User talk:Physeters//Archives/2022

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Physeters! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Writing an article
• Five pillars of Wikipedia
• Community portal
• Help pages
• The Teahouse (newcomer help)
• Main help desk

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Kj cheetham (talk) 13:45, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

@Kj cheetham Thanks! Physeters (talk) 14:27, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Question

I notice you have a fancy signature (which looks cool). But I'm wondering-- do you have a way of typing in four tildes (four of these-- "~") to make your fancy signature then automatically appear?

Or do you have another short-cut way to do it?

Or do you have to always cut and paste in the code for your fancy signature each time?

Thanks in advance for any tips. Appreciatively.

Chesapeake77 ^{>>> ♥ Truth}

Hi @Chesapeake77! I do have a way of adding my signature by typing four tildes. The way to change it from the automatic signature is very simple. What you need to do is, navigate to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences, and scroll down until you see "Signature". Copy your signature's html code into the text box and check "Treat the above as wiki markup" and then press save. This will make your tilde signature the custom signature you've designed as long as it 255 characters or shorter (yours is 215 characters in length, so in theory, you could add even more to you signature if you like). By the way, I think your signature looks very nice! Physeters^✉

Pinging @Chesapeake77--Physeters^✉ 17:32, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Oh, and I forgot, if you want the signature to show up on other wikimedia websites, you have to update your signature in the same manner as laid out above on each website. So for example, if you wanted to update it on Wikimedia Commons, you would go to https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences and do the same as instructed above for Wikipedia. Physeters^✉ 17:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks so very much for taking the time to explain this! :)

And thanks for the compliment on my sig!

I hope it's OK that I copied all of this to my Sandbox, just in case you want to clear things off over here at some point.

Most appreciatively,

Chesapeake77 ^{>>> ♥ Truth}

Pinging @Physeters Chesapeake77 (talk) 05:46, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

@Chesapeake77 You are very welcome. It is perfectly fine to keep a copy of this correspondence, though I don't intend to blank this section any time soon. Please let me know when you get it all working! Physeters^✉ 06:50, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Kathy Barnette has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kathy Barnette. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kathy Barnette (May 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathy Barnette.

This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission. If this draft is resubmitted, or an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection, a topic-ban or a partial block may be requested against the submitting editor, and the draft may be nominated for deletion.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Physeters! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kathy Barnette has been accepted

Kathy Barnette, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:35, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lillian DeBaptiste has been accepted

Lillian DeBaptiste, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dege31 (talk) 10:00, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Talk page etiquette

Just an FYI, but it is generally best practice to strike out your comments once they are outdated or if you are correcting an error once anyone has commented in reply. The change you made at the Vex/Heraldry Wikiproject isn't problematic, but it can cause unnecessary drama at more contentious forums. BTW, my suggestion still stands: you have a physical flag; that should be your lodestar in vectorizing. VanIsaac, MPLL ^cont_WpWS 03:42, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice @Vanisaac. I will strike out outdated comments going forward. As to which flag to use, I am going to give it a couple of more days to see where consensus falls, but more likely than not, I will end up going with your suggestion. Physeters^✉ 05:13, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	For your continued contributions and work on the image 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.svg, Thank you! 😃 Johnson524 (talk) 02:27, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

@Johnson524 Thank you so much! Physeters^✉ 14:18, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

@Physeters Thank YOU! -- Johnson524 (talk) 23:31, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Could you please create a map like you did for the occupied territories of Kyiv and Kharkiv Oblasts?

Could you please create a map like you did for the occupied territories of Kyiv and Kharkiv Oblasts, just as you did with the other occupation pages? Danielg532 (talk) 22:06, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

If I understand correctly, you want me to make .svg occupation maps for Kyiv and Kharkiv Oblasts? I'll get to work on them if this is what you want. Physeters^✉ 22:13, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

pinging @Danielg532 Physeters^✉ 22:31, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

@Danielg532 Here is a map of Kharkiv Oblast. Someone else has already made one for Kyiv Oblast.

Russian Occupation of Kharkiv Oblast

Russian Occupation of Kyiv Oblast

Physeters^✉ 05:26, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! Looks great! Danielg532 (talk) 11:07, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

You're welcome! Physeters^✉ 17:59, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Could you please make a map for the Mykolaiv Oblast Occupation

Hello, sorry to bother you again but could you please create another map for the occupation of the Mykolaiv Oblast with Pervomaiske and Novopetrivka since they are the 2nd and 3rd most populous areas in the occupation authority? Thanks! Danielg532 (talk) 23:43, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

@Danielg532 I'll just add them to the current Mykolaiv map. Physeters^✉ 00:17, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

 Partly done I've added Novopetrivka. However, Pervomaiske appears to be under Ukrainian control, not Russian.

Russian Occupation of Mykolaiv Oblast

Physeters^✉ 00:48, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

pinging @Danielg532 Physeters^✉ 00:50, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Oh thank you. That's odd since it shows it under control of Russians on the control of cities page Danielg532 (talk) 11:14, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Edit to Module:Russo-Ukrainian War detailed map

Could you please check your last edit to Module:Russo-Ukrainian War detailed map. I have no idea what "seconudaryModules" would do, but I wonder if it is a typo. Thanks. Nurg (talk) 21:47, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Yep, that's definitely a typo. I accidentally typed something in that line and I guess I didn't fully clear it. I apologize and hope it didn't break anything. Thanks for the heads up @Nurg. Physeters^✉ 23:40, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clifford DeBaptiste has been accepted

Clifford DeBaptiste, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 20:08, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the w3c fixes!

Hey Physeters, I just wanted to say thanks for fixing (just about) all of the w3c errors on the Russian Invasion of Ukraine map, as there was a quite lot of them for quite a long time. That's it 🙂 Johnson524 (Talk!) 15:18, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

You are very welcome! :) Physeters^✉ 18:50, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thanks for your contributions... Keep it going! Volten001 ☎ 04:24, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

@Volten001 Thank you so much! I really appreciate it! Physeters^✉ 05:30, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

No problem.. Glad you like it. Happy editing! Volten001 ^☎ 14:44, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chester County Hospital (December 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Blaze Wolf was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chester County Hospital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:16, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chester County Hospital has been accepted

Chester County Hospital, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 20:05, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Edit to Module:Russo-Ukrainian War detailed map

Russian vessels according to their news have already completely taken the Luhansk region. Well, you have already understood the hint?))) 46.138.11.160 (talk) 15:14, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

I'm not quite sure I understand what you're trying to say, but that is probably because of poor translation. As far as I know, Russian forces control around 99% of Luhansk Oblast, with Ukraine controlling a few small villages along the border with Donetsk & Kharkiv Oblasts. Russia has advanced around Kreminna in the past couple of days. Is that what you are referring to, or are you trying to say that since the Russian media says that they have full control of Luhansk, that it must be true/false? Physeters^✉ 19:01, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

practically yes, the whole Luhansk region Arabik4892 (talk) 20:28, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Also, if you're asking for a change to the module, you should describe your changes in detail and place an edit request at Talk:Territorial control during the Russo-Ukrainian War. Physeters^✉ 19:15, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

ok, did (with proof). Arabik4892 (talk) 20:28, 14 December 2022 (UTC)