Taties20
Welcome
edit
|
Speedy deletion of Dimitriy Tyapushkin
edit
A tag has been placed on Dimitriy Tyapushkin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 18:46, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
April 2009
edit
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Jan Schlaudraff. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 17:16, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi! Sorry, what's your source for these edits? Thank you! --necronudist (talk) 09:33, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Gautama Buddha
editI undid your change to Gautama Buddha. While there are certain days of the year that are recognized as being the precise birth or death dates of Siddhartha Gautama, they vary quite a bit between traditions, and often vary from year to year due to the way local calendars are calculated. None of these exact dates of the year are verifiable from textual or archaeological records. --Clay Collier (talk) 21:22, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
August 2009
edit Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jan Stejskal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 20:25, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
Villa squad numbers
edit Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Aston Villa F.C.. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Woody (talk) 18:20, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I was just wondering where you found Hazell's date of birth? Would be handy to reference it. Cheers, --Jimbo[online] 20:09, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
December 2009
edit Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rodolfo Cota, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. GiantSnowman 14:48, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Andrew Johnson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 17:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
edit Hello Taties20! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 876 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Mick Rose - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:28, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
March 2010
editHello. Not sure why you changed the infobox template name on Johnny Watts, which broke the infobox formatting? Also, I undid your addition of a date of death, because you didn't say where you got it from. The source already in the article reported his death on the 10th, but it doesn't say he died that day. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 08:52, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
April 2010
edit Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Teóphilo Bettencourt Pereira, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bento00 (talk) 17:03, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Heights
editHi there TATIES, VASCO from Portugal here,
Like you did in José Águas, please let the heights of players stay formatted, it's supposed to be that way. Please respect other people's work, the same will be done to yours.
Happy editing, nice week - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 16:13, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Sándor Gellér
editYou may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
The article Sándor Gellér has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:23, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Badiépa
edit A tag has been placed on Badiépa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Pichpich (talk) 19:36, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Johannes Christoffel van Mastenbroek
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Johannes Christoffel van Mastenbroek requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:30, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
source? --necronudist (talk) 15:05, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Tags and formatting
editHello. Please don't remove tags like {{BLP sources}} from articles without fixing the problems they're tagging, as you did at José Dominguez. And we're recommended to use the {{height}} or {{convert}} template for athletes' heights in infoboxes, to ensure that we're using standard consistent conversions from one measuring system to the other. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:41, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Chiquinho Carlos
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Chiquinho Carlos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:15, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with the page José Rita on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. LazyJob (talk) 07:25, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
The article Mick Rose is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mick Rose until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. EchetusXe 11:30, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Sources
editHello. Please understand that all information included in articles should be verifiable by reference to reliable published sources. This is particularly important in biographies of living persons. Please stop adding or changing dates of birth or death, places of birth or death, heights, etc, in biographical articles without at the same time adding a reference to the reliable published source from which you got the information. Thank you. Struway2 (talk) 12:24, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
December 2010
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Pat Van Den Hauwe, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The player's height according to the Soccerbase link in the article is 5 ft 11. Please don't make unsourced changes. Struway2 (talk) 21:44, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
- And again... I've undone your changes to dates of birth at 1930 FIFA World Cup squads and Pedro Benítez (goalkeeper) because you didn't add a source for your additions. In the case of Benítez, you changed his date of birth away from the date given on the FIFA website. Please stop making unsourced changes. Struway2 (talk) 22:17, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Dennis Gillespie. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Struway2 (talk) 20:34, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Robert Lainton
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Robert Lainton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Vrenator (talk) 13:24, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Jason Brown
editBrown was on loan for a month and has returned to Blackburn. Please stop re-adding him to the various articles. Thanks. Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:23, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
- Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Stop now. You are starting to edit-war, which may result in you being blocked. Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:35, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:39, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.
I don't know what part of "Brown has left Orient" you don't understand, or maybe you are trying to get blocked - here's a reference - [1]. Stop changing the articles. Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:52, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
January 2011
edit Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Emperor Ninmyō. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please stop changing dates of birth and death without sources. -- Joren (talk) 09:46, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Empress Kōken, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Judging by the comments on this talk page, you've been making unsourced changes to articles for many, many months. It's probably far too late to ask you again to stop, but this is a final warning. Struway2 (talk) 22:18, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
The article Didier Chambaron has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. jcgoble3 (talk) 21:04, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Didier Chambaron
edit You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
A tag has been placed on Didier Chambaron requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. —C.Fred (talk) 21:12, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 00:10, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Taties20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i have been missidenified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taties20 (talk • contribs) 11:13, 15 January 2011
Decline reason:
No attempt has been made to even address the reason for the block. Closedmouth (talk) 17:47, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I formatted the unblock request for you so it will be noticed by admins. jcgoble3 (talk) 17:39, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Taties20 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked for disruptive editing. I regret these edits
Decline reason:
This request does not include any information that would help me evaluate the likelihood that unblocking this account would lead to a better encyclopedia- it does not even demonstrate that you understand the reason for your block. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:13, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Speedy deletion nomination of Ayrton Moreira
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ayrton Moreira requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —KuyaBriBriTalk 14:47, 8 March 2011 (UTC)