Template:Start Sydney Ferries box has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 20:07, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Taronga Zoo Ferry link

Template:Taronga Zoo Ferry link has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 04:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Public transport infrastructure in New South Wales

Template:Public transport infrastructure in New South Wales has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:03, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sydneyferries Wharf

Template:Sydneyferries Wharf has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sydney Ferries route

Template:Sydney Ferries route has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:04, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Taronga Zoo Ferry colour

Template:Taronga Zoo Ferry colour has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:49, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Katoomba railway station

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Katoomba railway station requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/heritageapp/ViewHeritageItemDetails.aspx?ID=5012061. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Leschnei (talk) 13:48, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Sydneyferriessign.png

The file File:Sydneyferriessign.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Cityrailsign.jpg

The file File:Cityrailsign.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SydBus Route Operator

Template:SydBus Route Operator has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:19, 18 January 2022 (UTC)