Saung Tadashi

Your submission at AfC Liénard–Chipart criterion was accepted

Liénard–Chipart criterion, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—Anne Delong (talk) 02:58, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Poker game "essentially weakly solved"

In regard to our discussion at Talk:Solved_game: I posted some of my thoughts on "essentially weakly solved" in this TwoPlusTwo forum thread. Some of the authors of the paper were posting in that thread, but they haven't yet replied to my post. --AndyBloch (talk) 08:12, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for the explanation :) Saung Tadashi (talk) 03:34, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Loewner order has been accepted

Loewner order, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FireflySixtySeven (talk) 19:35, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Arakelyan's theorem has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Arakelyan's theorem. Thanks! Oo7565 (talk) 09:27, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arakelyan's theorem has been accepted

Arakelyan's theorem, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 07:36, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Math notation

You should not indiscriminately put everything in non-TeX mathematical notation in italics. Thus:

right: M:c₀ × ... × c₀ → ℂ

wrong: M:c₀ × ... × c₀ → ℂ

The idea is to match TeX style, so those things that would appear in italics in TeX or LaTeX are italicized, including variables but not including digits or punctuation, and not including things like sin, det, log, exp, max, sup, etc.

Also, notice this:

right: |ƒ − g| < ε

wrong: |ƒ-g|<ε

• the absolute value signs should not be italicized;
• the minus sign should not be a stubby little hyphen but an actual minus sign;
• spacing precedes and follows the minus sign and the less-than sign.

This is all codified at WP:MOSMATH. Michael Hardy (talk) 22:59, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the advice. I will be more careful to follow WP:MOSMATH next time. Saung Tadashi (talk) 02:04, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Finsler's lemma has been accepted

Finsler's lemma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zanhe (talk) 19:03, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Saung Tadashi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Berek (talk) 08:20, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Japanese time bug

The Guardian newspaper has a couple of bits on this bug, which you seem to be work on Wikipedia page for. User:Saung Tadashi/Japanese calendar era bug

• https://www.theguardian.com/technology/audio/2019/jan/04/japan-emperor-akihito-new-y2k-millennium-bug-chips-with-everything-podcast - Chips with Everything- Japan's new Y2K
• https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/25/big-tech-warns-japan-millennium-bug-y2k-emperor-akihito-abdication - Big tech warns of 'Japan's millennium bug' ahead of Akihito's abdication

159753 (talk) 19:38, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

@159753: Thanks, I'll take a look! :) - Saung Tadashi (talk) 01:31, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Nonlinear control into Popov criterion. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:51, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

@Diannaa: thanks for the advice and for your edit. I'll take more care from now on. 😊 — Saung Tadashi (talk) 01:26, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Format and other things

I found this in Popov criterion:

${\begin{matrix}{\dot {x}}&=&Ax+bu\\{\dot {\xi }}&=&u\\y&=&cx+d\xi \end{matrix}}$

I changed it to this:

${\begin{aligned}{\dot {x}}&=Ax+bu\\{\dot {\xi }}&=u\\y&=cx+d\xi \end{aligned}}$

That is standard usage. Note also my other edits to that article. Michael Hardy (talk) 18:12, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

@Michael Hardy: Thank you for cleaning the article and teaching me. I always learn from your edits 🙂 — Saung Tadashi (talk) 01:22, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Inerter link

Hi, I found the link to Inerter at your User page in Articles I wish to improve/On control theory section... and I suppose you meant Inerter (mechanical networks). Have a good day. :) CiaPan (talk) 07:42, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

@CiaPan: Thanks for the notice! Have a good day and an excellent week 😁 — Saung Tadashi (talk) 12:33, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Final Value Theorem

You're very welcome. Thanks for noticing, and for your ongoing efforts as well. Spectrum629 (talk) 04:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Your addition to Positive systems has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:17, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

@Diannaa: Hi Diannaa, I wonder if there was a misunderstanding. As far I recall, I didn't added any copyrighted material to the page and every sentence that I added to the page was properly cited and weren't direct copies from the source texts. Could you point to me where I violated the copyright policy? Thanks! Saung Tadashi (talk) 14:27, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

@Diannaa: Thanks, I saw on the edit history. I thought I paraphrased this source, but I could have been carefulness. Saung Tadashi (talk) 00:22, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't receive your first ping because you misspelled my username. Here is a link to the bot report where you can get an idea of what the problem was. Click on the iThenticate link to see what the bot found.— Diannaa (talk) 11:37, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

@Diannaa: Thanks. The sentences that the bot accused are mathematical definitions, so I didn't think it would be counted as a copyright infringement. Anyway, I will be more careful in the next edits. Just to avoid slipping in this kind of mistake again, do you know if I can use the CopyPatrol bot on drafts in my user page? Thanks again! Saung Tadashi (talk) 05:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Copyright material is not allowed anywhere on Wikipedia, not even in sandboxes or drafts.— Diannaa (talk) 14:38, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mezase! Top Pro: Green ni Kakeru Yume

The article Mezase! Top Pro: Green ni Kakeru Yume has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

lack of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Waxworker (talk) 21:20, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mezase Top Pro Green ni Kakeru Yume box art.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mezase Top Pro Green ni Kakeru Yume box art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Halanay Inequality has been accepted

Halanay Inequality, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:50, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Structural Identifiability (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Structural Identifiability and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 14:11, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Saung Tadashi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 14:11, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Structural Identifiability has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Structural Identifiability. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 23:03, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello asilvering, I just wanted to express my gratitude for your enlightening feedback. Your input has been very helpful in improving the clarity of the text. After considering your suggestion, I have rewritten the Introduction and incorporated the definition of structural identifiability in the first sentence, which has made it much clearer. Saung Tadashi (talk) 10:48, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Structural identifiability has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Structural identifiability. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Structural identifiability has been accepted

Structural identifiability, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 19:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks Ozzie10aaaa :) Saung Tadashi (talk) 19:21, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 57

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 57, May – June 2023

• Suggestion improvements
• Favorite collections tips
• Spotlight: Promoting Nigerian Books and Authors

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 58

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 58, July – August 2023

• New partners - De Standaard and Duncker & Humblot
• Tech tip: Filters
• Wikimania presentation

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Saung Tadashi. Thank you for your work on Kreiss matrix theorem. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

@SunDawn: Thanks for the appreciation! May God bless you and your family! Saung Tadashi (talk) 18:23, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 59

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 59, September – October 2023

• Spotlight: Introducing a repository of anti-disinformation projects
• Tech tip: Library access methods

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 60

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 60, November – December 2023

• Three new partners
• Google Scholar integration
• How to track partner suggestions

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 61

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 61, January – February 2024

• Bristol University Press and British Online Archives now available
• 1Lib1Ref results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 62

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 62, March – April 2024

• IEEE and Haaretz now available
• Let's Connect Clinics about The Wikipedia Library
• Spotlight and Wikipedia Library tips

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)