Your submission at Articles for creation: Byron Davis (April 17) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 20:45, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Shelly Took! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:45, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert dos Santos has been accepted edit

 
Robert dos Santos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cheers! Fakescientist8000 13:11, 8 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi Fakescientist
Thank you for confirming this article, I was beginning to wonder if I would ever get this right!
I have some quick questions if you have a moment. I am a film student with a passion for film in South Africa and looking to update wikipedia on this seeing as African knowledge is lacking.
Could you help me out on the following:
1) I had an article which was not accepted (boo) because it didn't seem to be relevant because it did not contain significant coverage. The person is well known here but that didn't seem to matter. So how do I overcome this for that and future pages? How many links do I need to have an article be accepted and be of significant coverage?
2) With the other article I might have gone overboard and grabbed every single link I could find. This seems to have gotten a stamp which says that the article is not from a neutral point of view because I wanted it to look authoritative. So for this, how do I make sure this doesn't happen again in the future and how do I make this and other articles more neutral? Should I get another person as a secondary source to assist or should I reword these things?
Thank you again for confirming this article and watch this space for more! Shelly Took (talk) 09:34, 10 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Saxon Logan for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saxon Logan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saxon Logan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

A loose necktie (talk) 19:14, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi guys, please let me know what I can do to make this article better. Not sure why this would be marked for deletion. The guy won an Emmy award. Seems like someone who should be noted. Please let me know what I can do to improve the article? Shelly Took (talk) 19:21, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Byron Davis edit

  Hello, Shelly Took. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Byron Davis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Byron Davis edit

 

Hello, Shelly Took. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Byron Davis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:51, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply