時間 moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, 時間, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 09:53, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

FitGirl Repacks and reliable sources

edit

I appreciate your attempt to add more information to FitGirl Repacks, as that article is quite short and could be improved. However, I've reverted your edits as the sources you cited are not considered reliable. Wikipedia relies on reliable sources so that people can trust article content, this importantly means that user-generated content such as web forums and self-published sources such as blogs are generally unacceptable. Elli (talk | contribs) 07:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: 時間 (February 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wgullyn was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Wgullyn (talk) 14:50, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, SenorMcChum! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wgullyn (talk) 14:50, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Makise Kurisu

edit

  Hello, SenorMcChum. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Makise Kurisu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:時間

edit

  Hello, SenorMcChum. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:時間, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:04, 4 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Makise Kurisu

edit
 

Hello, SenorMcChum. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Makise Kurisu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:02, 12 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nanahira for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nanahira is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nanahira until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 03:19, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, SenorMcChum

Thank you for creating Japan Cartoonists Association.

User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating this article on a notable organization.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 20:45, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Chokottodake

edit

Hello, SenorMcChum

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username JML1148, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Chokottodake, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|JML1148}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 22:01, 8 October 2022 (UTC)Reply