User talk:Wjhonson/Archive7

Latest comment: 16 years ago by SatyrBot in topic LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

Hi, a of what Justiceleague1 is saying about Donna Thomas seems to be personal. Thomas is Boham's legal advocate. One of his public defender's is Eric Zale, Thomas routinly talks to Zale, and provides information to him. Also Justice keeps bringing up other cases that Thomas is working on, that has nothing to do with Boham so why does she bring it up? Thomas was on a PBS Show in March 07 with Boham's mother called Colorado Outspoken, the moderator of the show is named Darrell Johnson (303)832-7389 the producer of the show has a signed copy of the legal retainer agreement that is signed by Boham and Thomas, thanks!

As the creator of Reliability noticeboard, which is the subject of this (not quite) war, I thought you'd like to comment.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  22:33, 15 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

New to WikiProject Criminal Biography

edit

I am a fairly new member to this project. I am trying to start a Serial Killer task force. I have found a few members who would like to join. Any suggestions on how to start one? What are your interests as far as Crime goes? Jmm6f488 23:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Serial Killer Task Force

edit

The task force is up and running at Serial Killer Task Force. Come see if you would like to join! Jmm6f488 08:04, 24 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

You have earlier commented on the mass deletions of external links. Please see this here, about some guy that is mass deleting links to the katinkahesselink website. --Voidocore 15:50, 3 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Delivered on 16:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC).

Barnstar Mockery

edit

On May 7th of this year, at 14:37, the user page User:Dr Spam (MD) was created. Within a period of 48 hours, User:Dr Spam (MD) had placed approximately 55 barnstars on user pages and user talk pages. Many recipients doubted the sincerity of the sentiments behind these barnstars, in part because of the comments placed by Dr Spam on the barnstars. A sampling of the reasons that Dr. Spam offered for presenting barnstars to editors:

  • Hi - I am putting this here in case there's trouble later. Please accept this tireless barnstar thing for all of your wiki-activity. Thanks. User:Dr Spam (MD) 16:08, 11 May 2007

  • Hi I am leaving you with this barnstar for you to reflect carefully on. I will provide the citation in a few days once you have had the opportunity to consider why I might think that you deserve it. Peace User:Dr Spam (MD) 16:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

  • Well done for all of your fantastic editing / writing: you are obviously a genius of our day, shining like the brightest barnstar against a dark barnnight in these new and difficult wiki-times. I therefore award you the surreal barnstar (I can't get the other barnstars to work properly - my apologies.) Please note that you have no right to remove the barnstar, for it is sacred. LEAVE WELL ALONE! Many thanks.

  • cool editing
  • Awesome
  • Cool.
  • I am awarding you a surreal barnstar because you obviously deserve it! Keep up the good work - don't slacken off, it'll get harder before it gets easier!
  • Hy my cat (the fat white one) is awarding you this barnstar of diligence because he doesn't eat fish either. He just likes to eat biscuits - or so he says. But how then does he get so fat????

Occasionally Dr. Spam's comments did appear sincere (if vague), but a review of the record indicates that sincere-appearing comments were generally generated during a massive cut-and-paste session. There were also many barnstars presented with no comments at all, and even more that User:Dr Spam (MD) presented without signing his name to indicate from whom the award was coming. And some barnstars, praising the editing skills of the recipient, were awarded to editors with one solitary edit to their name.

In response, once this pattern of apparent insincerity was established, a few experienced editors asked Dr. Spam to desist from barnstar spamming, in the belief that randomly awarding barnstars devalues the entire barnstar program. (Indeed, so random was the placement of barnstars, that some were even placed on wiki accounts that had not been active for over a year.) Dr. Spam has now stopped, presumably recognizing that his efforts were not appreciated by the majority of editors.

Most of the barnstars placed by Dr. Spam during his May campaign have been voluntarily removed by the editors on whose pages they were placed. You are receiving this notice because Dr. Spam's barnstar still remains on your page. If you feel that Dr. Spam's barnstar spamming was a form of mockery, you may choose to remove it yourself. But if the way this barnstar was "awarded" does not bother you, you are of course free to keep it on your page. After all, it is your page. This notification was simply for your information. HuskyHuskie 14:06, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

SBS membership renewal request—Project in great need of contributors

edit

The summer has passed (unless you live in the Southern Hemisphere), and for most people holidays are over. Therefore, it is time for work again. Not that work ever stops in Wikipedia, but I believe we can at last get over the stage when slow progress can be taken for granted. Like yourself, most members of WikiProject Succession Box Standardization have been away during most of the summer (and some of you have been away for much longer); this lack of contributors has almost led SBS activity to a standstill.

A couple of members have stayed, however, and things have greatly improved in the project. There is a renovated and functional main page; the talk page has organised archives and a dedicated page for archived proposals; the Guidelines page is in a very good shape and I am preparing a further set of guidelines to be proposed for adoption by the project and incorporation into the page; the Documentation page has been again updated and a potential restructuring is being planned; the Templates list is the operations centre for the ongoing removal of antiquated and redundant templates. The Offices page is the only one that has yet to be improved, but there is a proposal for that one as well. Even a new SBS navbox has been created and added to the project's pages, easing navigation between the different parts of the WikiProject, while shortcuts have been created for the three most basic pages.

And the project itself is not the only thing that has been improved; the headers system has been cleared up and rationalised during the last six months, and a new parameter system is being inserted into templates like s-new and s-vac in order to successfully adapt succession boxes to more tricky cases of succession without large, clumsy cells or redundant reasoning. S-hou has also been improved and /doc pages have been added to most of the headers' pages, as well as to many proper succession templates' ones.

Despite all these breakthroughs that have made SBS a better, more functional and more user-friendly WikiProject, things move excruciatingly slowly as far as the adoption of proposals and correction/improvement of succession boxes in the mainspace are concerned. As has been mentioned, this is due to the utter absence of all but two of its members. I completely understand that a few of them might be unwilling to resume work in SBS, and some of them might even have left Wikipedia altogether. However, we are certain that there are people intent to continue improving Wikipedia's succession boxes and helping others to do so as well. If you are one of them, please return. And even if you cannot help at the moment, but want to contribute at a later time, please let us know by renewing your membership. You can do that very easily by removing the asterisk next to your name in the member list in SBS's main page. The deadline is 31 October; members that do not renew their memberships until 23:59 of that day will be removed from the list, as these members will be assumed to have left the project for good.

SBS is a project highly capable of doing some serious work in Wikipedia. These potentials are seriously undermined by the unavailability of helpful hands. I hope you shall consider this message seriously before taking any decisions.

Thank you for your time. Waltham, The Duke of 14:45, 17 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Better Things to Do Than This?

edit

Mr. Wjhonson,

I'm a bit surprised at some of the recent edits you made to this article (below):


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_J._Boham

Removing material doesn't make this a better article.

Likewise, I'm disappointed that the Matt Sanchez article has basically become the 'Matt Sanchez' blog, and factual references to his escorting services have been removed.


I believe we can 'work together' rather than engage in 'friendly fire' in these endeavors.Ryoung122 08:10, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Request for Comment on User Conduct - Matt Sanchez / Bluemarine

edit

Hello, may I ask for your participation in an RFC established for user Bluemarine/Matt Sanchez? The reason for the Request for Comment is set out in the RFC summary here. Whether you support or oppose it, your input would be appreciated.Typing monkey 18:15, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply


Urgent request-Comment on Article for Deletion

edit

Hi there - Thank you for your participation in the Bluemarine request for comment. On a related, but broader note, I thought perhaps you'd like to comment on the proposed deletion of a proposed "Dubious Sources" category? This isn't discussed as it should be within Wikipedia, in my opinion.Typing Monkey - (type to me) 03:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Recent Controversy over Matt Sanchez

edit

Wjhonson,

Any idea who the recent editor was that was 'banned' from the Matt Sanchez article? Also, I'm beginning to shift my personal thoughts on this. I don't think that User:BlueMarine should be permanently banned. It's better to err on the side of freedom of expression. To me, the worst possible outcome of the Matt Sanchez article is a sanitized version that deletes any/all references to the controversies which made Sanchez 'famous' in the first place.Ryoung122 09:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Biography Newsletter 5

edit

To receive this newsletter in the future, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 16:08, 7 October 2007 (UTC) .Reply

Delivered on 17:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC).

Delivered on 12:00, 1 November 2007 (UTC).

Elvis Presley

edit

If you have issues with the references and footnotes, LaraLove introduced the current format. She changed things to help bring the article up to GA standard. Rikstar 05:23, 13 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

LGBT WikiProject Newsletter

edit

Delivered on 20:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 21:34, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply