Pricegeorge212
Pricegeorge212, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi Pricegeorge212! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 6 October 2020 (UTC) |
Let's hope you can make useful contributions
editI can understand your frustrations because of Covid. However, if you continue to make contributions like "this first one". you will have your account blocked for, amongst other things, being WP:NOTHERE. Michael D. Turnbull (talk) 16:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- I concur on both counts. I'm probably violating a Wikipedia rule or three by even continuing this "not here" topic, but I will say that at least in most medium sized and larger cities in the United States, there are professional counselors available. In larger cities, there are charities that can refer you to counselors who will charge based on your ability to pay. It's best to stop here, I don't want to get myself - or you if you reply - into any more trouble for violating Wikipedia's rules. After all, we are here to build an encyclopedia, not socialize or commiserate over the current state of the planet. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:12, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Metrodome Distribution (October 7)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Metrodome Distribution and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Metrodome Distribution, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
November 2020
editHello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Luciano Pavarotti, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop adding "death controversies" categories to articles --such as this one -- where the death was *not* controversial. ZimZalaBim talk 19:43, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
editHi Pricegeorge212! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Film categories
editHi. Please see this discussion at WT:FILM. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:46, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Death controversies
editA tag has been placed on Category:Death controversies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
November 2020
editHello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to User:Lugnuts/Sandbox, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.
I am at a loss as to what you were trying to achieve by making comments at another user's sandbox and then submitting it for review. To contact another editor, use their talk page and if you have concerns about a specific article use the article talk page to start a discussion. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 17:12, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at 2020 Cannes Film Festival, you may be blocked from editing. Your edit summary reveals your desire to add this category reflects your personal opinion, not that there is a citation that supports it was a controversial year for Cannes ZimZalaBim talk 17:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Please stop editing in my sandbox, and don't use edit summaries like this. Please see this discussion about the category you keep adding. If you think it should go on the Cannes article, please can you at least take part in that discussion? Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:47, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Pricegeorge212: Wikipedia is not therapy, but we all had a bad year. I can't speak for others, but off-Wiki/in-real-life I've had to "bite my tongue" out of politeness way more than once this very bad [those are the polite words for what I am really thinking] year. I just have to remember to be thankful that I'm still around to
complain about iter I mean the thankful that next year will be better. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 🎄 14:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Pricegeorge212: Wikipedia is not therapy, but we all had a bad year. I can't speak for others, but off-Wiki/in-real-life I've had to "bite my tongue" out of politeness way more than once this very bad [those are the polite words for what I am really thinking] year. I just have to remember to be thankful that I'm still around to
December 2020
editPlease stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Suburbicon, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:41, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Myk Friedman
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Myk Friedman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Setreis (talk) 13:22, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Category:Animated films directed by Live-action filmmakers has been nominated for deletion
editCategory:Animated films directed by Live-action filmmakers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 02:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
February 2021
editYou may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 Cannes Film Festival. BOVINEBOY2008 22:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Metrodome Distribution
editHello, Pricegeorge212. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Metrodome Distribution, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Metrodome Distribution
editHello, Pricegeorge212. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Metrodome Distribution".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:06, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Daniel Kyre
editHello, Pricegeorge212. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daniel Kyre, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editYour draft article, Draft:Daniel Kyre
editHello, Pricegeorge212. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Daniel Kyre".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:58, 8 December 2021 (UTC)