Techguy91

February 2016

Hello, I'm Krj373. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Biographies of living persons has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I have restored the redirect. Krj373^{*(talk), *(contrib)} 17:13, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Biographies of living persons

That page is not the appropriate spot for your article. By placing it there both the title is wrong & it will break redirects from other pages. Krj373^{*(talk), *(contrib)} 17:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Techguy91/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Techguy91, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Techguy91/sandbox

User:Techguy91/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Techguy91/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Techguy91/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Krj373^{*(talk), *(contrib)} 18:00, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Kundan Srivastava

Hi,

I created Article about Kundan Srivastava (http://www.kundansrivastava.com/news/) in sandbox here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Techguy91/sandbox Robert McClenon tried to move this sandbox to Draft: Kundan Srivastava, and was unable to do so. There have been two Miscellany for Deletion drafts of biographies of this individual, both of which resulted in deletion, and the title is now salted against re-creation. Please discuss this with the salting administrator, He Said.

May Draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kundan_Srivastava was deleted many times but i believe this article reliable sources are enough to publish.

IMP Sources - http://www.chron.com/news/nation-world/article/Scary-video-Indian-woman-beats-chokes-mother-in-6758996.php http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Shocking-video-of-woman-assaulting-mother-in-law-emerges-online/articleshow/50537993.cms

Google News Source - https://www.google.co.in/search?q=kundan+srivastava&rlz=1C1CHWA_enIN677IN677&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjboeLPvZPLAhUIGo4KHR_VDTgQ_AUIBygB

Please resolve the issue.

Thanks

This individual does not meet our notability guidelines. Please know there's a difference between receiving coverage directly, or being mentioned in coverage about another individual. I've looked through the sources and while it's commendable this individual has taken up this high profile case as part of their cause, it's not remotely close to meeting our individual notability requirements. Policies you should review and thoroughly understand are WP:BLP1E, WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO, and WP:INHERENT. Repeated attempts to have this article created by going to multiple places may be seen as disruption. Mkdw^talk 19:10, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

I strongly suggest you stop venue shopping at various different talk pages and project spaces to get the outcome you want. Draft:Kundan Srivastava was deleted FIVE times and eventually salted. You've now since re-created it in a different place. Your draft has been reviewed and it's currently up for deletion, again. A number of experienced editors have reviewed it and it's clear the individual does not meet the notability criteria for their own article. If you cannot drop the subject then you will likely be indefinitely blocked until you agree to not re-create or add any content to Wikipedia regarding this individual. Mkdw^talk 19:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Techguy91, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Techguy91! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Liz (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 18:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Techguy91/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Techguy91/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 16:41, 26 February 2016 (UTC)