Nikizai

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vitaliy Khutoryanskiy (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by The Most Comfortable Chair were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vitaliy Khutoryanskiy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— The Most Comfortable Chair 03:11, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Nikizai! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — The Most Comfortable Chair 03:11, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Vitaliy Khutoryanskiy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vitaliy Khutoryanskiy. Thanks! — The Most Comfortable Chair 03:23, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks very much for your feedback. I have revised the article and replaced many references with independent ones. I believe that Prof Khutoryanskiy fully meets criterion 1 due to high citations of his publications. I am thinking of moving the citation information to the beginning of the article to make this point clearer. Additionally several of his papers are Highly Cited according to Web of Knowledge classification. Furthermore, criterion 1 is met because of his service on editorial boards of several journals (which I now included in a separate section of the article). Additionally he has some publications in especially prestigious and selective academic journals. I also believe that he meets criterion 2 because of his prestigious awards such as 2012 McBain medal and 2022 Innovative Science Lecture Award (both from notable academic societies - Royal Society of Chemistry and Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences. These are more prestigious than FRSC award). Nikizai (talk) 15:11, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences (APS) (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences (APS) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:36, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Vitaliy Khutoryanskiy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Vitaliy Khutoryanskiy. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 11:21, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Penetration enhancers has been accepted

Penetration enhancers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:43, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Penetration enhancers

On 25 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Penetration enhancers, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that penetration enhancers can open tight junctions to allow entry of drugs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Penetration enhancers. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Penetration enhancers), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vitaliy Khutoryanskiy (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pichemist were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vitaliy Khutoryanskiy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 16:29, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vitaliy Khutoryanskiy has been accepted

Vitaliy Khutoryanskiy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 17:20, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences (APS) (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheChunky were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences (APS) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 19:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by InterstellarGamer12321 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 18:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mucus-penetrating particles

Hello, Nikizai. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mucus-penetrating particles, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences (May 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RPSkokie were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 11:35, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Hello, Nikizai. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Academy of Pharmaceutical Sciences".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:16, 28 November 2023 (UTC)