Zhangt2413, you are invited to the Teahouse

edit
 

Hi Zhangt2413! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:34, 14 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Welcome

edit

Hello, Zhangt2413, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. If you are looking for help, please do any of the following:

There are a lot of standards and policies here, but as long as you are editing in good faith, you are encouraged to be bold in updating pages. Here are a few links you might find useful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~), which produces your name and the current date. Also, it would be a huge help if you could explain each of your edits with an edit summary. Again, welcome! Snowman (talk) 21:33, 19 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Ruff

edit

Hi Zhang, thanks for your useful comments at Ruff. Just to let you know that is normal to add comments to the bottom of talk pages, they may be overlooked elsewhere, Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:47, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply


Sunbird

edit

Hi, nice work, nothing to fault that I can see. The one change I made was to switch to British English spelling, since the three English-speaking countries in the range use that form of English, so AE isn't appropriate — but you weren't to know that Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:14, 26 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Golden-winged Sunbird

edit

Yngvadottir (talk) 00:02, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Crypsis and Frequency-dependent selection

edit

Hi, I see you've added a claim to Crypsis. Do you have a source for that, and perhaps to elaborate it a little? Otherwise it will have to be removed as unsourced. Please see WP:REFB if you need help. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:54, 28 November 2012 (UTC)Reply


Also in Frequency-dependent selection - what paper are you citing, and why? Without a source and a reason for the claim, it quickly becomes worthless as nobody can tell if it's true or what it may mean. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:56, 28 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Scaly-breasted Munia

edit

Hey Tony, so with our assignment to nominate articles for GA-status yesterday, the one you've been putting a lot of work into has been reviewed. I don't want to completely commandeer it from you, so how would you feel about working in tandem to address the comments? My big issue is that you probably have the sources to get useful info included, whereas I can make edits to trimming/arranging sections or adding taxonomic info. and expand the lead. Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nsavalia23 Nsavalia23 (talk) 04:15, 29 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hey Zhangt2413, just wanted to let you know that the Scaly-breasted Munia is now up to GA-status!! Thanks for all the front-end work you put in and the help with the review process. And of course, congrats! Have a great holiday, see you next semester. Nsavalia23 (talk) 17:26, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply