Zarita

It is felt that the article you created at Swanepoel is not suitable for a Wikipedia article, which must have a notable subject and be verifiable. I have moved it to User:Zarita, which is where users are free to write about themselves. You are at liberty to move it back into the (Main) namespace but bear in mind that if you do so, it is likely to be nominated for deletion.

Note, however, that the purpose of a user page is to enable active editors of Wikipedia to introduce themselves to other editors. Wikipedia is not a general hosting service, so your user page is not a personal homepage. Content unrelated to Wikipedia or its editing is likely to be removed.

Please see the user page guidelines, especially this section for more information.

Please read WP:AUTO. The recommendation is always: wait until someone else writes a bio about you. Even the title was arrogant: OK it is an unusual surname but do you think you are the only Swanepoel who will ever qualify for Wikipedia? -- RHaworth 09:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Real estate trends

Good intro expansion. I hope it will ead to some worthwhile additions. Viva-Verdi 02:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Stefan Swanepoel, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Stefan Swanepoel was changed by Zarita (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-09-07T22:08:16+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 02:08, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Flowanda | Talk 06:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

To Flowanda

If the material is not suitable for Wikipedia, I apologize. Here is however my thinking for adding it in the first place. I do not see the whitepapers by Stefan Swanepoel as advertising or soapboxing. The seven whitepapers he penned include extensive research and each whitepaper is some 24 pages in length. The whitepapers were not sold but provided free to the industry and is some of the most detailed research available regarding each respective topic. Residential real estate is renowned for a shortage of good information and no-one has tried to improve this more by authoring more whitepapers and reports on change and trends in the real estate industry than Mr. Swanepoel.

Thank you for offering me the opportuity to discuss this with you.

Zarita (talk) 02:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Swanepoel Trends Report 07 lg.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Swanepoel Trends Report 07 lg.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:34, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for File:The One Minute Manager.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The One Minute Manager.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:06, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Surviving your Serengeti, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, see:

• Policy on neutral point of view
• Guideline on spam
• Guideline on external links
• Guideline on conflict of interest

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and how to develop articles
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Article wizard for creating new articles
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Flowanda | Talk 10:41, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Zarita (talk) 19:21, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi Flowanda

Thank you for your edits and help. In response to your question about the multiple "best sellers" reference. The term "best seller" is widely used in a loose manner (as I am sure you have seen). Few authors can actually prove that the book made it to a creditable "best seller" list such as the New York Times, Wall Street Journal or USA Today.

As there is no one "best seller" list and therefore the highly regarded NYT and WSJ have become the premier authorities in determining what is a best seller and is more sought-after than say Amazon.com. As the newspapers use different algorithms in determining what defines a "best seller" a book can appear on one list and not another. Only a small handful of books actually get listed by all the leading newspapers.

I was trying to provide the validation that Surviving Your Serengeti by Swanepoel was indeed ranked as a best seller by all the leading newspapers.

• Just trying to keep the article this side of being deleted if it ever came to that, but you can review WP:NOTABILITY and WP:NBOOK for yourself, as well as looking at other articles on similar books to see how they are written. Flowanda | Talk 02:54, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of South African writers may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Stefan Swanepoel]] (raised in South Africa and now lives in [[United States]] (born 1958)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:13, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stefan Swanepoel may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• an annual list of the 200 most powerful people in [[residential real estate]] in northern America ([[United States]] and [[Canada]]. The list is described as the most comprehensive list <ref>[http://

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:51, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swanepoel Power 200, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Century 21 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:39, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Swanepoel Power 200

added links pointing to Madison, Washington, CA, IL, MN, TX, WA, CO, NRT, COO, Founder, Mark Willis, San Jose and Move

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

Hello, Zarita. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.Deb (talk) 12:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stefan Swanepoel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swanepoel Power 200, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NRT. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Swanepoel Power 200.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Swanepoel Power 200.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2016 SP 200 cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2016 SP 200 cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Swanepoel Power 200

The article Swanepoel Power 200 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A fairly obvious press release, not an encyclopedia article. Loaded with references -- to the bios of people being name-dropped here. Arguably qualifies for speedy deletion as an advertisement.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Calton | Talk 13:52, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Zarita. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Swanepoel Power 200, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Calton | Talk 13:56, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Swanepoel Power 200 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swanepoel Power 200 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swanepoel Power 200 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Calton | Talk 23:58, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Surviving Your Serengeti

The article Surviving Your Serengeti has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Another bog-standard business-advice book, propped up by a "Forbes Contributor" blog posting and a couple of passing mentions on specialist "bestselling books" lists.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Calton | Talk 00:26, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Surviving Your Serengeti cover copy.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Surviving Your Serengeti cover copy.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:39, 23 March 2018 (UTC)