Language edit

Hola Tia! I appreciate the information you are adding to The Walking Dead pages, however some of your sentences use poor grammar that seem to be due to simple translations from Spanish to English. In particular, you use the word "this" esto or "it" eso when referring to a person, when the pronoun "he", "him", él or "she", "her" élla makes more sense. Here is an example of some cleanup I did on your recent edits - hopefully it will help you make better word choices. ¡Felices Pascuas! Hoof Hearted (talk) 16:04, 2 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Tia Canita. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Image without license edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Avi Nash.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Avi Nash.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 03:45, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

February 2019 edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of The Walking Dead (TV series) characters, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:06, 22 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Keep deleting entire sections, including headings and wikilinks, without any explanation, and I'll be happy to ask someone to block you. Drmies (talk) 16:11, 22 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Grammar issues edit

I'm going to assume English isn't your first language, as you constantly refer to females with male pronouns (he, him, his) instead of female versions (she, her, hers), as well as various grammar issues. For example, here you referred to Samantha Morton as "his"; I later fixed it. Here you referred to Alpha and Lydia as "his"; which I also fixed as well as the various other grammar problems. I also suggest looking at the copyedits I made to the summary, because you made several errors including run-on sentences and incorrect use of commas. Hopefully you can remember this when you make further edits. Thank you.

Edit: I just noticed another editor made this similar comment 10 months ago. Drovethrughosts (talk) 14:53, 25 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

It's been a year and half since your use of incorrect pronouns was pointed out to you, yet you still refer to women using male pronouns (such as "his" or "him"). Here's a recent example. I understand English may not be your first language, but can you please recognize this mistake and not do it any further? Drovethrughosts (talk) 17:20, 13 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

It's now March 2020, almost two years since you were originally warned about your incorrect gender pronoun use, and you still make these errors as seen in the recent Walking Dead summaries such as here when an IP fixed them for you. Maybe writing lengthy episode summaries is above your capability when it comes to writing in English, because the run-on sentences, weird grammar, and odd word choices still persist and have to be cleaned up by other editors every time. Can you please respond and acknowledge this issue because a refusal to communicate can seen as disruptive. Thank you. Drovethrughosts (talk) 17:12, 2 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

I agree with others who have pointed out your English language skills aren’t quite up to writing extensive plot summaries. You have changed summaries that made perfect sense into garbled messes. I have fixed several instances of your poor grammar. Afheather (talk) 09:02, 23 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8)) edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Judith Grimes. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:43, 26 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

While I agree with you that Judith should have an article, you can't remove the AFD template until the discussion is resolved (hopefully as "Keep") and I have seen you do this a few times already. Please be aware that you can be blocked for this behavior, so please stop. BOZ (talk) 15:01, 26 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Kenric Green moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Kenric Green, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 07:08, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Image without license edit

Unspecified source/license for File:Cassady McClincy.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Cassady McClincy.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:00, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Cassady McClincy.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Cassady McClincy.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:45, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Plot length tags edit

Please be aware that WP had strict guidelines on the length of plot sections on articles. TV episodes cannot have a plot longer than 400 words. Removing the plot warning tags on the Walking Dead episodes can be something that can be reported to WP:ANI and action taken if you continue to remove this without fixing them. --Masem (t) 02:31, 27 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020 edit

 

Your recent editing history at Open Your Eyes (The Walking Dead) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You have been told to leave the plot warning message in place until it is fixed but you keep removing it. Masem (t) 04:07, 27 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 1 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alpha (The Walking Dead), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morning Star (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 1 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Image without license edit

Unspecified source/license for File:The Walking Dead Season 10 Episode 5 "What It Always Is".jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:The Walking Dead Season 10 Episode 5 "What It Always Is".jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 12:46, 9 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Unspecified source/license for File:Silencethewhisperers.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Silencethewhisperers.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 12:46, 9 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, Tia Canita

Thank you for creating Jordan Woods-Robinson.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:43, 18 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dahlia Legault for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dahlia Legault is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dahlia Legault until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 23:42, 19 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8)) edit

  Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Dahlia Legault. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:31, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

May 2020 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Dahlia Legault. Praxidicae (talk) 15:26, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 25 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ... I Lose Myself, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadline.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:14, 25 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 14 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The End Is the Beginning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Decider.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 14 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sleigh Ride (Fear the Walking Dead) into Nick Clark (character). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:31, 27 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The World Before (The Walking Dead) and other articles for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted:

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triggerfinger (The Walking Dead) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:09, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Angel Theory for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angel Theory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angel Theory until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 2 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited No Other Way (The Walking Dead), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Insider.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request) edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Walking Dead (season 11) into The Lucky Ones (The Walking Dead). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:21, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

She did it at the page for the Warlords episode, too. I can’t figure out if it’s because she doesn’t understand what you’re saying or if she just doesn’t care. Her whole talk page is warnings about her editing. Afheather (talk) 17:25, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

ANI Notice edit

  There is currently a discussion at Administrators' Noticeboard regarding competence and copyright violations. The thread is Tia Canita. The discussion is about the topic The Walking Dead (season 11). Thank you. Afheather (talk) 17:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC) 17:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

At no time did I violate the author's rights, I only tried to improve the joints to those who accused me, I asked them from all hearts that didn't bother them to help me improve them, please Tia Canita (talk) 18:07, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

February 2024 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for gross incompetence. Specifically, you have repeatedly violated copyright despite numerous warnings, plus your own writing and grasp of the English language is nowhere near the standards expected on a project to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 19:23, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply