Your submission at Articles for creation: Keith Kopka (July 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AngusWđŸ¶đŸ¶F (bark ‱ sniff) 17:27, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, RIpoRI! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWđŸ¶đŸ¶F (bark ‱ sniff) 17:27, 21 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keith Kopka (December 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 09:55, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keith Kopka (December 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Crunchydillpickle was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Hello, I did a search and found insufficient media coverage of Keith Kopka, so I unfortunately have to decline. Feel free to read WP:NBIO for more on Wikipedia's notability standards. I appreciate your work to improve the sourcing, but ultimately this bio is suited for a personal website or blog. I recommend you wait to resubmit until the subject gets additional press coverage. Leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions!
CrunchydillpickleđŸ„’ (talk) 17:01, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Keith Kopka

edit

  Hello, RIpoRI. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Keith Kopka, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Keith Kopka

edit
 

Hello, RIpoRI. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Keith Kopka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:34, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply