March 2019 edit

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 21:49, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Landlubber Jeans (July 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 19:41, 15 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Rbiweb! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 19:41, 15 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Landlubber Jeans (August 2) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RoySmith were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- RoySmith (talk) 13:30, 2 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

August 2019 edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at WP:Teahouse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button   located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 19:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Landlubber Jeans (August 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MJL was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MJLTalk 18:57, 3 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Landlubber Jeans has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Landlubber Jeans. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:17, 4 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived edit

 

Hi Rbiweb! You created a thread called Landlubber Clothing Rejected at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


Your submission at Articles for creation: Landlubber Jeans (September 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:11, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Draft:Landlubber Jeans edit

  Draft:Landlubber Jeans, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Landlubber Jeans and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Landlubber Jeans during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:23, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Landlubber Jeans has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Landlubber Jeans. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:15, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Landlubber Jeans (October 23) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft reads like an advertisement, but Wikipedia is not for advertising.

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the company.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:18, 23 October 2019 (UTC)Reply