Hello, Rebecca brennan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Kimse (talk) 02:25, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous


Fair use logos edit

Hello Rebecca. To familiarize yourself with English Wikipedia, please read the WELCOME INFORMATION above - it should give you lots of valuable information. Regarding uploading images - English Wikipedia accepts freely licensed media, i.e. you can upload a picture that you've created and license it under a free license. However, this Wikipedia also accepts non-free images, but they have to be licensed as such and non-free use rationale has to be included with it.

For this particular image I've used Template:Logo fur to describe why the image should be hosted on Wikipedia server (why it's important), its source and any other relevant information. Also, I've included Template:Non-free logo to indicate that this picture is not free for anyone to use.

Please let me know if you need more information, I'll try to help you out. --Kimse (talk) 02:25, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Request for help edit

I contributed a page called Healthy Kids School Canteen Association and it has been marked by several admin as needing additional citation and wikifying, and they gave me several links for that, but the thing is I don't know which specific part of the article need this and how to pass the general notability guideline specifically for my article, because the link that they gave me is very general. Please help me show which part of the article that needs attention and what needs to be done to that part..--Rebecca brennan (talk) 04:13, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

You've done very well for a first timer, so congratulations on that. The best and cleanest way to meet the notability guidelines is to show that the subject has received significant coverage in 3rd party sources. Most of the references in the article come from Healthy Kids SCA - has the Association received any kind of media coverage (newspaper, magazine, government publication etc)?--Kubigula (talk) 04:28, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
P.S. The normal convention around here is to add new talk page comments to the bottom - I know it's a bit counterintuitive. I have taken the liberty of moving this discussion to the bottom.

{{helpme}} Thanks for replying my request Kubigula. I have added a section called Collaboration on the Healthy Kids SCA Wikipage, whose source is not from Healthy Kids SCA Website, will that be enough to pass the notability guidelines?--Rebecca brennan (talk) 04:33, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

No actually, they need to be third party links, that means they cannot be written by you (not judging), or the website itself. It needs to be third party links. BoL (Talk) 04:45, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
The www.educating.co.nz link is a step in the right direction. To be safer, I'd say the article needs news or journal coverage. The good news is that nobody is seriously challenging or pressing for the deletion of the page. Ultimately, if there is a challenge, the community of editors makes the decision. I'll take a longer look at the article tomorrow and try to wikify it a bit more.--Kubigula (talk) 04:52, 3 September 2008 (UTC) (by the way, you don't need {{helpme}} anymore; I'll keep this page on my watchlist while we work this out).Reply

Thank you so much Kubigula, for re-writing my article and wikifying them. Is there anything else I can do or add so that I can meet the general notability guidelines? --Rebecca brennan (talk) 04:44, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome - it's the Wiki way. As for the article, I did find a magazine article online that I will incorporate into the article. That should bolster the argument for meeting the GNG. Other than that, it would help if you can find one more news source - online or in print - that discusses the group. If not, I think there is probably enough already that the article is safe.--Kubigula (talk) 04:13, 6 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of Interest? edit

  If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Healthy Kids School Canteen Association, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Your username matches the Rebecca Brennan who is the Communications Officer for the Healthy Kids School Canteen Association [1]. If you think that you can edit without a COI, please delete this section and note as such on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Healthy Kids School Canteen Association. —C45207 | Talk 23:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Healthy Kids School Canteen Association edit

 

The article Healthy Kids School Canteen Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be notable at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 02:22, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Healthy Kids School Canteen Association for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Healthy Kids School Canteen Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Healthy Kids School Canteen Association (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 02:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply