Topcat1066
Welcome! edit
Hello, Topcat1066, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mathglot (talk) 07:00, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Disruptive editing edit
Your first two edits here are inappropriate. You state that you "clarify" that Eric Zemmour is not far right here, but you clarified nothing; you simply removed well-sourced content. Then you edit warred to remove it again.[1] This is disruptive editing. You will be blocked if you do something like that again. Bishonen | tålk 07:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC).
Eric Zemmour edit
duplicates the section above
|
|---|
|
(edit conflict) Please do not remove sourced content, as you did in these two edits at Éric Zemmour. The fact that Zemmour is a politician with far-right views is sourced by numerous reliable sources. Many analysts who look at French national politics place him to the right of far-right candidate Marine Le Pen. If you wish to change the description in the article as "far-right", you should open a discussion on the Talk page of the article, and try to gain a consensus for your views among other editors. But please don't just remove far-right from the article over and over, because that could be considered edit-warring. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at my Talk page. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 07:12, 9 May 2022 (UTC) |
May 2022 edit
Hello, I'm NonsensicalSystem. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Black Liberation Army, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. NonsensicalSystem(error?)(.log) 12:32, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Final warning edit
The next time you add contentious material to an article while ignoring the talkpage, you will be blocked. Use Talk:Black Liberation Army to try to get consensus for calling the organization "terrorist", and do take a look at what's already there on that subject! You are interested in editing controversial articles and subjects, but have never touched a talkpage. That's not how Wikipedia is supposed to work. Bishonen | tålk 13:12, 18 May 2022 (UTC).
June 2022 edit
Hi Topcat1066! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Kathy Boudin several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Kathy Boudin, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 13:26, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- A further word about your edits at Kathy Boudin: in this edit on 20 June, you linked another Wikipedia article in your edit summary, providing it, apparently, as evidence for why your preferred content at the Boudin article is the right one. However, you should be aware that self-published sources cannot be used as evidence of anything at Wikipedia, and in particular, Wikipedia itself is therefore not a reliable source because anyone can edit Wikipedia, as you have experienced yourself. Going forward, please base all of your edits at Wikipedia on the content of WP:Reliable sources, such as published books, magazines, academic journals, reputable newspapers, and certain websites found to be reliable due to their high standards of editing, sourcing, and peer review. If in doubt, please consult the Reliable sources noticeboard. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 17:45, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Topcat1066, you reverted an edit of mine and PDGPA's with very little explanation and no talk page engagement. Please use the article talk page and build consensus for disputed changes. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:59, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Important Notice edit
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 08:50, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Blocked edit
You have been blocked for a month for persistent tendentious editing after several warnings, recently at Kathy Boudin, Black Liberation Army, and Rose City Antifa. You can request unblock by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 15:13, 11 July 2022 (UTC).
- I don't give a flying fuck. I will continue to edit as I see fit. You will never stop me. Ha ha!! You sad deluded weirdo. Topcat1066 (talk) 08:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)