RishabhCine
Welcome!
|
May 2015 edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tanu Weds Manu Returns has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tanu Weds Manu Returns was changed by RishabhCine (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886886 on 2015-05-04T08:09:41+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:09, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Misbehaving with user and giving wrong information edit
User:Krimuk90 You are misbehaving with the users of wikipedia and sending wrong information. You have to face some problem. Complaining to wikipedia about your behaviour. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RishabhCine (talk • contribs) 10:37, 4 May 2015
RishabhCine, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi RishabhCine! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Lightbreather (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:31, 4 May 2015 (UTC) |
Complain have been registered regarding you misbehaving edit
User:Krimuk90 You are trying to add unwanted links in refrence and external. Please co-operate with Wikipedia and try to edit some article and do not spam Wikipedia. A complain regarding your behaviour has been filed. More activity Regarding this can block your link from wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RishabhCine (talk • contribs) 01:34, 5 May 2015
If you are associated in any way with that website then you should not be adding links to it in articles. And certainly not edit warring so massively over a reference. Work it out with the other editor, or leave the reference I added, which supports the same information without coming across as spam. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:35, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Its not a spam cine report just added this news first on the whole web. So I added this then why are you adding ibtimes. Even ibtimes added the trailer after 1 hour of cinereport. I request you to add the cinereport link again as the other person was doing the spamming — Preceding unsigned comment added by RishabhCine (talk • contribs) 14:46, 5 May 2015
- That's a ridiculous claim at best, and this is a reference in the end. Quite frankly you seem to be adding links to that website all over the place, and I question your claim of no association given your username. Any reliable source will serve, and it's neutral considering you and the other editor have been edit warring consistently for days over it instead of discussing it, which is why the article is fully protected. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:52, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for my words but don't be angry I am agree with you for sure. I believe that the best refrence should be added/ Till now I will add only the suitable refrences. Thanks --RishabhCine (talk) 18:55, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
May 2015 edit
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at User talk:RishabhCine, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 18:49, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
File source problem with File:ABCD 2 poster.jpeg edit
Thank you for uploading File:ABCD 2 poster.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. QuiteUnusual (talk) 11:35, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
May 2015 edit
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. You are adding links to cinereport that are purely WP:REFSPAM and there only to promote that website. Nearly all of your edits are to add links to that website, leading to concerns about a WP:COI from you promoting that website. Please stop. Ravensfire (talk) 18:05, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
I understood what you are telling from now I will add only appropriate information and links --RishabhCine (talk) 18:17, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Tanu Weds Manu Returns, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Krimuk|90 (talk) 13:58, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:18, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
RishabhCine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am new here and I dont know the complete policy. Now i will real all the regulation before the edits. RishabhCine (talk) 10:42, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Good to hear. Please read the applicable policy and let us know what you think you did wrong, and how you will address the problem. Kuru (talk) 11:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
RishabhCine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have added some link and that causes promotion and I assure Wikipedia that I will not do anything like this again and help Wikipedia by giving my best RishabhCine (talk) 15:10, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I had a look your edits, and tried to come up with a proposal that I could unblock you in exchange for you not promising not to do something. Unfortunately, your pattern of edits seems to be too problematic. Adding links to promote a site was not the only problem, you were also edit-warring at Hamari Adhuri Kahani. It seems that you're simply a bad fit for Wikipedia at this time. Perhaps you might have more success on a version of Wikipedia in another language? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:40, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
RishabhCine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I already accepted my mistake for hamari Adhuri Kahani and never added any bad links. And giving a chance to a new user is not bad. Just one chance and I will never ever do spaming again. I will never do anything wrong. Please Its a request don't block me. RishabhCine (talk) 17:11, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Under the circumstances, a Standard Offer approach could be taken in your case. PhilKnight (talk) 19:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
RishabhCine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Yes I am agree that I have done spamming and I also make Wikipedia believe that I will not do this again as I am new user I dont know the policies but now I read the terms and conditions and I only help in growth of Wikipedia. Please this time understand me. RishabhCine (talk) 18:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
It has been suggested that you take the standard offer. Do you accept this? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 19:46, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
RishabhCine (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
YesI accept. I will Wait six months, without sockpuppetry or block evasion. I Promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban. I will not create any extraordinary reasons to object to a return. RishabhCine (talk) 19:52, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Good to hear. Closing this for now. PhilKnight (talk) 21:51, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
June 2015 edit
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RishabhCine. Thank you.--Krimuk|90 (talk) 17:11, 20 June 2015 (UTC)