| Candidate | Date added | Last 250 article space edits |
Good/featured work | Notes | Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banedon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) | 13 November | 2 years | Nothing | A few run-ins with this user, nothing positive to say about them in any sense. Highly limited encyclopedic contributions, no indication of any experience or capability in the role of arbitration. And the "Justice comes first" mantra is deeply disturbing. This is a volunteer project, not the European Court of Human Rights. Completely off-putting. | Absolutely no way in a million years |
| Beeblebrox (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) | 12 November | 2 years | Nothing | Little recent interaction but the editor is a former Arb, I'm not sure if that's a good thing or not. But a bit of institutional memory doesn't go amiss, particularly when it comes to making sure the same old mistakes aren't made by the committee. | Maybe |
| Cabayi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) | 16 November | 3 years | 1 FL | Yes | |
| Dark Clouds of Joy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) | 15 November | 3 years | Nothing | Presumably a joke candidate, taking no questions and has been around Wikipedia with this account for just over a year, but quite possibly still not the worst contestant in the show. Now blocked after a YEAR of activity!! | No |
| Donald Albury (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) | 15 November | 2 years | Nothing | Bloody hell, a new contestant with actual concern for continuing to make Wikipedia an encyclopedia rather than just spend their entire time here at drama boards or hat collecting. Impressed. Will need time to make further research, but instinctively this is a good nominee. | Yes |
| Enterprisey (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) | 16 November | 3 years | Nothing | Could barely put the nomination together, and practically unknown in the sense that there's been no obvious ability to communicate with editors, with dispute resolution, and this last-gasp desperate application speaks volumes. | No |
| Izno (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) | 16 November | 2 years | Maybe | ||
| Guerillero (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) | 16 November | 3 years | 1 FA (2020), 8 GAs | Maybe | |
| Opabinia regalis (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) | 16 November | 2 years | 2 FAs, 2 former FAs | Former arb, content contributor, probably as close to a no-brainer outside WTT as we'll get in this bunch of contestants. | Yes |
| Thryduulf (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) | 16 November | 2 years | Maybe | ||
| Worm That Turned (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) | 8 November | 4 years | 2 FAs (2013, 2016) 29 GAs |
I've had several very productive encounters with WTT, both formally as an Arb and informally. Although their contributions to the content of the encyclopedia have been lately very lacking, I may already break my unwritten rule of declining to support. When interacting with the content creation community, they speak in plain terms and don't condescend or patronise, which is helpful. | Yes |
| Wugapodes (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) | 15 November | 3 years | 2 FAs, 3 GAs | Been around the block (in a good way), capable of decency and level-headedness. Mediocre contribution to the actual content of the encyclopedia but seems clearly able to argue their way out of a paper bag without unduly unsettling all of the natives. | Yes |
