Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Susan Ershler. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. My76Strat (talk) 02:38, 27 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello Reliablecyber. I have reviewed the above article and will publish the article within the next 24 hours. I wanted to give you this time, and more if you like, to improve the article enough to withstand a start class evaluation. I think the article is a great candidate for WP:DYK and would make the nomination. The issue is, yours would be nominated as a new article, and these can be no older than 5 days. That is from the date of creation, so I am allowing this time to consider making the improvements necessary to bolster the articles chance at success in the DYK nomination process. I also will post to this page some information which can be helpful in these regards, and others. Cheers. My76Strat (talk) 02:56, 27 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Welcome and introduction

edit

Hi, Reliablecyber. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get started. Best of luck! My76Strat (talk) 02:57, 27 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
ようこそ
  • You don't need to read anything - anybody can edit; just go to an article and edit it. Be Bold, but please don't put silly stuff in - it will be removed very quickly, and will annoy people.
  • Ask for help. Talk to us live, or edit this page, put {{helpme}} and describe what help you need. Someone will reply very quickly - usually within a few minutes.
  • Edit existing articles, before you make your own. Look at some subjects that you know about, and see if you can make them a bit better. For example, Wikipedia:Cleanup#2009.
  • When you're ready, read about Your first article. It should be about something well-known, and it will need references.

Good luck with editing; please drop me a line some time on my own talk page.

There's lots of information below. Once again, welcome to the fantastic world of Wikipedia!

--My76Strat (talk) 02:57, 27 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 

Susan Ershler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

  • The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
  • Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
  • If you would to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! My76Strat (talk) 05:28, 29 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Holy cow, not that I have anything to add to the article, but, I was just perusing the DYK nomination, and surprised that Susan would be the first of a married couple to reach the summit of Everest, so I started mentally checking through the list of people I've climbed with, and the third person on my list was Phil Ershler. He wasn't married AFAIK, when I climbed Denali with him. Congratulations to both of them. (on the merits, I'll be surprised if they are the first to climb Everest, but Seven Summits sounds plausible.)--SPhilbrickT 19:57, 30 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Susan Ershler

edit

RlevseTalk 00:02, 8 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Susan Ershler.jpg

edit

The file needs to have permission via OTRS because files of living people need to be free-use almost all of the time. You can find out more about how to file for permission at Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. If you need further help, Wikipedia:Media copyright questions should be able to answer any questions. Thanks, We hope (talk) 23:55, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Susan Ershler Professional Headshot.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Susan Ershler Professional Headshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. We hope (talk) 23:59, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Susan_Ershler.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Susan_Ershler.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 12:52, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Imaging instructions

edit

To use a picture on Wikipedia, we need permission from whoever owns it.

  • If it is your OWN picture - then you can just upload it yourself, at "Commons", saying "It is entirely my own work" - at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Upload .
  • If it is NOT YOURS, then the owner can give permission in two ways;
  • A) They could put it on a website (flickr, or their own site) with an appropriate licence, such as "Public Domain" or "Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike" (that is an option in flickr)
  • B) They could email us permission. You could ask them to do that, by sending them an email saying something like "Hi, I've written a page on Wikipedia, and I'd really like to add a picture - but as Wikipedia is FREE, we can only use freely-licenced pictures. If you have any which you can give permission for, please send me an email back with the text below, and the picture(s) attached."

-Then add a copy of this: http://enwp.org/user:chzz/help/myboilerplate (having filled the form out)
-And send the email (attached picture file + completed form) to: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org
Hope this helps, Shearonink (talk) 23:05, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Reliablecyber. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Susan Ershler ‎, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 19:39, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply