Washington Redskins name controversy
The Washington Redskins name controversy involves the name and logo of the Washington Redskins, a National Football League (NFL) franchise in the Washington metropolitan area. Native Americans have been questioning the use of the name and image since the 1960s, while the topic has received widespread public attention since the 1990s.
Native Americans demanding change include tribal nations, national tribal organizations, civil rights organizations, and individuals. The largest of these organizations, the National Congress of American Indians, counted the enrollment of its member tribes as totaling 1.2 million individuals in 2013. According to the American Psychological Association as of 2010, over 115 professional organizations representing civil rights, educational, athletic, and scientific experts have published resolutions or policies that state that the use of Native American names and/or symbols by non-native sports teams is a harmful form of ethnic stereotyping that promotes misunderstanding and prejudice, contributing to other problems faced by Native Americans. In response to the possibility that the team could return to the District of Columbia in a new stadium, a coalition of nine civil rights organizations issued a statement in August 2018 that such a move should not be made "unless the team agrees to drop the 'R-word' racial slur as its mascot."
The Washington, D.C., team is only one example of the larger controversy, but it receives more public attention because modern dictionaries define the name as derogatory or insulting and because the team represents the nation's capital. Public awareness of the issues has been growing based upon social science research on the harmful effects of stereotyping. The number of high school and college teams using the Redskins name has been declining steadily along with other Native American mascots. There is also a growing number of public officials, sports commentators and other journalists advocating a change.
As well as picketing and other forms of direct protest, opponents took legal action to cancel the trademarks held by the team. On June 18, 2014, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) voted to cancel the Redskins federal trademark registrations, considering them "disparaging to Native Americans". The cancellation was affirmed in 2015 by the judge in a first appeal by the Redskins. However, in June 2017 the Supreme Court of the United States came to a unanimous decision in a different case, ruling that not allowing disparaging names to be protected by trademark registration is an unconstitutional infringement of freedom of speech, thus voiding the legal basis for the cancellation of the Redskins' trademarks.
Support for continued use of the name has come from the team's owners, management, the NFL Commissioner, and a majority of fans, which include some Native American individuals. Supporters say that the name honors the achievements and virtues of Native Americans, and that it is not intended in a negative manner. Some, such as team president Bruce Allen, also point to the use of Redskins by three high school teams, two on reservations, that have a majority of Native American students. Supporters have asserted that a majority of Native Americans are not offended by the name based upon a national poll by Annenberg Public Policy Center in 2004. In a commentary published soon after that poll, 15 Native American scholars collaborated on a critique that stated that there were so many flaws in the Annenberg study that rather than being a measure of Native American opinion, it was an expression of white privilege and colonialism. Specific criticism of the methodology includes the use of self-reporting to identify Native Americans, which violated the basic principles supporting the validity of public opinion polling. In May 2016, the Washington Post published a poll that duplicated the central question posed in 2004, yielding an identical result.
In 1933 the football team that shared both the name and playing field with the Boston Braves baseball team moved to Fenway Park, already home to the Boston Red Sox. Co-owner George Preston Marshall changed the name to the Redskins, more likely to avoid confusion while retaining the Indian imagery of the team than to honor coach William Henry "Lone Star" Dietz, whose identity as a Native American was debated. The logo for the NFL Braves was similar to the current logo, a Native American head in profile with braids and trailing feathers. The current logo, proposed by Walter Wetzel, a former Blackfeet tribal chairman and past president of the National Congress of American Indians, was introduced in 1972 and is modeled after the likeness on the Buffalo nickel. Members of the Blackfeet tribe express a range of opinions, from support to indifference to strong opposition to the Redskins name based upon their personal experiences.
Advocates of changing the team's name say that stereotypes of Native Americans must be understood in the context of a history that includes conquest, forced relocation, and organized efforts by federal and state governments to eradicate native cultures, such as the boarding schools of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. "Since the first Europeans made landfall in North America, native peoples have suffered under a weltering array of stereotypes, misconceptions and caricatures. Whether portrayed as noble savages, ignoble savages, teary-eyed environmentalists or, most recently, simply as casino-rich, native peoples find their efforts to be treated with a measure of respect and integrity undermined by images that flatten complex tribal, historical and personal experience into one-dimensional representations that tells us more about the depicters than about the depicted."
Origin and meaning of redskinEdit
The historical context for the emergence in the Americas of racial identities based upon skin color was the establishment of colonies which developed a plantation economy dependent upon slave labor. Before that, the British identified themselves as Christians rather than white. "At the start of the eighteenth century, Indians and Europeans rarely mentioned the color of each other's skins. By midcentury, remarks about skin color and the categorization of peoples by simple color-coded labels (red, white, black) had become commonplace."
Documents from the colonial period indicate that the use of "red" as an identifier by Native Americans for themselves emerged in the context of Indian-European diplomacy in the southeastern region of North America, before later being adopted by Europeans and becoming a generic label for all Native Americans.:627–8 Linguistic evidence indicates that, while some tribes may have used red to refer to themselves during the Pre-Columbian era based upon their origin stories,:634 the general use of the term was in response to meeting people who called themselves "white" and their slaves "black".:629 The choice of red rather than other colors may have been due to cultural associations, rather than skin color.:632
In the debate over the meaning of the word "redskin", team supporters frequently cite a paper by Ives Goddard, a Smithsonian Institution senior linguist and curator emeritus, who asserts that the term was a direct translation of words used by Native Americans to refer to themselves and was benign in its original meaning. In an interview Goddard admits that it is impossible to verify if the native words were accurately translated. Darren R. Reid, a history lecturer at Coventry University, contends that Native American usage was generally attributed to them by European writers. Reid states that the team logo works together with the name to reinforce an unrealistic stereotype: "It is not up to non-Indians to define an idealized image of what it is to a Native American." The "positive" stereotypes allow fans and supporters to honestly state that they are honoring Native Americans, but this is "...forcing your idea of what it is to honour those people onto them and that, fundamentally, is disrespectful."
Advocates of changing the name emphasize current meanings in dictionaries of American English, which include "usually offensive", "disparaging",[a] "insulting", and "taboo". Such meanings are consistent with the usage found in books in the period between 1875 and 1930, which is after that studied by Goddard. John McWhorter, an associate professor of linguistics at Columbia University, compares "redskin" becoming a slur to other racial terms, such as "Oriental", which acquired implied meanings associated with contempt.
A controversial etymological claim is that the term emerged from the practice of paying a bounty for Indians, and that "redskin" refers to the bloody scalp of Native Americans. Although official documents do not use the word in this way, an historical association between the use of "redskin" and the paying of bounties can be made. In 1863, a Winona, Minnesota, newspaper, the Daily Republican, printed an announcement: "The state reward for dead Indians has been increased to $200 for every red-skin sent to Purgatory. This sum is more than the dead bodies of all the Indians east of the Red River are worth." A news story published by the Atchison Daily Champion in Atchison, Kansas, on October 9, 1885, tells of the settlers "hunt for redskins, with a view of obtaining their scalps" valued at $250. For C. Richard King the lack of direct evidence does not mean that contemporary Native people are wrong to draw an association between a term that empathizes an identity based upon skin color and a history that commodified Native American body parts.
The meaning of the term "redskin" was addressed in two cases challenging the trademark registrations held by Pro-Football, Inc., the team's corporate entity. The challenge was based upon a provision of the Lanham Act which prohibited the registration of any mark that "may disparage persons, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute." The first case, Harjo etal. v Pro-Football, Inc. was filed in 1992 by Suzan Shown Harjo and six other Native American leaders. In 1999 the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) canceled the federal registrations for the Redskins marks. In 2005 the United States District Court for the District of Columbia reversed the TTAB's decision on the grounds of insufficient evidence of disparagement. Subsequent appeals were also rejected on the basis of laches, that the Native American petitioners had pursued their rights in an untimely manner.
A second case was filed with younger plaintiffs not effected by laches, led by Amanda Blackhorse. The linguistic expert for the petitioners, Geoffrey Nunberg, successfully argued that whatever its origins, "redskins" was a slur at the time of the trademark registrations, based upon the passages from books and newspapers and the movie clips in which the word is inevitably associated with contempt, derision, condescension, or sentimental paeans to the noble savage. "Nigger" also began as a benign reference to skin color, only to become a racial slur through disparaging use. On June 18, 2014, the TTAB again voted to cancel the trademarks in a two to one decision that held that the term "redskins" is disparaging to a "substantial composite of Native Americans."  Evidence of disparagement include the frequent references to "scalping" made by sportswriters for sixty years when reporting the Redskins loss of a game, and passages from movies made from the 1940s to the 1960s using "redskin" to refer to Native Americans as a savage enemy. The TTAB majority held that the NCAI represented about 30 percent of Native Americans during the time in question, which the Board found satisfied the substantial composite test of the trademark law.
In December 2015, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the disparagement prohibition in the trademark law in a case (Matal v. Tam) involving a denial of trademark registration to the Asian-American band The Slants. The majority opinion stated, in part, that "[w]hatever our personal feelings about the mark at issue here, or other disparaging marks, the First Amendment forbids government regulators to deny registration because they find speech likely to offend others." On June 19, 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of Tam, stating "The disparagement clause violates the First Amendment's Free Speech Clause. Contrary to the Government's contention, trademarks are private, not government speech." On June 29, 2017, both the Native American petitioners and the Justice Department withdrew from any further litigation now that the Supreme Court has rendered the legal issue moot. While team owner Daniel Snyder expresses the opinion that the court decision is a victory for the team, the Executive Director of the NCAI asserts that the name remains a slur, and the decision that grants it First Amendment protection does not alter any of the arguments against its continued use.
Use by Native AmericansEdit
Supporters of the Redskins name note that three predominantly Native American high schools use the name for their sports teams, suggesting that it can be acceptable. However, in 2013 the principal of one of these, Red Mesa High School in Teec Nos Pos, Arizona, said that use of the word outside American Indian communities should be avoided because it could perpetuate "the legacy of negativity that the term has created". Teec Nos Pos, in the Navajo Nation, is 96.5% Native American. Wellpinit, Washington, a town within a reservation of the Spokane people, is 79.3% Native American. In 2014, Wellpinit High School voted to keep the Redskins name. The third school, Kingston High School in Kingston, Oklahoma is 57.69% Native American.
Native American writer and attorney Gyasi Ross compares Native American use of variations of the word "redskin" with African-American use of variations of the word "nigger"; specifically Natives calling each other "skins" as analogous to "nigga". The use of terms by some members of minority communities does not mean that the same may be used by outsiders; this is generally recognized by white people with regard to black expressions, yet whites feel free to say how Natives should feel about "redskin". Ross also notes that there is no consensus among Natives regarding either opposition to the Washington team's use of the name, or the importance of the issue compared to more immediate concerns. However, in response to the argument that Native Americans ought to focus on social issues larger than a team name, Ross stated that "Native people shouldn't be forced to choose between living or racial discrimination. Those are false binaries."
The Redskins controversy began receiving more attention in 2013, starting with a symposium in February on the topic at the Smithsonian's National Museum of the American Indian in Washington, D.C. Subsequently, the Oneida Indian Nation of New York sponsored a series of radio ads in each city to coincide with games of the 2013 season, each featuring a targeted message. A broader range of persons spoke in favor of change or open discussion, including local government leaders, members of Congress, and President Barack Obama. Statements in support of a name change by academic, civil rights and religious organizations were added to those that Native American groups have been making for decades.
In 2017, when professional sports has dealt with a number of racial issues, from individual acts by players to widespread protests during the National Anthem, some commentators speculate why there has been no action to address the stereotyping of Native Americans, including the decision to have the Washington Redskins host a game on Thanksgiving.
The issue is often discussed in the media in terms of offensiveness or political correctness, which reduces it to feelings and opinions, and prevents full understanding of the historical, psychological and sociological context provided by academic research on the negative effects of the use of Native American names and images by sports teams. The effect of stereotyping on high or low expectations, confidence, and academic performance has been well-established. This effect is enhanced due to the invisibility of Native Americans in mainstream society and media, leaving stereotypes as the primary basis for thinking about the abilities and traits associated with Natives, including the roles and opportunities Natives Americans envision for themselves. Furthermore, even when stereotypes are positive (e.g. "Natives Americans are spiritual"), they may have a limiting, detrimental effect on individuals. Stereotyping may directly affect the academic performance and self-esteem of Native American youth, whose people face high rates of suicide, unemployment, and poverty. Euro-Americans exposed to mascots may be more likely to believe not only that such stereotypes are true, but that Native Americans have no identity beyond these stereotypes. Research indicates that exposure to any stereotypes increased the likelihood of stereotypical thinking with regard to other minority groups in addition to the target of the stereotype, a "spreading effect".
Native Americans opposed to mascots point to the oversimplification of their culture by fans "playing Indian" with no understanding of the deeper meaning of feathers, face paint, chants, and dancing. Richard Lapchick, director emeritus of Northeastern University's Center for the Study of Sport in Society, wrote: "Could you imagine people mocking African Americans in black face at a game? Yet go to a game where there is a team with an Indian name and you will see fans with war paint on their faces. Is this not the equivalent to black face?"  The unofficial mascot of the Redskins team was Zema Williams (aka Chief Zee), an African American man who attended games for 38 years beginning in 1978 dressed in a red faux "Indian" costume, complete with feathered war bonnet and rubber tomahawk. Other fans dress in similar costumes for games.
In a report published by the Center for American Progress summarizing the research on "The Real Impact of Native Mascots and Team Names on American Indian and Alaska Native Youth", a case is made that the public debate misses the point, since individual opinions on either side do not matter given the measurable effects on the mental health of Native American young people exposed to such misrepresentations of their ethnic identity, and the often hostile or insulting behavior of non-natives that occur when teams with such names and mascots play. Clinical Psychologist Michael Friedman writes that the use of Native imagery, in particular the use of a dictionary defined slur, is a form of bullying, the negative impact of which is magnified by its being officially sanctioned.
The majority of scholars argue that the use of any stereotype, whether positive or negative, is a hindrance to the advancement of the targeted group. The national organizations representing several academic disciplines, after reviewing the research done on the issue, have passed resolutions calling for the end of all Native American mascots and images in sports. These include the Society of Indian Psychologists (1999), the American Counseling Association (2001), the American Psychological Association (2005), the American Sociological Association (2007). and the American Anthropological Association (2015). The executive board of the nation's leading organization of scholars of U.S. history approved a resolution in April 2015: "The Organization of American Historians hereby adds its voice to the growing demands by Native American organizations, our sister disciplines, and conscientious people of all ethnic backgrounds, to change the name and logo of the Washington 'Redskins'."
Native American advocates of changeEdit
In the 1940s the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) created a campaign to eliminate negative stereotyping of Native American people in the media. Over time, the campaign began to focus on Indian names and mascots in sports. The NCAI maintains that teams with mascots such as the Braves and the Redskins perpetuate negative stereotypes of Native American people, and demean their native traditions and rituals. The NCAI issued a new report in 2013 summarizing opposition to Indian mascots and team names generally, and the Washington Redskins in particular. In the trademark case, the TTAB placed significance on the NCAI opposition, estimating that the organization represented about 30% of the Native American population at the time the trademarks were granted, which met their criteria for a "substantial composite" of Native Americans finding the name disparaging. In its amicus brief filed in the case, the NCAI states that the combined enrollment of its member tribes in 2013 was 1.2 million individuals.
Many tribal councils have passed resolutions or issued statements regarding their opposition to the name of the Washington Redskins, including the Cherokee and Comanche Nations of Oklahoma, the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, the Inter-Tribal Council of the Five Civilized Tribes, the Oneida Indian Nation (New York), the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe (North Dakota) and the United South and Eastern Tribes (USET). In April 2014, Navajo Nation Council voted in favor of a statement opposing the name of the Washington team, as well as other disparaging references to American Indians by other professional sports franchises. Other Native American groups advocating change include: the Native American Bar Association of DC, the National Caucus of Native American State Legislators, and the Society of American Indian Government Employees.
Individual Native Americans who are or have been actively opposed to the Redskins' name include:
- Author Sherman Alexie (Spokane)
- Co-founder of the American Indian Movement Clyde Bellecourt (Ojibwe)
- Former U.S. Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell (Northern Cheyenne)
- Historian and author Vine Deloria, Jr. (Sioux)
- Director of National Museum of the American Indian Kevin Gover (Pawnee)
- Author and recent Presidential Medal of Freedom recipient Suzan Shown Harjo (Cheyenne/Hodulgee Muscogee)
- Activist/actor Russell Means (Oglala Lakota)
Civil rights and religious organizationsEdit
At its 2013 annual conference, the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights (LCCHR), which includes the NAACP and the ACLU as members, passed a unanimous resolution of the 85 representatives present that, while recognizing that a business has the First Amendment right to use any name that it chooses, others need not be complicit in the use of a pejorative and insulting name; and calling upon all Federal, state and local government entities "to end any preferential tax, zoning, or policy treatment that could be viewed as supporting the franchise as long as it retains its current team name". The resolution also commended the "current and former government officials, media outlets, and other entities that have encouraged the Washington Redskins franchise to change its team name or that have refused to be complicit in promoting the current team name". In response, the team released a brief statement reiterating their previous position, and quoting two individuals as being both Native American and Redskins fans who do not want the name to change. The LCCHR also issued a press release in 2014 applauding the decision to cancel the trademark protection for the team's name. The NAACP issued their own press release supporting the TTAB decision stating "The NAACP has called specifically for this name change since 1992, and will continue to stand with the Native Indian community until the derogatory moniker has been changed."
The Fritz Pollard Alliance, a non-profit organization closely allied with the NFL on civil rights issues, announced its support of a name change in 2015 after repeated attempts to discuss the issue with the team owner and representatives. An attorney for the Alliance, N. Jeremi Duru, an American University law professor, made a study of the controversy in which he concluded that Native Americans are justified in finding the name offensive.
In 1992, the Central Conference of American Rabbis issued a resolution calling for the end of sports teams names that promote racism, in particular the Atlanta Braves and the Washington Redskins. The Anti-Defamation League was one of the organizations signing a letter to broadcasters urging them to avoid using the name. The Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism also advocates a name change.
In 2013 a group of 61 religious leaders in Washington, D.C., sent a letter to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and team owner Dan Snyder stating their moral obligation to join the Change the Mascot movement due to the offensive and inappropriate nature of the name which causes pain whether or not that is intended.
In June 2016; Sidwell Friends School, affiliated with the Quakers, amended its dress code to ban apparel with the Redskins name or logo as "offensive and antithetical to the values of the community". In August 2017; another private school in Montgomery County, Maryland, adopted a similar policy.
In 2018 a Native American employee filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Energy claiming that the agency racially discriminated against her by allowing other employees to discuss the Washington Redskins football team and display Redskins paraphernalia at work. She also alleges that the Department of Energy retaliated against her after she raised concerns about the Redskins following in the office. The United States District Court, District of Columbia dismissed the discrimination claim on the basis that the derogatory nature of the team name is in dispute, and that the law does not require employers to take sides in that dispute. In addition, while accepting that the name is hurtful to the employee, discussion of a local football team by co-workers is not equivalent to the use of a hurtful term directed toward an individual. However, the court did not dismiss the claim that the agency retaliated against the employee for bringing up the issue.
Although often assumed to be a debate of recent origins, local Washington, D.C. newspapers have published news items on the controversy many times since at least 1971, all in response to Native American individuals or organizations asking for the name to be changed. National protests began in 1988, after the team's Super Bowl XXII victory, prompting numerous Native Americans to write letters to Redskins owner Jack Kent Cooke; others boycotted Redskins products and protested, but Cooke rejected the possibility of change. There was a protest of about 2,000 people at the 1992 Super Bowl between the Redskins and the Buffalo Bills; the American Indian Movement's (AIM) Vernon Bellecourt was one of the main organizers of the protest.
Since 2013, picketing at stadiums has occurred occasionally when the Redskins have played, particularly in cities with a significant population of Native Americans, such as Dallas, Denver and Minneapolis. The latter protest was supported by several Minnesota politicians. Picketing resumed for the 2014 season in Glendale, Arizona, when the team played the Arizona Cardinals, and again the largest rally was in Minneapolis, where estimates of the number of protestors was between 3,500 and 5,000. At a protest in Philadelphia in 2017, Native Americans pointed out the irony of NFL players making a statement opposing racial injustice by "taking a knee" for the National Anthem while one of the teams taking the field continues to use a racially offensive name and logo.
FedEx owns the naming rights to the team's stadium, FedExField, through 2026, and has been the only corporate sponsor officially subject to boycotts by Native Americans: the Osage Nation, the Native American Rights Fund (NARF), and the Central Council of Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes, the largest tribe of Native Alaskan peoples.
On December 13, 2017 a Native American group, Rising Hearts, created a Twitter campaign and several parody web sites including one for the team that made it appear that the Redskins had agreed to change its name to the Washington Redhawks for the 2018 season. The organizers state that their intention is to stimulate debate that will eventually lead to an actual name change. At a news conference the following day they stated that their effort was culture jamming, and were surprised that the Redskins issued a statement denying any plans to change, as if it were serious, or "fake news".
Responses to the controversyEdit
Following the February 2013 symposium "Racist Stereotypes and Cultural Appropriation in American Sports" at the Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian, 10 members of Congress sent a letter to the Redskins' owner and the NFL Commissioner requesting that the name be changed since it is offensive to Native Americans. In response, Daniel Snyder told USA Today: "We'll never change the name. ... It's that simple. NEVER—you can use caps." Snyder addressed an open letter to fans that was published in The Washington Post on October 9, 2013; in which he stated that the most important meaning of the name is the association that fans have to memories of their personal history with the team. Snyder also states that the name was chosen in 1933 to honor Native Americans in general and the coach and four players at that time who were Native American; and that in 1971 coach George Allen consulted with the Red Cloud Indian Fund on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation when designing the logo. In 2013, the Red Cloud Athletic Fund sent a letter to the Washington Post stating that "As an organization, Red Cloud Indian School has never—and will never—endorse the use of the name 'Redskins'. Like many Native American organizations across the country, members of our staff and extended community find the name offensive."
Snyder's response, and that of other supporters and fans, reflects the psychology of identification with sports teams. Self-esteem becomes bound to the players and the team, with many beneficial but also some unfortunate consequences, including denial or rationalization of misbehavior.
In June 2013, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell defended the name by citing its origins, traditions and polls that support its popularity. In February 2018, following the announcement by MLB Commissioner Robert Manfred that the Cleveland Indians would remove their Chief Wahoo logo from the stadium and uniforms, Goodell stated that the Redskins name and logo would remain, primarily citing the 2016 Washington Post opinion poll.
On their website the team states that the 2014 annual NFL poll showing 71 percent support for the name, "along with the poll taken among Native Americans by the Annenberg Institute, demonstrates continued, widespread and deep opposition to the Redskins changing our name... We respect the point of view of the small number of people who seek a name change, but it is important to recognize very few people agree with the case they are making."
The team's president, Bruce Allen, addressed a letter dated May 23, 2014, to Senator Reid repeating the position that the name was originated by Native Americans to refer to themselves, that the logo was also designed and approved by Native American leaders, and that the vast majority of both Native Americans and the public do not find the name offensive.
Conservative columnists George Will and Pat Buchanan state that opponents of the team name are being oversensitive, although Charles Krauthammer drew a parallel between the evolution of "Negro" and "Redskin" from being in common use to being condescending and insulting. W. James Antle III, Rich Lowry, and Dennis Prager wrote that outrage over mascots is manufactured by white liberals, rather than being the authentic voice of Native Americans.
Individual Native American opinion in support of Redskins nameEdit
In May 2013, the Redskins' website reported the opinions of a local fan, Stephen D. Dodson, who claimed to be a chief and "full-blooded American Inuit originally from the Aleutian Tribes of Alaska". He said that not only was "Redskins" not offensive to him and his "whole family", but it was a "term of endearment" that Indians "on the reservation ... would call each other". Roger Goodell wrote a letter to Congress that in part pointed to "recent remarks from Chief Steven Dodson, an American Inuit chief" to indicate support for the nickname among Native Americans. Soon it was reported that the Dodson was neither a full-blooded Inuit nor a "Chief" and that court records linked him to instances of "theft, paternity, and domestic violence matters." The executive director of the Inuit Circumpolar Council-Alaska, said that neither "Chief" nor "Indian" are terms used by Alaska's native peoples.
Also in 2013, a brother and sister in Oneida, New York, stated that they were Native American (Mohawk) and ardent Redskins fans. Three Virginia Indian leaders said in 2013 that they are not offended by the name Redskins but are more concerned about other issues such as the lack of Federal recognition for any Virginia tribe.[b] Robert "Two Eagles" Green, retired chief of the Fredericksburg area Patawomeck Tribe, stated on a radio talk show he would be offended if the team changed its name. In an article in The American Spectator, the current chief of the Patawomeck Tribe, John Lightner, said that while he was not offended by the current name, he would support changing the team to the Washington Potomacs.
On November 25, 2013, as part of the NFL's "Salute to Service" month and Native American Heritage month, the Washington Redskins recognized four members of the Navajo Code Talkers Association briefly during a commercial break. One of them, Roy Hawthorne, has stated, "My opinion is that's a name that not only the team should keep, but that's a name that's American." This action was criticized by Amanda Blackhorse, also Navajo, and described as a publicity stunt. In April 2014, Navajo Nation Council voted in favor of a statement opposing the name of the Washington team, as well as other disparaging references to American Indians by other professional sports franchises. Later that year, members of the Navajo and Zuni Tribes and students from the Red Mesa Redskins High School attended a Redskins vs. Cardinals game as guests of the Washington team.
In 2014 the Redskins released a two-minute video on YouTube entitled "Redskins is a Powerful Name" in which several Native Americans express their support for the team. Of the fourteen individuals, five are members of the Chippewa Cree tribe on the Rocky Boy Indian Reservation in Montana and are associated with the Team Redskins Rodeo club. Two are Mike Wetzel and Don Wetzel, Jr. (Blackfeet), descendants of the logo designer, and the six others are members of various tribes and state that they are fans of the team and find nothing wrong with the name, or think it is positive. One of the individuals in the video is Mark One Wolf, who was reported as being born Mark E. Yancey in Washington, D.C., of African-American and Japanese descent.
Although the majority of those advocating a name change are Democrats, there is no indication that the issue is of any real significance in electoral decisions given that Native Americans are such a small percentage of the electorate and are not likely to influence the outcome of any election. There are only eight states where Natives make up greater than 2 percent of the population: Alaska, Arizona, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Wyoming. However, polls show a definite political difference in the opinion of the general public, with only 58% of Democrats opposing a name change versus 89% of Republicans. Statements by political figures have generally been expressions of personal opinion rather than recommendations for government action. There have also been non-binding resolutions advocating name change proposed in New Jersey and passed in Minneapolis, New York State and California.
The topic came up in a 2013 interview of President Barack Obama, who stated that if he were the owner of the Redskins, he would consider changing the name because it offends many Native Americans, but that he did not have a stake in the issue as he is not an owner of a professional sports team. In November 2015 Obama, speaking at the White House Tribal Nations Conference, stated "Names and mascots of sports teams like the Washington Redskins perpetuate negative stereotypes of Native Americans" and praised Adidas for a new initiative to help schools change names and mascots by designing new logos and paying for part of the cost of new uniforms. On May 22, 2014, fifty U.S. Senators, forty-eight Democrats and two Independents, sent a letter to NFL Commissioner Goodell asking the league, referencing the Donald Sterling case, to "send the same clear message as the NBA did: that racism and bigotry have no place in professional sports." Five Democratic Senators declined to sign the letter, and Republicans were not invited to do so. No Senators have publicly supported the name, but rather have either declined to give an opinion or stated their opposition to Senate involvement in the issue. During his campaign, President Donald Trump defended the name.
DC Metro area jurisdictionsEdit
Much of the local political discussion has been about building a stadium, beginning in the 1990s when a Maryland location was chosen for what is now FedExField. With the possibility of building a new stadium in the near future, both the previous and current mayors of the District of Columbia have stated that a name change must be part of the discussion, however the team rejects that possibiltiy. Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe has met with the owner to discuss the building of a new stadium in Virginia. For many years, beginning with the departure of the Baltimore Colts, the Redskins were the only NFL team in a large area from Maryland into the southern states. This is slowly changing as Maryland NFL fans move to the Baltimore Ravens. Several Maryland politicians have stated that the name should change, but governor Larry Hogan opposes any change, also citing the desire to keep the stadium in Maryland. Virginia fans are now the more numerous and dedicated supporters of the Redskins, and the state and local governments have used economic incentives to encourage the team's relocation of its facilities there, and maintain that the name is entirely a business decision for the team to make. An agency of the commonwealth, the Virginia Lottery, is a sponsor of the team, and says it has never had any complaints.
Name change as a business decisionEdit
Two professors at the Goizueta Business School at Emory University summarized their research in a New York Times editorial. They found that studies of college teams that have changed their names and mascots indicate that doing so has a long-term financial benefit. While vocal opponents of change often threatened withdrawal of support, this never materialized. There have been no name changes by professional teams, though a comparison of NFL teams shows the highest negative trend in brand equity affects the Washington Redskins and the Kansas City Chiefs, calling into question the business logic of retaining Native American names or logos that are offensive to even a minority. In a commentary for Forbes, Tom Van Riper states that research specifically considering the fan loyalty and traditions of the team indicates that the value of the name as a brand is significant, and unlikely to change for business reasons. An alternative opinion is that the team would benefit from a re-branding, but any new name would need to be carefully selected. In 2014 sales of Redskins merchandise declined 35% from the previous year. "People are having a second thoughts about wearing a T-shirt with the logo or name that it has now been called racist," said Matt Powell, senior analyst for SportsSourceOne. A team spokesman attributed the decline to dismal performance in the 2013 season, but other teams with bad records have not seen such a steep decline in sales. Corporate sponsors have either made no public response to media inquiries regarding the name or stated that they play no role in the decision, and defer to the team and the NFL. Despite the name controversy, the value of the team has risen $700 million to $2.4 billion (40%), making them the third most valuable franchise in the NFL, based upon the valuations published by Forbes magazine in 2014 and 2015.
Other teams that use the name RedskinsEdit
The number of high schools using the Redskins name has been in steady decline, 40% having had local efforts to change the name. Between 1988 and April 2013, 28 high schools in 18 states had done so. By December 2017, the number of high school "Redskins" had continued to decline from 62 to 49, including four affected by a 2015 California law. College teams that had been Redskins changed their names voluntarily decades ago, the University of Utah became the Utah Utes in 1972, Miami University became the RedHawks in 1997, and the Southern Nazarene University became the Crimson Storm in 1998.
Public opinion pollsEdit
While varying somewhat, national opinion polls consistently indicate that a majority of the general public do not advocate a name change: 79 percent (April 2013), 60 percent (June 2014), and 71 percent (September 2014).  While yielding overall results similar to national polls, with a majority supporting the team keeping the name, local surveys often ask additional questions. In three polls, although they supported the team name, 59 percent, 56 percent, and 53 percent of DC, Maryland, and Virginia fans also said that the word "redskin" is offensive to Native Americans in at least some contexts. The September 2014 national poll found that 68 percent think the name is not disrespectful of Native Americans, 19 percent say it shows "some" disrespect, and 9 percent say it is "a lot" disrespectful. The 2016 annual NFL poll found significant difference of opinion based upon age and race. Older respondents are opposed to a name change, but those between 18 and 29 are strongly (70%) in favor of a change. While 77% of all white fans believe the name should not be changed, only 38% of African-American and 33% of Latino fans agree, which is a change since the 2014 poll in which there was little difference between white and non-white opinion.
Louis Gray, president of the Tulsa Indian Coalition Against Racism and an Osage Indian said, "You wouldn't [take a poll] with any other race. You wouldn't have African-Americans vote to decide whether or not any sort of racial epithet would be offensive."
The survey most frequently cited by opponents of change as definitive of Native American opinion was performed in 2004 as part of the National Annenberg Election Survey. Among other questions regarding election year issues, respondents who identified themselves as being Native American were asked: "The professional football team in Washington calls itself the Washington Redskins. As a Native American, do you find that name offensive or doesn't it bother you?" In response, ninety percent replied that the name did not bother them, while nine percent said that it was offensive, and one percent would not answer. The methods used in this survey and the conclusions that can be drawn from it have been criticized by social scientists, Native American scholars and legal experts for years. In August 2015, a memo written by senior researchers at the organization responsible for collecting the data for the survey which made it clear that it should not be taken as an accurate reflection of Native American attitudes at the time.
In May 2016, The Washington Post released a poll of self-identified Native Americans that produced the same results as the 2004 Annenberg poll, that 90% of the 504 respondents were "not bothered" by the team's name. NCAI Executive Director Jacqueline Pata stated "The survey doesn't recognize the psychological impacts these racist names and imagery have on American Indian and Alaska Natives. It is not respectful to who we are as Native people. This poll still doesn't make it right." The Native American Journalists Association issued a statement calling the publication of the poll, and the reporting of its significance, as not only inaccurate and misleading but unethical. "The reporters and editors behind this story must have known that it would be used as justification for the continued use of these harmful, racist mascots. They were either willfully malicious or dangerously naïve in the process and reporting used in this story, and neither is acceptable from any journalistic institution."
An alternative method to standard opinion polls was used by the Center for Indigenous Peoples Studies at California State University, San Bernardino. A survey was conducted of 400 individuals, with 98 individuals positively identified as Native Americans. Surveyors verified Native American status of respondents claiming Native affiliation. Most Native American survey respondents were collected at pow-wows, a form of non-probabilistic convenience sampling. 67% of the Native Americans (n=66) polled agreed with the statement that "Redskins" is racial or racist. The response from non-natives was almost the opposite, with 68% responding that the name is not offensive.
- Originally a translation of 18th-century Mississippi Valley French Peau Rouge, Native American person (peau, skin + rouge, red), a translation of non-deprecatory Native American self-designations such as Fox meeshkwinameshkaata, literally, "one having red skin" : meshkw-, red + -i-nameshk-, skin + -aa-, to have + -ta, participle suffix (used in opposition to designations of persons of European origin as waapeshkinameshkaata, "one having white skin" : waapeshk-, white + -i-nameshk-, skin + -aa-, to have + -ta, participle suffix).
- In 2016, Federal recognition was granted to the Pamunkey Tribe of Virginia.
- John Woodrow Cox. "In Minnesota, thousands of Native Americans protest Redskins' name". The Washington Post. Retrieved May 1, 2016.
- Ending the Legacy of Racism in Sports & the Era of Harmful "Indian" Sports Mascots (PDF) (Report). National Congress of American Indians. October 2013. Retrieved November 13, 2017.
- "Legislative efforts to eliminate native-themed mascots, nicknames, and logos: Slow but steady progress post-APA resolution". American Psychological Association. August 2010. Retrieved January 23, 2013.
- "Leading National Civil Rights and Racial Justice Organizations Announce Joint Opposition to Washington NFL Team Locating New Stadium in District of Columbia". NAACP. August 24, 2018.
- Theresa Vargas (June 18, 2014). "U.S. patent office cancels Redskins trademark registration, says name is disparaging". Washington Post. Retrieved June 18, 2014.
- Erik Brady (June 18, 2014). "Redskins trademarks canceled by U.S. Patent Office". USA TODAY Sports. Retrieved November 13, 2017.
- "Memorandum Opinion and Order, Pro-Football, Inc. v. Blackhorse, et al" (pdf). Retrieved July 8, 2015.
- Bruce Allen (May 23, 2014). "The Truth about the Redskins Name and Logo" (PDF). Redskins.com. Retrieved July 16, 2014.
- Soong, Kelyn (April 2, 2013). "The Other Redskins". Philip Merrill College of Journalism. Capitol News Service. Retrieved December 20, 2017.
- Kathleen Hall Jamieson (September 24, 2004). "Most Indians Say Name of Washington "Redskins" Is Acceptable While 9 Percent Call It Offensive". The Annenberg Public Policy Center. Archived from the original on October 14, 2013. Retrieved September 27, 2014.
- D. Anthony Tyeeme Clark (2005). "Indigenous Voice and Vision as Commodity in a Mass-Consumption Society: The Colonial Politics of Public Opinion Polling". American Indian Quarterly. University of Nebraska Press. 29 (1/2 (Winter – Spring): 228–238. doi:10.1353/aiq.2005.0039. JSTOR 4138809.
- John Woodrow Cox; Scott Clement; Theresa Vargas (May 19, 2016). "New poll finds 9 in 10 Native Americans aren't offended by Redskins name". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 13, 2017.
- John Banzhaf (May 29, 2014). "Defense of "Redskins" Name Shattered - Pressure to Now Change "Racist" Name Grows". prlog.org. Retrieved November 13, 2017.
- Robert McCartney (May 28, 2014). "1933 news article refutes cherished tale that Redskins were named to honor Indian coach". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 13, 2017.
- Tom Pollin (June 6, 2013). "Dropping Back In NFL History: Lone Star And The Redskins". Football Nation. Archived from the original on January 16, 2014. Retrieved January 13, 2014.
- "Boston Redskins (1932-1936)". sportsecyclopedia.com. Sports Encyclopedia. Retrieved November 13, 2017.
- Scott Mansch (February 19, 2014). "Don Wetzel: Don't call Redskins logo offensive". Great Falls Tribune. Great Falls, Montana. Retrieved September 27, 2014.
- David Murray (November 18, 2014). "Is 'Redskins' a racial slur? Blackfeet weigh in". Great Falls Tribune. Retrieved November 14, 2017.
- "APA Resolution Justifications" (PDF). apa.org. American Psychological Association. 2005. Retrieved January 21, 2013.
- Carter Meland; David E. Wilkins (November 22, 2012). "Stereotypes in sports, chaos in federal policy". The Star Tribune. Retrieved January 30, 2013.(Carter Meland (Anishinaabe) and David E. Wilkins (Lumbee) are professors of Native American Studies at the University of Minnesota.)
- Shoemaker, Nancy (2004). "Race". A Strange Likeness: Becoming Red and White in Eighteenth-Century North America. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 129. ISBN 9780195167924.
- Shoemaker, Nancy (1997). "How Indians Got to Be Red" (pdf). The American Historical Review. 102 (3): 625–644. doi:10.2307/2171504. JSTOR 2171504. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- Goddard, Ives (2005). "'I AM A RED-SKIN':The Adoption of a Native American Expression (1769–1826)" (PDF). European Review of Native American Studies. 19 (2). Retrieved November 14, 2017.
- Guy Gugliotta (October 3, 2005). "A Linguist's Alternative History of 'Redskin'". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 21, 2011.
- Darren R. Reid. "Why the 'Redskins' is a Racist Name". Retrieved November 17, 2017.
- Darren R. Reid (August 28, 2014). "The Artist in American History: 11-Why the 'Redskins' is a Racist Name". iTunes.com (Podcast). Retrieved December 17, 2017.
- "Definition of REDSKIN". Merriam-Webster. Retrieved November 14, 2017.
- The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. 2011. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- "Redskin". Dictionary.com. Retrieved November 14, 2017.
- "K Dictionaries Online". Random House Kernerman Webster's College Dictionary. Archived from the original on October 6, 2014. Retrieved November 14, 2017.
- "Definition of redskin". Collins English Dictionary. Retrieved November 14, 2017.
- Bruce Stapleton (2001). Redskins: Racial Slur or Symbol of Success?. iUniverse. p. 83. ISBN 0-595-17167-2. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- John McWhorter (October 12, 2015). "Why 'Redskins' Is a Bad Word". Time. Time Inc. Retrieved November 15, 2017.
- Sudip Bhattacharya (May 7, 2014). "'Redskin': A fun team name or racial epithet?". LancasterOnline. Steinman Communications. Retrieved November 14, 2017.
Michael Taylor, a Seneca Indian and an assistant professor at Colgate University: The term "redskin" comes from the Colonial era, when some Native Americans were killed in clashes with newly arrived settlers and others were hunted down for a bounty.
- "Winona Newspaper Database". The Daily Republican. September 25, 1863. Retrieved November 15, 2017.
- Simon Moya-Smith (January 26, 2015). "Seeking $250 Reward, Settlers Hunted For 'Redskin Scalps' During Extermination Effort". Indian Country Today. Retrieved November 15, 2017.
- King, C. Richard (2016). "Origins". Redskins: Insult and Brand. University of Nebraska Press. p. 16. ISBN 978-0-8032-7864-6. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- Seamon, Davin L (July 8, 2014). "Trademark Sensitivity: Learning from the Washington Redskins". The National Law Review. Steptoe & Johnson PLLC. Retrieved November 15, 2017.
- "USPTO TTABVUE. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Inquiry System". United States Patent and Trademark Office. Retrieved November 15, 2017.
- Erik Brady (May 9, 2013). "New generation of Native Americans challenges Redskins". USA Today. Retrieved May 10, 2013.
- Geoffrey Nunberg (June 23, 2014). "When Slang Becomes a Slur". The Atlantic Monthly. Retrieved November 17, 2017.
- Ken Belson; Edward Wyatt (June 18, 2014). "U.S. Patent Office Cancels Redskins Trademark Registration". The New York Times. Retrieved November 15, 2017.
- Lindsey Adler (June 18, 2014). "60 Years Of Shocking Redskins Headlines:A sampling of violent wordplay". BuzzFeed. Retrieved November 15, 2017.
- Dan Steinberg (June 18, 2014). "Here are some of the movie clips cited in the Redskins trademark case". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 17, 2017.
- Ryan Van Bibber (June 19, 2014). "12 questions (and answers) that explain the 'Redskins' trademark case". SBNation. Retrieved November 15, 2017.
- Danielle Gorman (August 1, 2014). "UNITED STATES: In a Split Decision, the TTAB Affirms Cancellation of REDSKINS Trademarks". INTA Journal. 69 (14). International Trademark Association. Retrieved November 15, 2017.
- Joe Mullin (December 23, 2015). "Asian-American band "The Slants" overturns USPTO rule on "disparaging" trademarks". Ars Technica. Retrieved December 24, 2015.
- Eyder Peralta (December 22, 2015). "Government Can't Deny Trademarks Over Offensive Names, Appeals Court Rules". NPR.org. Retrieved December 23, 2015.
- "15-1293 Martal V. Tam" (PDF). SupremeCourt.gov. June 29, 2017. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
- Ian Shapira; Ann E. Marimow (June 29, 2017). "Washington Redskins win trademark fight over the team's name". The Washington Post. Retrieved June 30, 2017.
- Jacqueline Pata; Ray Halbritter (July 26, 2017). "The NFL Needs to Stop Promoting a Racial Slur". Time. Time, Inc. Retrieved July 27, 2017.
- Rick Reilly (September 18, 2013). "Have the people spoken?". ESPN. Archived from the original on September 19, 2013. Retrieved October 15, 2013.
- Michelle Peirano (May 1, 2013). "In debate over Redskins name, is the 'R-word' for racism or respect?". Cronkite News. Retrieved February 6, 2014.
- Spokane Tribe of Indians (2013). "Spokane Tribe of Indians: A Socioeconomic Profile 2013" (PDF). Retrieved November 17, 2017.
- KXLY Staff (June 20, 2014). "School board votes to keep name Wellpinit Redskins". KXLY.com. Retrieved November 15, 2017.
- Gyasi Ross (October 16, 2013). ""Redskins": A Native's Guide To Debating An Inglorious Word". Deadspin. Retrieved November 10, 2014.
- Gyasi Ross (October 30, 2013). "The False Binary of the 'Redskins' Controversy". huffingtonpost.com. The Huffington Post. Retrieved November 15, 2017.
- "Racist Stereotypes and Cultural Appropriations in Sports" (PDF). National Museum of the American Indian. February 7, 2013. Retrieved November 3, 2017.
- Erik Brady (September 5, 2013). "Indian tribe launches radio ads against Redskins' name". USA TODAY Sports. Retrieved November 15, 2017.
- Theresa Vargas (December 5, 2013). "Faith leaders urge Redskins owner Dan Snyder and NFL to change team's name". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- Zirin, Dave (November 17, 2017). "By Having the Washington R*dskins Host a Game on Thanksgiving, NFL Owners Show Their True Colors". The Nation. ISSN 0027-8378. Retrieved November 24, 2017.
- Howard Bryant (November 23, 2017). "How have we not progressed past these mascots?". ESPN.com. Retrieved November 24, 2017.
- Alan Fisher. "NFL team name causes outrage in the US". Al Jazeera. Retrieved November 24, 2017.
- C. Richard King, ed. (2010). The Native American Mascot Controversy: A Handbook. Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press. pp. xi–xiv. ISBN 978-0-8108-6731-4. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- Annie Murphy Paul (October 6, 2012). "It's Not Me, It's You". The New York Times. Retrieved February 11, 2013.
- Fryberg, Stephanie; Markus, Hazel Rose; Oyserman, Daphna; Stone, Joseph M. (September 2008). "Of Warrior Chiefs and Indian Princesses: The Psychological Consequences of American Indian Mascots" (PDF). Basic and applied social psychology. 30 (3): 208\.
- Chaney, John; Burke, Amanda; Burkley, Edward (January 1, 2011). "Do American Indian Mascots = American Indian People? Examining Implicit Bias towards American Indian People and American Indian Mascots" (pdf). American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research. Centers for American Indian and Alaska Native Health, Colorado School of Public Health. 18 (1): 42. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- Kim-Prieto, Chu (March 2010). "Effect of Exposure to an American Indian Mascot on the Tendency to Stereotype a Different Minority Group". Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 40 (3): 534. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00586.x.
- Shankar Vedantam (March 25, 2010). "Native American imagery as sports mascots: A new problem". Psychology Today. Retrieved February 5, 2013.
- Richard Lapchick (August 25, 2005). "Mascots are a matter of respect". ESPN. Retrieved February 6, 2013.
- Sarah Kogod (December 11, 2012). "Redskins fan gives himself an Indian name, gets DeAngelo Hall's helmet". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 23, 2013.
- Travis Waldron (August 19, 2014). "Washington Fans Wear Headdresses To Game Against Cleveland Browns". ThinkProgress. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- Erik Stegman; Victoria Phillips (July 2014). "Missing the Point: The Real Impact of Native Mascots and Team Names on American Indian and Alaska Native Youth". Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- "Racist names, mascots are harmful to American Indian and Alaska Native youth, says Center for American Progress". ABC7News / WJLATV. July 22, 2014. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- Amanda Terkel (July 22, 2014). "How Washington's Football Team Creates A Hostile Environment For Native American Students". The Huffington Post. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- Michael Friedman, Ph.D. (October 6, 2014). "The NFL is Teaching Us How To Bully Native American Children". Psychology Today. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- Mary Magoulick. "Indian / White Relations II — Persistent Refashioning". Retrieved November 3, 2017.
- "Society of Indian Psychologists" (PDF). January 27, 1999. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 31, 2015. Retrieved August 19, 2013.
- "Opposition to Use of Stereotypical Native American Images as Sports Symbols and Mascots" (PDF). American Counseling Association. 2001. Retrieved January 23, 2013.
- "Summary of the Resolution Recommending Retirement of American Indian Mascots". APA.org. American Psychological Association. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- "Statement by the Council of the American Sociological Association on Discontinuing the Use of Native American Nicknames, Logos and Mascots in Sport". American Sociological Association. March 6, 2007. Retrieved January 23, 2013.
- "AAA Calls on Sports Organizations to Denounce Inappropriate American Indian Mascots" (PDF). American Anthropological Association. March 25, 2015. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 9, 2015. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- James Loewen. "Why Historians Should Demand the Redskins Change Their Name". History News Network. Retrieved May 1, 2015.
- J Gordon Hylton (2010). "Before the Redskins Where the Redskins: The Use of Native American Team Names in the Formative Era of American Sports, 1857–1933" (PDF). 86. North Dakota Law Review: 879. Retrieved November 14, 2017.
- "Anti-Defamation and Mascots". National Congress of American Indians. Retrieved January 12, 2013.
- "NCAI Releases Report on History and Legacy of Washington's Harmful "Indian" Sports Mascot". National Congress of American Indians. Retrieved October 11, 2013.
- Ryan Van Bibber (June 19, 2014). "12 questions (and answers) that explain the 'Redskins' trademark case". SB*Nation. Retrieved November 14, 2017.
- "NCAI Amicus Brief" (PDF). Native American Rights Fund. Retrieved October 24, 2017.
- "Letter to The Honorable Maria Cantwell, Chairwoman of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs" (PDF). Change the Mascot. November 1, 2013. Retrieved November 14, 2017.
- Gene Lehmann. "Leaders of Five Tribes gather at Chickasaw Nation's Artesian Hotel for Intertribal Council". Chickasaw Times. Archived from the original on October 16, 2013. Retrieved October 21, 2013.
- "Resolution Supporting Renaming of the Washington Redskins" (PDF). July 10, 2013. Retrieved November 14, 2017.
- Theresa Vargas; Annys Shin (November 16, 2013). "Oneida Indian Nation is the tiny tribe taking on the NFL and Dan Snyder over Redskins name". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 14, 2017.
- "USET Resolution No. 2014:015 Calling On the National Football League to End the Use of the Washington D.C. Racially Offensive Slur Team Mascot Name" (PDF). October 31, 2013. Retrieved November 14, 2017.
- "Native American Bar Association of Washington, D.C. Resolution # 2015 - 1" (PDF). changethemascot.org. November 17, 2015. Retrieved November 19, 2017.
- "National Caucus of Native American State Legislators" (PDF). changethemascot.org. August 18, 2014. Retrieved November 19, 2017.
- "SAIGE Position on Derogatory Sports Mascots and Team Names" (PDF). saige.org. December 5, 2013. Retrieved November 19, 2017.
- Bill Moyers (April 16, 2013). "Sherman Alexie on Living Outside Cultural Borders". Truthout. Archived from the original on December 27, 2013. Retrieved September 27, 2014.
- Amy Goodman; Juan González (November 8, 2013). "Change the Mascot: Pressure Grows for NFL Team to Drop Redskins Name and Logo as Thousands Protest". Democracy Now!. Archived from the original on November 9, 2013. Retrieved September 27, 2014.
- Ben Nuckols (May 2, 2013). "US poll finds widespread support for Redskins name". AP News. Archived from the original on May 5, 2013. Retrieved September 28, 2014.
- Teresa Wiltz (November 16, 2005). "The Indian Who Overturned the Stereotypes". The Washington Post. Retrieved September 28, 2014.
- Joe Heim (November 23, 2016). "The head of National Museum of the American Indian on what we should all know". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- David Gianatasio (September 11, 2013). "Will Controversial Sports Team Names Be Gone in Five Years? Prominent Native American activist says yes". Adweek. Archived from the original on September 13, 2013. Retrieved September 28, 2014.
- Dirk Lammers (October 22, 2012). "Russell Means, Indian Activist and Fighting Sioux Nickname Critic, Dies at 72". Associated Press. Archived from the original on December 26, 2013. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- Michelle Boorstein (December 12, 2013). "Full text: Resolution on the changing of the Washington Redskins name". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- Theresa Vargas (December 12, 2013). "Civil rights coalition asks Washington Redskins to change name". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- "Washington Redskins Response Statement". December 13, 2013. Archived from the original on November 7, 2017. Retrieved May 31, 2018.
- "Civil and Human Rights Coalition Applauds Patent Office Decision on Washington Football Team Name". The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. June 18, 2014. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- "NAACP Statement on the U.S. Patent and Trade Office Decision to Cancel the Washington Football Team's Trademark". NAACP. June 18, 2014. Archived from the original on July 14, 2014. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- John Woodrow Cox; Mark Maske (January 19, 2015). "Civil rights group closely allied with the NFL calls for the Redskins to change its name". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- "Resolution Adopted by the CCAR: Racism". 1992. Archived from the original on March 19, 2016. Retrieved September 1, 2013.
- "ADL Signs Letter Urging Broadcasters To Avoid Using The Name 'Redskins'". The Jewish Daily Forward. September 5, 2014. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- "U.S. Jewish Reform Groups Call on NFL's Washington Redskins to Change Name". Haaretz Daily Newspaper Ltd. December 16, 2015. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- "Letter to Goodell and Snyder". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- Scott Taylor (June 29, 2015). "Cleveland church calls on Washington Redskins to change name, logo". 19 Action News. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- Chris Lingebach (June 16, 2016). "Sidwell Friends School Bans 'Redskins' Clothing". CBS News. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- Nick Iannelli (August 29, 2017). "Green Acres School in Md. to ban Redskins gear". WTOP. Retrieved August 30, 2017.
- "TALLBEAR v. Perry, Dist. Court, Dist. of Columbia 2018". Retrieved August 1, 2018.
- Dan Steinberg (June 3, 2014). "The Great Redskins Name Debate of ... 1972?". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- Fred Hiatt (September 21, 2014). "Moving beyond the 'imaginary Indians' perception". Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- "Indians Protest". The Pittsburg Press. January 23, 1988. Retrieved October 16, 2013.
- Associated Press (January 27, 1992). "2,000 at Metrodome Protest Indian mascots". The Times-News. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- Todd Unger (October 13, 2013). "Protesters call for Washington NFL team to change its name". WFAA-TV. Archived from the original on October 17, 2013. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- "Battle over controversial Redskins name comes to Dallas". The Dallas Morning News. Associated Press. October 13, 2013. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- Simon Moya-Smith. "'It's always been about the hatred of Indian skin': Native Americans, allies protest Washington Redskins in Denver". NBC News. Archived from the original on January 30, 2014. Retrieved November 2, 2013.
- Will Brinson (October 26, 2013). "Metrodome will use 'Redskins' name in stadium despite protests". CBS News. Retrieved November 2, 2013.
- Mark Maske (November 7, 2013). "Hundreds gather outside Mall of America Field to protest Redskins' name". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 8, 2013.
- Dan Steinberg (November 7, 2013). "Minneapolis mayor condemns Redskins name". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 12, 2013.
- Tad Vezner (November 7, 2013). "Metrodome protesters condemn nickname of Vikings' opponent". TwinCities.com. Archived from the original on November 13, 2013. Retrieved November 12, 2013.
- Associated Press (October 12, 2014). "Protesters of Redskins name rally in Glendale". azfamily.com. KTVK-3TV. Archived from the original on December 13, 2014. Retrieved November 22, 2017.
- Associated Press (November 2, 2014). "Thousands stage Redskins protest". ESPN. Retrieved November 22, 2017.
- John Woodrow Cox (November 2, 2014). "In Minnesota, thousands of Native Americans protest Redskins' name". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 22, 2017.
- Jeff Gammage (October 20, 2017). "At Monday's Eagles game, demanding an end to use of 'Redskins'". The Inquirer. Retrieved November 22, 2017.
- Eliott C. McLaughlin (September 24, 2014). "Tribal chief: No FedEx until Redskins change team name". CNN U.S. Archived from the original on October 3, 2014. Retrieved October 2, 2014.
- "NARF ends FedEx service over FedEx's sponsorship of the Washington NFL football team". June 5, 2015. Retrieved November 22, 2017.
- Melissa Griffiths (June 25, 2015). "Alaska's largest tribe boycotts FedEx". Juneau Empire. Retrieved November 22, 2017.
- "Go Washington Redhawks!". Redhawks. December 13, 2017. Retrieved December 13, 2017.
- Rick Maese (December 13, 2017). "American Indian activists seek to rekindle debate on Redskins nickname". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 13, 2017.
- Travis Waldron (December 13, 2017). "Native American Activists Create Spoof Website To Call For Redskins Name Change". The Huffington Post. Retrieved December 13, 2017.
- Benjamin Freed (December 13, 2017). "How a Group of Native American Activists Used Fake News to Push for a Redskins Name Change". The Washingtonian. Retrieved December 13, 2017.
- Samantha Pell (December 14, 2017). "'Washington Redhawks' organizers claim success, say articles were satire, not 'fake news'". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
- Erik Brady (May 10, 2013). "Daniel Snyder says Redskins will never change name". USA Today. Retrieved September 30, 2014.
- Michelle Boorstein (October 9, 2013). "Letter from Washington Redskins owner Dan Snyder to fans". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- Michelle Boorstein (October 12, 2013). "Letter from Red Cloud Indian School on the Washington Redskins name". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 18, 2013.
- Eric Simons (January 30, 2015). "The psychology of why sports fans see their teams as extensions of themselves". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 20, 2016.
- Eric Simons (2013). The Secret Lives of Sports Fans. The Overlook Press. ISBN 1590208641. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- Allen R McConnell Ph.D. (July 13, 2015). "The Psychology of Sports Fandom". Psychology Today. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- Associated Press. "U.S. reps urge end to 'Redskins'". ESPN. Retrieved June 13, 2013.
- "Roger Goodell defends Washington Redskins' nickname". NFL.com Wire Reports. June 12, 2013. Retrieved June 13, 2013.
- "Roger Goodell Insists Washington Redskins Won't Change Name After MLB's Indians Ditch Chief Wahoo". January 31, 2018. Retrieved February 1, 2018.
- "3rd Annual NFL Poll" (PDF). Public Policy Polling. January 2, 2014. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- "Poll: Americans Don't Want Name Change". The Washington Redskins. January 2, 2014. Archived from the original on October 26, 2017. Retrieved May 31, 2018.
- Bruce Allen (May 23, 2014). "The Truth about the Redskins Name and Logo" (PDF). The Washington Redskins. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- Dan Steinberg (October 15, 2013). "Charles Krauthammer and George Will debate 'Redskins'". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- Pat Buchanan (October 22, 2013). "Hail to the Redskins!". Real Clear Politics. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- W. James Antle III (November 13, 2013). "Redskins: A Manufactured Controversy". The National Interest. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- Rich Lowry (October 8, 2013). "Liberals Fabricate Outrage Over 'Redskins': The team name is an anachronism, but a harmless one". National Review. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- Dennis Prager (August 13, 2013). "The Left vs. the Redskins: Teaching people to take offense is one of the Left's black arts". National Review. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
- "Native American Chief Talks About Redskins". Washington Redskins. May 3, 2013. Archived from the original on May 6, 2013. Retrieved September 30, 2014.
- Cindy Boren (June 12, 2013). "Roger Goodell defends Redskins nickname in a letter to Congress". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- Dave McKenna (June 27, 2013). "Redskins' Indian-Chief Defender: Not A Chief, Probably Not Indian". Deadspin. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- Theresa Vargas (November 16, 2013). "One Indian says he loves the Redskins and doesn't want Dan Snyder to change the name". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 18, 2013.
- Paul Woody (May 15, 2013). "American Indians in Va. have no problem with "Redskins"". Richmond Times-Dispatch. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- Dan Steinberg (May 29, 2013). "Retired Patawomeck chief says he'd be offended if Redskins change name". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 22, 2014.
- Mark Sullivan (July 3, 2014). "Patawomeck Tribe: Snyder Could Rename the Redskins After Us". The American Sectator. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- Matthew Brown; Felicia Fonseca (November 27, 2013). "Code Talker says Redskins name not derogatory". AP News. Archived from the original on November 29, 2013. Retrieved September 27, 2014.
- Mike Jones (November 25, 2013). "Redskins honor members of the Navajo Code Talkers Association". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- Erik Brady (November 27, 2013). "Woman suing Redskins says Code Talkers honor 'sugercoats' racism". USA Today. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- Benjamin Freed (November 26, 2013). "Redskins Honor World War II-Era Navajo Code Talkers, Awkwardness Ensues: No one was fooled by the team's publicity stunt". The Washingtonian. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- Megan Finnerty (October 10, 2014). "Washington Redskins pay for Natives to attend Cardinals game". AZCentral. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- Dan Steinberg (August 12, 2014). "The Redskins now have their own YouTube video about the team name". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- Laura Stampler (August 12, 2014). "Washington Redskins Defend Name With Help From Native Americans". Time Inc. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- "Washington NFL team video features Indian Country supporters". indianz.com. August 13, 2014. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- Dave McKenna (October 7, 2014). "Is The Redskins' "VIP" Indian Defender A Fake Indian?". Deadspin. Retrieved November 21, 2017.
- Harry Enten (June 20, 2014). "The Politics of the Washington Redskins Name Controversy". FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Scott Clement (September 2, 2014). "New poll says large majority of Americans believe Redskins should not change name". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Sarah Larimer (October 10, 2014). "N.J. lawmakers introduce Redskins resolutions, ask retailers to avoid the name". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Peter Callaghan. "Minneapolis City Council takes steps to ban offensive nickname from U of M stadium". MINNPOST. Retrieved October 3, 2014.
- "Bills". New York State Assembly. Retrieved July 31, 2014.
- "New York State Lawmakers Denounce 'Redskins' Name, Pass Unanimous Resolution". Indian Country Today. May 20, 2014. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- The Associated Press (July 10, 2015). "California Assembly votes to urge Washington Redskins to ditch 'degrading' name". Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- David Nakamura (October 5, 2013). "Obama: 'I'd think about changing' Washington Redskins team name". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 5, 2013.
- Jordan Fabian (November 5, 2015). "Obama: Teams should drop Native American mascots". The Hill. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- "Letter to NFL Commissioner". May 21, 2014. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Mark Maske (May 22, 2014). "Senate Democrats urge NFL to endorse name change for Redskins". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Philip Bump (September 4, 2014). "Surprise! The debate over the Washington Redskins' name change is partisan". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Shadee Ashtari (September 3, 2014). "Marco Rubio: It Is Dan Snyder's 'Right To Keep' Controversial NFL Team Name". Huffington Post. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- John Keim (October 5, 2015). "Donald Trump: Redskins a 'positive' name, Washington shouldn't change". ESPN. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Serge Kovaleski (October 28, 1993). "Delays Push Back Stadium's Chances for 1995 Opening". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 26, 2013.
- Mike DeBonis (January 9, 2013). "Redskins name change should be discussed, Vincent Gray says". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 26, 2013.
- J. P. Finlay (January 4, 2015). "New D.C. Mayor wants Redskins back in city, but with new name". Comcast Sportsnet. Archived from the original on January 7, 2015. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- John Keim (August 17, 2015). "Bruce Allen: Redskins won't change name in order to build new home". ESPN. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Ryan Nobles (August 27, 2014). "McAuliffe and Snyder have met to discuss Redskins stadium". NBC12. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Philip Speake (September 16, 2011). "Washington Redskins and Baltimore Ravens Fans Battle for Maryland Supremacy". Bleacher Report. Retrieved June 29, 2014.
- Mike DeBonis (October 16, 2013). "Prince George's County executive calls on Redskins to consider name change". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Bill Turque (November 25, 2013). "Leggett considers asking Montgomery council to join in call for renaming Redskins". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Benjamin Freed (August 5, 2014). "Martin O'Malley Says the Redskins Should Change Their Name". Washingtonian. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- John Woodrow Cox; Jonathan O'Connell (April 11, 2015). "Tug of war for new Redskins stadium is complicated by name debate". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Anita Kumar; Mark Maske (June 6, 2012). "Redskins moving training camp to Richmond in 2013". THe Washington Post. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Jonah Goldberg (September 26, 2013). "Terry McAuliffe, the Redskins, and the Big Lies of Liberalism". National Review. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Brian McNally (August 1, 2014). "Virginia Gov. Says It's Not His Place To Comment on Redskins Name". CBS Local Media. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Ian Gordon; Matt Connolly (November 22, 2013). "Are Coke and FedEx Worried About Sponsoring the Redskins?". Mother Jones. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Michael Lewis; Manish Tripathi (June 24, 2014). "'Redskins' Is Bad Business". The New York Times. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Tom Van Riper (June 14, 2013). "Why The Washington Redskins Will Never Change Their Name". Forbes. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Christian Turner (January 30, 2015). "The Redskins Should Change Their Name For The Sake Of Their Brand". MediaPost. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Chris Isidore (September 4, 2014). "Redskins gear stiff-armed by fans". CNN Money. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Mark Holan (June 25, 2014). "From Redskins sponsors, mostly silence — 'They are not in position to take public stands'". Washington Business Journal. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Curt Autry (July 16, 2015). "Despite controversy, Redskins rise in value". WWBT. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- "Forbes Announces The World's Most Valuable Sports Teams". Forbes. July 15, 2015. Retrieved November 18, 2017.
- Zielonka, Adam; Sinn, Dylan (December 19, 2017). "More than a Mascot: Redskins High Schools". Philip Merrill College of Journalism. Capital News Service. Retrieved December 20, 2017.
- Melanie Mason (October 11, 2015). "California schools barred from using 'Redskins' as team name or mascot". Los Angeles Times.
- "Miami Tribe Relations". Retrieved October 24, 2017.
- Murray Evans (April 22, 1998). "A Storm on the Horizon SNU Changes Nickname, Mascot". NewsOK.com. Retrieved October 24, 2017.
- "60% Don't Think Washington Redskins Should Change Their Name". Rasmussen Reports. June 24, 2014. Retrieved November 17, 2017.
- "Poll: 71 percent say keep Redskins". ESPN.com. September 2, 2014.
- "Results of SurveyUSA News Poll #20802". October 15, 2013. Retrieved November 13, 2014.
- "Should the Washington Redskins change their name?". The Washington Post. July 30, 2013. Retrieved October 16, 2013.
- Greg Cohen (September 25, 2014). "DC Speaks: Keep Redskins name". WUSA. Archived from the original on October 8, 2014. Retrieved May 31, 2018.
- "Americans Evenly Divided on Super Bowl; Brady a Lightning Rod" (PDF). Public Policy Polling. February 5, 2016. Retrieved November 17, 2017.
- Chuck Modiano (February 26, 2016). "Hey, Dan Snyder: New poll shows young NFL fans want name change in Washington". New York Daily News. Retrieved November 17, 2017.
- John E. Hoover (October 19, 2013). "Gray: Redskins is a slur, but other nicknames objectify Native Americans". Tulsa World. Retrieved October 20, 2013.
- Charles Springwood (February 2004). "I'M Indian Too!: Claiming Native American Identity, Crafting Authority in Mascot Debates". Journal of sport and social issues. 28: 56. doi:10.1177/0193732503261477.
- Natasha Dhillon; Justin Hemmings; Maggie Scales; William Stanley (February 11, 2014). "11 Reasons to Ignore the 10-Year-Old Annenberg Survey About the Washington Football Team's Offensive Name". Glushko-Samuelson Intellectual Property Law Clinic. Retrieved November 17, 2017.
- Geoff Nunberg (August 3, 2015). "Designers of that 2004 Annenberg survey on the Redskins name: The sample was unrepresentative". Glushko-Samuelson Intellectual Property Law Clinic. Retrieved November 17, 2017.
- Scott Clement; Emily Guskin (May 19, 2016). "How The Washington Post conducted the survey on the Redskins' name". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 17, 2017.
- "Washington Post poll of Native Americans on Redskins' team name - Survey conducted December 16, 2015 to April 12, 2016". The Washington Post. Retrieved May 24, 2016.
- "NCAI Response to New Poll on R*skins Team Name". National Congress of American Indians. May 19, 2016. Retrieved August 8, 2016.
- "NAJA and UNITY respond to recent Washington NFL team name poll". Native American Journalists Association. May 20, 2016. Retrieved November 17, 2017.
- James V. Fenelon (2014). "Survey on Redskins team name found most American Indians believe it to be offensive and racist" (PDF). California State University, San Bernardino. Retrieved June 22, 2014.