Pranveer786, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Pranveer786! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nivedita Singh Chandel (August 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CAPTAIN RAJU was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:07, 14 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pranveer98 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Pranveer98 (talk) 17:51, 26 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pranveer98 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Pranveer98 (talk) 17:53, 26 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nivedita Singh Chandel (September 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Praxidicae (talk) 11:31, 5 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: NSG (September 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Theroadislong (talk) 11:44, 5 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
106.213.198.173 (talk) 08:17, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

106.213.198.173 (talk) 08:17, 6 September 2019 (UTC) Nivedita Chandel, all paid publicity and stunts. She already has an article which there are many who are in the line to be exposed.Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
106.213.192.123 (talk) 10:22, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

van

Your submission at Articles for creation - ESYTESINC

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Esytesinc (talk) 14:14, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Shree Saini

edit

Hi Pranveer786 :-)

1) You are free to remove any sections from this talk page after you have read. This may make it easier to navigate.

2) About Shree Saini, context is missing. Has this person been recognized outside of her household? If so, how?

To reply, please click 'edit' next to this section heading, and add your response at the end. Thank you!

Regards, --Gryllida (talk) 01:45, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Reply


hi Gryllida Shree Saini from the USA crowned Miss India Worldwide 2018. Indian-American Shree Saini has been crowned Miss India Worldwide 2018 at a pageant held in the Fords City of New Jersey. Shree Saini is an American actress, She was also crowned Miss India USA 2017, Her family relocated to United States when Shree Saini was just 5 years old. At the age of twelve, she overcame a heart ailment which required her to use a pacemaker. This girl, despite being a heart patient at a very young age, took part in a beauty pageant and achieved it, she proved that sickness cannot be used as an excuse to achieve any success, she made her country's name famous all over the world. In. If seen, Wikipedia is for those people who are famous for some reason or have illuminated the name of their country, Mr. Saini has also got fame by illuminating the name of his country which would be difficult for ordinary girls. Pranveer786 (talk) 10:53, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nivedita Singh Chandel (September 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 07:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nivedita Singh Chandel (September 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:24, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
223.189.27.108 (talk) 15:32, 1 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

It's a paid article. Not a notable person. Try as much you can buddy! Please do ensure you pass on this word to her. She'll be rejected. If ever accepted, then ask her to keep her linen clean.

She might even end up leaving you high and dry.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shree Saini (October 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:11, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Dear Sir, I have been blocked by the plot, please unblock me.

edit

When I opened my work after a long time, I was blocked. I am always trapped. I am an honest person. Wikipedia has hurt my honor, for which I will plead in the Indian court because I am completely innocent. I have been insulted by Wikipedia by associating my name with the wrong person. The page should investigate this matter soon. And these things hurt my honor and mentally torture me. Therefore, if the matter is not taken by Wikipedia, I will take recourse to the court. Pranveer786 (talk) 05:06, 19 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

It was deliberately implicated by linking the name with the wrong person.

edit

You are blocking an honest person like me by applying sockpuppeteer code. I ask Wikipedia to check my account and punish me if I am found wrong. I allege that I am being implicated, please investigate this matter. And block the culprit's account. I am not guilty yet I was harassed. You people have misbehaved with me, I want justice. I urge Wikipedia to have an honest editor investigate this matter. And Please unblock me. Pranveer786 (talk) 05:21, 19 July 2020 (UTC)Reply