Hi Tahamzd! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ivan Zaytsev (volleyball), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al-Arabi SC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edwin Benne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page World League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello Tahamzd,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kambiz Dirbaz for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Tahamzd. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Kambiz Dirbaz, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please don't add red-linked categories.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, Tahamzd. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adidas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ivan Zaytsev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Please add your sources to Brasil Vôlei Clube. It has 'external links' but this means 'suggestions for further reading' rather than sources used in the creation of the article. If these are actually your sources, please just change the heading and remove the unref tag. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 11:08, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello Tahamzd: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 11:09, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your referemces.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
You have now removed a refimprove tag from Supercoppa italiana, although it has an empty references section and only an external link, which means suggestion for further reading rather than source used in the creation of the article. You also left no edit summary. I then checked the edit history of this page - this is the fourth time you have removed the refimprove/unref tag, even though you have added no references and refused to respond to other editors' concerns raised on your talk page. You have done the same at Serie A1 (volleyball). This is not acceptable. Please respond; again WP:Communication is required. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 17:44, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Volley2002.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Hi Tahamzd, unfortunately I've had to block you indefinitely due to your complete refusal to communicate. Editors are repeatedly coming to you with problems with your editing, problems that are easily fixed, but it appears that you're either unable or unwilling to communicate in even a basic manner. Communication is required if you wish to edit here. Swarm♠23:56, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Tahamzd, deleting the above message is another example of why you have been blocked, and I've restored it as other editors need to be aware that you are unable to respond to add sources at the moment. Please think carefully, and then when you feel you have understood why the block has been put in place, put in an unblock request. Best of luck, Boleyn (talk) 19:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
You must have seen the deletion log entries, or else you would not have known that I had deleted the articles. Those log entries tell you why they were deleted.
And no, we do not restore editing done by editors who evade blocks by using sockpuppet accounts. If we did then there would be no disincentive to just creating more sockpuppets to evade the next block. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:37, 12 June 2018 (UTC)Reply