AfC notification: Draft:Mukul Kumar has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mukul Kumar. Thanks! Hitro talk 09:50, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mukul Kumar (April 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 09:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Nehakushwaha.jp! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mukul Kumar (May 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Gusfriend (talk) 09:50, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Mukul Kumar has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mukul Kumar. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:59, 3 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mukul Kumar (August 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 17:51, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mukul Kumar has been accepted

edit
 
Mukul Kumar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

bonadea contributions talk 08:43, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Nehakushwaha.jp. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 13:06, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

November 2022

edit
 

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Mukul Kumar, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Nehakushwaha.jp, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Nehakushwaha.jp|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 20:26, 14 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi Team,
Greetings from Neha!
I would like to inform you that this is not the paid collaboration.
Thank you. 103.95.83.207 (talk) 09:20, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi Team,
Greetings from Neha!
I would like to inform you that this is not the paid collaboration. He is doing a great job for society to educating them and making them more efficient so one can focused in their career.
Waiting for your positive reply asap.
Thanks. Nehakushwaha.jp (talk) 09:09, 4 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Servpriy Tyagi

edit

  Hello, Nehakushwaha.jp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Servpriy Tyagi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Servpriy Tyagi

edit
 

Hello, Nehakushwaha.jp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Servpriy Tyagi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:46, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply