Hello, PvanJaarsveld, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! – Pgallert (talk) 15:32, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Hi PvanJaarsveld! I have undone your change to Namibia for now, as it introduced an inconsistency with the article Allgemeine Zeitung. However, the source given in the Namibia article is offline... if you have a better source or if the article's information is wrong, please don't hesitate to contact me.

I have seen that you unlinked other articles. Red links are not a bug on Wikipedia, they are a feature, showing what articles have yet to be written. On the Wikipedia app, however, they do not appear in red but in blue, and they are more annoying than useful. Cheers, Pgallert (talk) 15:28, 10 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

PvanJaarsveld, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi PvanJaarsveld! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit

Nomination of CHAK89 for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CHAK89 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CHAK89 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 12:44, 20 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of CHAK89

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CHAK89, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Störm (talk) 17:11, 20 February 2018 (UTC)Reply