User talk:Omirocksthisworld/Archive 1

Welcome

Hello, Omirocksthisworld! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Scientizzle 04:13, 17 December 2007 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

File:Divine Signs (HA).png

You put a invalid license on File:Divine Signs (HA).png. Only for use in Wikipedia is not a license we can accept here. It may be possible to justify the image under fair use, as long as write about the poster, not just the concept the poster illustrates. But you will need a fair use rationale. The same applies to the other posters. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:45, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

---

Okay thanks for the info. (Omirocksthisworld (talk) 23:34, 4 October 2009 (UTC))

Younus AlGohar

Hi, I've moved Younus algohar to Younus AlGohar ϢereSpielChequers 12:37, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:MFIatIranianEmbassy.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MFIatIranianEmbassy.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:17, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. I have reduced the resolution of the image and added more information about why I think its suitable to keep. (Omirocksthisworld (talk) 01:17, 2 January 2010 (UTC))

Edit War!!!

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

• You don't belong to His Holiness Gohar Shahi, you dirty soul belongs to younas harami & Let me tell you that you are not working for the cause of His Holiness, but you are a group of opportunists. Don't mess up with us, otherwise we would open your reality to all.--116.71.2.18 (talk) 07:00, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
• I hope you understand that in Wikipedia, we assume good faith with other editors, and do not automatically become hostile with other editors. Please understand that no edits done by myself to any of the Younus AlGohar, Messiah Foundation International or Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi articles were done as a personal attack. They are rather what I perceived to be constructive edits. I was merely pointing out to you editing this article to include"Son of a ......" as part of said person's name is vandalism. If you wish to add information or have any other objections, I would advise you to discuss it in the talk pages. Thanks for your cooperation. (Omirocksthisworld (talk) 07:34, 11 January 2010 (UTC))

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

• I've blocked one IP for a week for edit warring, the other has been warned re personal attacks and appropriate edit summaries. Mjroots (talk) 07:55, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

• I've semi-protected both articles without the NPOV tag. If the edit war continues it will be met with by longer periods of protection and longer blocks for the IPs. I've asked that any issues be raised on the relevant talk pages. Mjroots (talk) 15:32, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:47, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Sorry I always forget about that. I'll try to remember from now on. (Omirocksthisworld (talk) 07:18, 13 January 2010 (UTC))

January 2010: Sufism

There is an ongoing edit war in the article Sufism in the Sufi Sheikhs -> Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi sub-section of the article. Could we please discuss this issue on the talk page? See Wikipedia:Edit war. Thanks. Esowteric+Talk 10:35, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

• Once again, please at the very least, attempt to be cooperative in improving the articles instead of re-pasting the same edit summary with every revert, as you have done here and here and here. Please stop the vandalism, and instead discuss why you believe the changes need to be made on the talk pages. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.71.15.61 (talk) 08:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Is there a reason for re-posting my own notice to you? (Omirocksthisworld (talk) 09:24, 27 January 2010 (UTC))

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 08:16, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing it to the attention of those who can help. (Omirocksthisworld (talk) 09:22, 27 January 2010 (UTC))

Minor edits

"A check to the minor edit box signifies that only superficial differences exist between the current and previous versions: typographical corrections, formatting and presentational changes, rearrangement of text without modification of content, etc. A minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. An edit of this kind is marked in its page's revision history with a lower case, bolded "m" character (m)." Could you please be sure that you follow this guidelines? Odd, you're the 2nd person in about 5 minutes where I've posted this. Maybe it's catching? :-) Dougweller (talk) 08:53, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Blocked for edit warring

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at Messiah Foundation International. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. NJA (t/c) 09:25, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Omirocksthisworld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Although I understand that in recent days I have been involved in edit wars with IP addresses, I have tried with the IP addresses to first reach an agreement (see Talk: Messiah Foundation International and Talk: Younus AlGohar), however they have proved unresponsive to my attempts to explain my reverts and have instead ignored my requests for discussion. I feel that I should not be blocked from editing, as I have tried to assume good faith with the editors and reason with them.

Decline reason:

The correct thing to do when dealing with an IP user who will not listen is to report them here or ask that pages be protected, not continue the edit war with them. There are a lot of people hiding behind IPs who don't care for verifiability, only their Truth™, and while I wholly sympathize with you, I'm just not finding enough here to unblock. I'm sorry. —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Boribori!)} 09:43, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I did see your belated attempts, such as this to use talk pages for discussion. However you must really do this much earlier on, and well before you're in danger of breaching policy. In the last day alone, you've reverted at least 17 times on the article. You must not revert more than 3 times in 24 hours on a single article, nor demonstrate a pattern of reverts that is disruptive (see WP:EW). While you feel as though your intentions were correct, obviously so did the other party. All both of you had done is cause disruption, and you're blocked to prevent further disruption.

In future, you should attempt page discussion earlier on, and if that's unsuccessful then follow the steps at WP:DR, but never edit war as it's silly and disruptive. Also, you might have considered requesting page protection at WP:RFPP for genuine disputes. NJA (t/c) 09:40, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your response...I'm sorry, I realize I should have paid more attention the dispute resolution steps. I assure you that from now on I will follow the steps more vigilantly, and will most certainly make appeals for page protection, as this seems like the only way to stop the random removal of cited information and the like. It, however, looks as if I cannot comment on that page to appeal for page protection. But anyway, thank you for dealing with this mess, I haven't made it easy for you to see the reasons for dispute with all my reverts. (Omirocksthisworld (talk) 09:46, 27 January 2010 (UTC))

I just took a look at the page to see if I thought it needed protection and it has already been protected. Dougweller (talk) 11:03, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Wow, that was quick! (Omirocksthisworld (talk) 11:09, 27 January 2010 (UTC))

Block reduction

From our correspondence you seem to grasp the reasoning for the block, particularly how best to approach situations where you find yourself in a dispute that has lead or appears to be leading to an edit war. Due to this, and due to the fact that the articles have been protected to allow for discussion and the formation of consensus, I'm reducing your block from the original 31 hours to 12 hours (as you do have two technical violations of 3RR in the last day). Note that the IP user is still blocked for the initial 31 hours, thus you will need to allow time for them to join in on any discussions. Cheers, NJA (t/c) 11:19, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for being patient with me :), and of course, I will discuss the articles and issues relating to them with the IP as soon as my block is over. (Omirocksthisworld (talk) 11:21, 27 January 2010 (UTC))

I was involved in the reduction, please don't let me down. And note what I said about about marking edits as minor. Dougweller (talk) 13:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for giving me the chance then :)! And I'll try not to make edits in such a hurry- that way I'll take time to decide if the edit I'm making is minor or not. Thanks again! (Omirocksthisworld (talk) 21:05, 27 January 2010 (UTC))

Comments by User: 119.160.18.209

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on RAGS International. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.

• • On a condition that you would not delete anything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.160.18.209 (talk) 09:43, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

You have no authority to be issuing ultimatums. —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Boribori!)} 09:57, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

You seemes to be a professional lier as you have been threatening by lying that you can block my IP, You have no authority to be issuing ultimatums. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.160.18.209 (talk) 10:22, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

IP blocked for 24 hours. As you've been advised, stay away from edit-warring, keep it civil (which you seem to be doing), use talk pages, etc. You're on 3RR at the moment on one article so be careful. It doesn't look as though this is going to go away easily, does it? Dougweller (talk) 10:50, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. By the way, you seem to be ticking the minor edit box which is only for things like spelling corrections, minor formatting, etc. Dougweller (talk) 10:55, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. You seemed emotionally linked with younus and foundation, let me tell you emotion are nothing on wikipedia what I have done is because it should be happened on wikipedia because it an encyclopedia not a place to advertise your organization.--Iamsaa (talk) 12:17, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

• Iamsaa, how can you justify that Omi is emotionally inclined towards, or linked to either the MFI (foundation - as by you) or Younus AlGohar. Just because she has been the main-editor of MFI and Younus AlGohar doesn't mean that she is linked to either of the mentioned. For example, if I said you were linked to Gohar Shahi, that would be ridiculous, I understand and respect that you are a constant editor of the article, but I wouldn't go as far as too accuse of being linked to the mentioned, thus, I advise that you too have mutual understanding between fellow-editors on Wikipedia. It's already a cruel world out there, and you could make a difference to everyone by being a better person, at least, online. Thanks a lot-- NY7 ☆ 22:42, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

• • Your tone is a prove of my point, you both are emotionally linked with Younas & MFI. Keep your advises for yourself, they will be very helpfull to you. Thanks--Iamsaa (talk) 06:16, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
    • Why you wana play Carousel with Wikipedia?--Falconkhe (talk) 06:39, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

May I burst your bubble? How can you accuse Omi of being emotionally linked with either AlGohar or the MFI. That's like saying that the 'Moon is made of cheese, and it is because it looks like it'. I suggest you keep a respectful tone with your fellow editors on Wikipedia, as Wikipedia is too a community. Both IDs (Iamsaa & Falconkhe including a dozen other IPs (?)) seem quite similar in their remarks and views, which do leave an impression that it's either one person using many IPs and IDs through a software.-- NY7 ☆ 19:39, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your sensible comment Nasiryounus. Falconkhe/Iamsaa/Random IP's, I hope we can look past all those edit wars and make some headway on the articles- keeping in mind, of course, to at least try not to pass accusatory comments about other people on Wikipedia.

You Need to Read wikipedia

• MFI and Younus Harami (bastard) dont belong to gohar shahi. We have already warned and tell what we want but it seems that you have no respect for our demands. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.71.8.21 (talk) 08:43, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
  • And here we go again, with the ridiculous comments from randoms IPs. As if the world was actually lacking such fools.-- NY7 ☆ 09:28, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

I know. I just find it useless to reply back to these types of comments...its too tiresome. Omirocksthisworld(☺) 10:33, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi Omi, we don't normally block all IPs from editing a talkpage, but considering the recent vandalism here I think we should make an exception. So would you like me to semi protect this page so that IP editors and brand new accounts can't edit it? ϢereSpielChequers 11:03, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Hey WereSpielChequers, that would be greatly appreciated...thanks! :) Omirocksthisworld(☺) 11:25, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

OK I've put a three month protection on. ϢereSpielChequers 13:41, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! :) Omirocksthisworld(☺) 23:19, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

No problem. If you get more problems and need it extended after it lapses, or you have problems on other pages, have read of Wikipedia:Protection policy or Wikipedia:Rough guide to semi-protection and file a request at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. ϢereSpielChequers 23:39, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Okay will do! Omirocksthisworld(☺) 00:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your message but I am busy nowadays and not able to spend time on WP.--Falconkhe (talk) 10:20, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

• So, Falconkhe, how is that that you're so busy you cannot invest enough time to build a better relationship with a fellow editor, but you have enough time to go around editing discussions pages, people's comments, making unnecessary redirects and nonconstructive fiddles. Funny, isn't it?-- NY7 ☆ 18:51, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your message, its not necessary that whatever, you think is correct and according to Policies of WP. So, don't revert my edits.--Falconkhe (talk) 09:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

• Oh yes, you're right. But I don't think that's a bit hard to understand, in fact it's common sense, and you've still not answered my question.-- NY7 ☆ 04:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

What about your POV behaviour and linkage with younus, I am not accussing but I am sure you both (You & Other ID) have personal link with Younus and MFI, that's you are promoting them.--Falconkhe (talk) 07:54, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback - Nick Thorne

Hello, Omirocksthisworld. You have new messages at Nick Thorne's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

RFC: Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi and associated pages

Hi, regarding the long-running content disputes over articles and pages relating to Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi, I have opened an WP:RFC. Please see: Talk:Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi#RFC: Long-running content disputes. Thanks, Esowteric+Talk 11:56, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

• There is a no dispute whether Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi actually died, disappeared, or went into "occultation". We believe that he went into Occultation on 25th November 2001. The only organization HE founded was Anjuman Serfroshan-e-Islam and not MFI. Younus has nothing to do with Gohar Shahi, younus is using the name and pictures of Gohar Shahi for his ill-deeds. Through,RAGS International, The Representative of Gohar Shahi & Messiah Foundation International, Younus AlGohar, younus and his companion are using Wikipedia for self promotion of his self-made teachings. So, my point of view is that Younus should stopped on this stage, he shouldn't allow to use wikipedia for his ill-deeds.--Falconkhe (talk) 12:39, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. I've replied on the talk page of the article. Omirocksthisworld(Drop a line) 01:23, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Younus AlGohar. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. — Scientizzle 19:50, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi

I have left comments as requested.--Your Message (talk) 11:37, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Omirocksthisworld. Thank you.--Your Message (talk) 12:33, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Omirocksthisworld(Drop a line) 12:45, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Omi'. Good to hear from you. Hopefully the guy will have got the message after another five sock/meatpuppets have been indefinitely blocked. He now has his very own category: Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Iamsaa. So much for being a "seeker after Truth", eh? Esowteric+Talk 20:13, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Award: thank you!

Many thanks for the barnstar and for your own efforts! Also noted that we may have fresh WP:MEAT the day after the block at RAGS. Esowteric+Talk 10:05, 12 March 2010 (UTC) Thanks:)..does this mean the a new investigation will have to be opened? It looks like a meatpuppet/sockpuppet to me too.--Omirocksthisworld(Drop a line) 10:25, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Many thanks to you as well

I appreciate the recognition, but I also wanted to compliment you on your persistance and patience. Nuujinn (talk) 00:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks :)! Omirocksthisworld(Drop a line) 21:23, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Hi Omi', just to let you know that your name has been mentioned at an AN/I report. You can find it here about Newatwp.

Personally, I find you open to discussion and easy to work with.

Thanks, eric. Esowteric+Talk 14:01, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. I understand, and I think its the right thing to do- I'm going to have to "clear my name" so to speak with this guy if I ever want to fix this. Thanks for your help with all of this. Omirocksthisworld(Drop a line) 20:17, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppet case: cleared and closed

Resolved

Hi, just to let you know that at Sockpuppet investigations they found no sign of sockpuppeting by you, Nasiryounus or RayStar77. You can find the archived case here. Regards, Esowteric+Talk 09:43, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Esow' :). Omirocksthisworld(Drop a line) 09:59, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

a warm welcome

nice to see new editors join our project, please message me if you need anything.

Here to help articles tagged for rescue! Articles tagged for deletion and rescue Category Articles tagged for deletion and rescue not found Hi, Omirocksthisworld, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles that have been tagged for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, which can be fixed and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated! Some points that may be helpful: Our main aim is to help improve articles, so if someone seeks help, please try to assist if you are able. Likewise feel free to ask for help, advice and clarification. Many times we are asked to help rescue articles by people new to our notability and sourcing policies. If the article is not fixable we can help explain why and offer alternatives. Many of these editors are also new to Wikipedia so may see deleting "their" article as "bitey". Encourage civility and maybe even {{welcome}} them if they have only been templated with deletion messages. The Articles for deletion (AfD) discussion is where the concerns regarding each article are brought up and addressed. To be an effective member of the project you need to know how AfD works as well as how to improve articles. Introduction to deletion process gives a good overview and some good advice for newcomers to deletion. Our primary work is improving articles tagged for rescue. On this template you can see a drop-down list of current articles tagged. You can install it on your own page by putting {{ARS/Tagged}}. A more dynamic list with article links and description is on our current articles page. It is highly recommended you watchlist it. If you have another language besides English, please consider adding yourself to the list of translators available. Articles and sources that use non-English languages often need translation for those of us who cannot translate for ourselves. Many important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is recommended that you watchlist it. If you have any questions, feel free to post a question on the talk page. And once again — Welcome! Okip 04:02, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi

A spot check on the page looks like it is identical to the Spanish page. Perhaps someone has beaten me to the chase. Can you point out specific sections? Kiteinthewind ^{Leave a message!} 05:20, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

No such thing as being a bother (well, there is, but you are far from there :D)! Anytime! Kiteinthewind ^{Leave a message!} 05:38, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

I got your request to update the Norwegian version, but there are some odd discrepancies, such as whether he is alive or dead. If you don't mind, I'd like to see how the English version unfolds before I start doing work on the Norwegian one. This is a topic I know nothing about, and I don't think I have time to do the research needed to get familiar about. Fascinating biography, though. Leifern (talk) 06:10, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

A Request for Help (Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi)

I can't find an article on Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi on the Dutch Wikipedia, and in your request you actually linked to the German ("Deutsch") Wikipedia. Although I know some German too, I think you'd better contact someone from the German translation list. – gpvos (talk) 08:34, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

How can my knowledge of Polish be helpful to you? This article has no Polish version yet, although I may fix that and stub it soon. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 20:26, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello. Regarding your request to update the German version with content from the recently revamped English Wiki article, I'll have to tell you that this is not as easy as translating stuff from German to English. Due to copyright policies of the German Wiki, the entire article history of an English article will first have to be imported to the German wiki, which can take a while depending on admin speed. Other than that I have still another translation project to do over here, so I'll have to decline your request. I'm sure though that there are other translators around who'd like to help you with the German version. De728631 (talk) 16:51, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi at Wikiquote

Thanks for your help with the cross-wiki content dispute at q:Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi. ~ Ningauble (talk) 17:29, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

No problem- the IP sock of User: Iamsaa has been adding that article for a source on every WikiProject since being banned from this one. Omirocksthisworld(Drop a line) 23:24, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for being late .I have just updated the info regards to Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi's disappearance in Vietnamese Wikipedia.--AM ^(talk) 18:12, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:BurningPassports.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:BurningPassports.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:08, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:BurningPassports.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:BurningPassports.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:43, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Rescue

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 13:50, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Seasonal Greeting

--Nuujinn (talk) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec10/Balloon}} to your friends' talk pages.

Christmas Card

File:Wikisanta-no motto.png

Merry Christmas At this festive time, I would like to say a very special thank you to my fellow editors, and take the time to wish you and your loved ones a very Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year. And, in case you can't wait until the big day, I've left you each three special presents, click to unwrap :) Acather96 (talk) 10:10, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Green and Yellow Present.gif

File:Yellow and Red present.gif

File:Blue and Red Present.gif

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MFIProtesters.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MFIProtesters.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:45, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of The Representative of Gohar Shahi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Representative of Gohar Shahi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Representative of Gohar Shahi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Scientizzle 23:07, 18 October 2011 (UTC)