Your submission at Articles for creation: Smurfette Principle has been accepted

edit
 
Smurfette Principle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:27, 22 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Pelagic Life

edit

Hi! I've reverted your changes to México Pelágico – that page, with all its problems, is about a film. If you think the NGO is notable enough to merit an article in Wikipedia you can start one; if you then think that the film page should be merged into it, you can propose a {{merge}} for discussion. However, I doubt the NGO would pass our notability requirements - there seems to be minimal coverage of it in reliable sources, and what there is seems to say that it is a personal project of Jorge Cervera Hauser and a few friends. I note that the first source you cited, Global shark currency: the distribution, frequency, and economic value of shark ecotourism by Austin J. Gallagher and Neil Hammerschlag, has no mention whatsoever of "Pelagic Life". Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:03, 7 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

May 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Philip J Fry. I noticed that you recently removed content from Juana Inés without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Philip J Fry Talk to me 01:25, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

La Casa de las Flores

edit

Thank you for your fine work in expanding La Casa de las Flores. Edwardx (talk) 17:43, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Somos. (July 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Nightenbelle (talk) 14:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Virginiaduras! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nightenbelle (talk) 14:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Somos. (July 31)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tol was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Tol (talk | contribs) @ 19:18, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Somos. has been accepted

edit
 
Somos., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

2pou (talk) 17:26, 2 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Malinche (series) has been accepted

edit
 
Malinche (series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 20:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coffee (2014 documentary) has been accepted

edit
 
Coffee (2014 documentary), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi, as you can see I have accepted this draft, but just wanted to say that the sourcing is a little bit weak: if you can find more WP:RS sources to consolidate notability, and add more citations to support the article contents better, please do, because I'm slightly concerned that this could be open to a notability challenge.
Another thing: if you have translated this article from eg. the Spanish wiki, you need to attribute the original, see WP:HOWTRANS.
Best, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brenda Navarro has been accepted

edit
 
Brenda Navarro, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 09:58, 24 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guacamaya (hacktivists) (January 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 19:00, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Guacamaya (hacktivists)

edit

  Hello, Virginiaduras. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Guacamaya (hacktivists), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:05, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Guacamaya (hacktivists)

edit
 

Hello, Virginiaduras. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Guacamaya".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:04, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply