Welcome!

Hello, Silverline72! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Silverline72, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Silverline72! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ChamithN (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:16, 15 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

January 2015

edit

  You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Whitelight77. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 00:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hey Primefac Please note you commented about the quality of writing on a page you nominated for deletion. I added citations to the page and left a note in defense of it. Arguably, my writing style demonstrates a degree of higher education. Either I am not the same person who wrote the entry and, therefore, not a "sock puppet" OR I very cleverly created the page using a poor writing style under a different user name years before you decided to try to get it "blown up". What you have demonstrated with this specious accusation is bullying and ignorance, neither of which are defendable.

Silverline72, the fact that you feel I am doing this purely to be a bully, or that I am wilfully ignorant, is rather unfair. The SPI process requires a large amount of evidence, of which I have. None of the accounts under scrutiny were around when the article was originally written, and so I can surmise rather confidently that you are not one of the original writers. The reason that the SPI was created is because the article got put up for deletion, and within two days we had three brand-new accounts all editing it and trying to justify its inclusion. This is highly suspicious activity, and usually implies either a sockpuppet or a meatpuppet - hence the SPI. If you are indeed unconnected to the other accounts, the investigation will show that. I did not do this out of malice, spite, or a desire to see the article tanked, I'm just following a logical set of steps based on the rules set up by Wikipedia. If anything, I'm glad the article is receiving the attention it deserves, and I'm contemplating withdrawing the deletion nomination. Primefac (talk) 11:34, 17 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit